 |
Chief Justice John G. Roberts
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543-0001
|
Congressman Wm. Lacy Clay
111 S. 10th Street, Suite 24.344
St. Louis, MO 63102-1125
|
Senator Claire McCaskill
5850 Delmar Blvd.,
Ste. A
St. Louis, MO
63112-2346
|
Senator Roy Blunt
7700 Bonhomme, #315
Clayton, MO
63105-0032
|
The CELEBRATION of Sincere
Ignorance and Conscientious Stupidity
Dear People,
Do not insult OUR collective intelligence by saying that the Supreme Court is anything more than a political branch that has the power of a life-tenured oligarchy. The Rule of Law was a victim of the Southern Victory in the Civil War.
I
realize you are all corrupted and thus are no longer capable of seeing the “Sincere Ignorance and Conscientious
Stupidity.” In spite
of that “We the People” need to RE-ESTABLISH justice either with you, over you
or around you.
If
the MASS incarceration of America does not show it, the Supreme Court’s corrupt
stare decisis is irrefutable. Justice
requires fairness. Justice is no
longer available to “We the People” because of the unrestrained self-serving assertion
of “absolute immunity” for "the deprivation of any rights, privileges,
or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America." I restate the “sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity” as a question for the
RECORD:
“In all-fairness, how can "rights, privileges, or immunities
secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America” AND “absolute immunity” for "the deprivation
of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws
of the United States of America” BOTH BE CONSTITUTIONAL?
Martin Luther King, Jr. knew when he said… "Nothing in the world is
more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity."”
Do we need a constitutional amendment to END
the blind judicial sanction of malice, corruption, dishonesty, sincere
ignorance, conscientious stupidity and Incompetence? Try and keep kidding yourselves that the
current Mass Incarceration trends that America is experiencing and the rest of
the world is not, is the result of the criminal laws that both America and the
rest of the world have in common. The
rest of the world has left America in the Ayn
Rand cultural dust of the wild-wild-west. They have matured and America has not. They still have a justice system and Americas
justice system was the victim of the Southern victory in our so called Civil
War. [1]
I
HAVE SAID BEFORE AND I WILL KEEP SAYING IT UNTIL YOU HEAR ME!!!!![2] There is no effective check on the ruling
oligarchy of the Supreme Court.
Judges,[3]
Prosecutors,[4] Police[5]
and All Persons[6] have
“absolute immunity” for "the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or
immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America."
Malicious or corrupt OR INCOMPETENT judges[7]
turn a blind eye to “malicious or
dishonest”[8]
persecutions via prosecutors[9]
withholding of “evidence favorable to
an accused”[10]
with “knowingly false testimony by police
officers,”[11] IT HAPPENS EVER SINGLE DAY IN AMERICA!!!!
THINK!!!!!!!!!!! PLEASE!!!!!! THINK!!!!!!!!!
If there is anything further I can do for you
in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
“Time is of the
essence”
David G. Jeep
cc: My Blog - Monday, June 15, 2015, 3:59:13 PM
[3] “This immunity applies even when the judge is accused
of acting maliciously and corruptly, and it "is not for the protection
or benefit of a malicious or corrupt judge, but for the benefit of the public,
whose interest it is that the judges should be at liberty to exercise their
functions with independence and without fear of consequences."” Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 554 (1967)
[4] “To be sure, this immunity does leave the genuinely
wronged defendant without civil redress against a prosecutor whose malicious
or dishonest action deprives him of liberty. But the alternative of
qualifying a prosecutor's immunity would disserve the broader public interest.
It would prevent the vigorous and fearless performance of the prosecutor's duty
that is essential to the proper functioning (Page 424 U. S. 428) of the
criminal justice system.”Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976)
[5] There is, of course, the possibility that, despite the truthfinding
safeguards of the judicial process, some defendants might indeed be unjustly
convicted on the basis of knowingly false testimony by police officers. (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)
[6] “In short, the common law provided absolute immunity
from subsequent damages liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise
-- who were integral parts of the judicial process.” Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 335 (1983)
[8] Ibid., Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976)
[9] Ibid., Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976)
[10] The Bill of Rights does not require “’difficult problems of proof,’ and
we must adhere to a “stringent standard of fault,” lest municipal liability
under §1983 collapse into respondeat superior.12 Bryan County, 520 U. S., at
406, 410; see Canton, 489 U. S., at 391–392.”(CONNICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ET
AL. v. THOMPSON)
Any
violation of rights secures for the INDIVIDUAL person “where a specific duty is
assigned by law, and individual
rights depend upon the performance of that duty, it seems equally clear
that the individual who considers himself injured has a right to resort to the
laws of his country for a remedy” (Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 167 (1803))
and "it is a general and indisputable rule that where there is a legal
right, there is also a legal remedy by suit or action at law whenever that
right is invaded." (Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 164 (1803))
[11] Ibid., Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)
No comments:
Post a Comment