Judicial authority has been CHECKED by the
JURY since Magna Carta (1215).
Lawfully Judicial authority has been CHECKED by the JURY since
Magna Carta section 39 (1215). In the United
States Article III Constitutional Judicial authority has always been constrained
by the Jury requirements of Article III Section 2.3 and the VII Amendment.
Our forefathers saw this potential. The Star Chamber (c. 1641) and the "Bloody
Assizes" (1685) WERE REAL in their memory! During the process for the Bill of Rights"
Elbridge
Thomas Gerry, one of the founding Fathers asked, without Due Process of Law
how do "We the People" avoid mob rule or "a tribunal without juries, which will be a Star-Chamber
as to Civil cases"[1]
?
If judges were INFALLIBLE, what was/is the need for a jury? Judges unchecked had been proven FLAWED prior
to 1215 the Magna Carta and the FLAW of Judges acting alone has ALWAYS been incorporated
into the “check and balances” of the Constitution for the United States, Article
III Section 2.3 and the VII Amendment.
I have no problem with John Marshal's assertion of " judicial
review " in Marbury v. Madison (1803).
Judges have every right to “free speech” but to bind their free speech opinions
they need to bring along a “JURY” in each case.
The assertion of "checks and balances" was and is essential
with OUR constitutional democratic government.
A jury is and has ALWAYS been CONSTITUTIONALLY ESSENTIAL to any
and EVERY Article III decision, Article III Section 2.3 and the VII Amendment.
Judicial authority has been CHECKED by a JURY requirement since
Magna Carta (1215).
Judicial infallibility was and is NULLIFIED with the trial by
jury requirement. If judges could be relied
upon what is the need of a jury? Trial by
jury became an explicit right in one of the most influential clauses of Magna Carta
(1215) Article 39 (and as codified in the Constitution for the United States Article
III Section 2.3 and the VII Amendment). The
FALLIBILITY of Judges has been an ESTABLISHED acknowledge rule of law since the
Magna Carta at least 1215.
[1] Elbridge
Thomas Gerry's, was one of three men who attended the Constitutional Convention
in 1787 but refused to sign the United States Constitution because it did not then
include a Bill of Rights. i.e., specifically
the 7th Amendment. This is as quoted in Origins
of the Bill of Rights, By Leonard W. Levy, page 228. (Elbridge
Thomas Gerry is also the namesake for Gerrymandering)
No comments:
Post a Comment