Civil Rights, white, black or purple are worth NOTHING, BECAUSE of the "exclusionary rule." The DEAL with the devils in the Black Robed Royalist Guild of JUDGES. At the inception of the "exclusionary rule" it was decided by CORRUPT JUDICIAL fiat that Civil Rights would only be worth something to GUILTY felons who had had their rights deprived.
The Exclusionary rule gives guilty criminals a pass, but it does nothing for the innocent person whose rights are deprived. The innocent person's rights can be deprived by the police, the prosecutor or the malicious and corrupt judge and their is no REMEDY!!!!
To hear the supreme court sophistry tell us, via their unrestricted absolutely immune power, We the People, all evidence to the contrary, traded the "King can do no WRONG" for the of the ABSOLUTELY IMMUNE actions of the "malicious or corrupt" judges (Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)), the "malicious or dishonest" prosecutor (Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976)), the "knowingly false testimony by police officers" (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)), corrupt, malicious, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid actions of federal, state, local, and regional legislators (Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997) Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367, 372, 372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138) and the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid actions of "all persons (spouses) -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process" (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)) acting under color of law to render ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of INALIENABLE RIGHTS under color of law.
We need a constitutional amendment to END the judicial sanction of Malice, corruption, dishonesty, sincere ignorance, conscientious stupidity and Incompetence
Article III Judicial Power is defined and limited by an act of "We the People's" Government, Congress/President. It does not require a CONSTITUTIONAL amendment. All it takes is an act of congress. It is time that "We the People" assert our control of the Supreme Court: "with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make" (Article III, Section. 2, § 2)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!