Ginsburg, Kagan, Sotomayor, and Breyer PWC 14-10088, USAP8 15-1 057, David Gerard Jeep, Petitioner v. United States

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan,

SoniaSotomayor, and Stephen Breyer

Supreme Court of the United States

Washington, DC 20543-0001

Re: PWC 14-10088, USAP8 15-1 057, David Gerard Jeep, Petitioner v. United States

Dear Justices,

Tolerance of IGNORANCE has never been my strong suit.  I realize that you are corrupted by your years of service in the interest of the judicial-black-robed-royalist-oligarchy.  Your Clerk’s Office has thus pushed the above referenced petition off this year’s 2014 October to June docket and into the trash dump of the opening October 2015 dismissive court order.

What is a mere 3 months?[1]  This has been an 11+ year struggle for me.  I spent 411 days in jail[2] and have been homeless for the last 7+ years in my struggle for a justice remedy in the “Jane Crow” era. 

Now I have had unequivocal PROOF of the judicial officers unconstitutional deprivation of “due process” constitutional rights actions taken in a "clear absence of all jurisdiction," Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, 80 U. S. 351. Pp. 435 U. S. 355-357” (Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 356 (1978)).  I have now presented this unequivocal and uncontested EVIDENCE to the District, Circuit and Supreme Court SIX TIMES with docketed and denied Petitions for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-5193, 13-7030, 14-5551 and 14-10088

The instigating judicial action was taken in a complete absence of the Common Law, Constitutional Law and Statute Law jurisdiction.  Jurisdiction requires probable cause with Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Personal Jurisdiction and Geographic Jurisdiction.

Now your ongoing CRIMINAL “sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity”[3] has thwarted the 7^th Amendment and criminal law remedy of the invasion/deprivation, "it is a general and indisputable rule that where there is a legal right, there is also a legal remedy by suit or action at law whenever that right is invaded" /deprived (Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 163 (1803)).

If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

“Time is of the essence”

David G. Jeep

cc:  My Blog - Monday, June 08, 2015, 4:23:19 PM

---

[1]  $14,807,000.00

[2] Federal Courts declined to prosecute No. #4:09-cr-00659-CDP

[3] “Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity” Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., Ch. 4 : Love in action, Sct. 3