USPS 70221670000115162328, Delivered, PO Box 02/22/2023 7:17am WASHINGTON DC 20543.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543-0001
Re: DGJeep[1] v. United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856) FOLLOW UP
Dear People,
I am sane. I realize that may seem a strange assertion, but when you have repeatedly been dealing with clearly insane people, it is REQUIRED. I have TWO psychological examines in the bag, to prove it. Both at your expense and insistence.[2] Please remember you held me in jail for 411 days without a bond, trial, or conviction. My case for my sanity has not changed, psychiatrist[3] listen to and analyze based on reason not prior irrational precedent.
The Article III judges that assert "absolute immunity from subsequent damages liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"[4] are CLEARLY the crazy ones. How can anyone reasonably expect their constitutional civil rights to be protected while "absolute immunity from subsequent damages liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"[5] exists for the deprivation of said constitutional rights?
Just so you know I am keeping records. I sent you a certified letter with a $300 postal money order, which you received on "11:47 am on August 2, 2022." You returned the letter and the postal money order to me via First Class US mail. I sent you another certified letter with another $300 postal money order, which you received on "11:31 am on November 29, 2022.[6]" I have heard NOTHING since.
Now I hold out hope that you are actually considering it. Although I feel it more likely that you are ignoring your "due process" constitutional responsibility as you and others have done in the past e.g., Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856), Ableman v. Booth, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 506 (1859), Blyew v. United States, 80 U.S. 581 (1871), United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876), Chesapeake, O. & S. R. Co. v. Wells, 1887, p. 5, Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905), Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 559 (1967), Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983). Penn v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003), Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011), and last but certainly not THE LAST - Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 597 U.S. ___ (2022).
I mean recently you use your non de minimis zealous-religious (i.e., non-scientific) opinion to create a person with rights that has NO VIABILITY to eat, breath, think, move on its own. You could as easily make a zealous-religious case to say god made cancer and for ANYONE to remove their cancer violates my religion. There was a time when surgery was considered illegal and sacrilegious. We grew out of it. We the People had grown out of zealous-religious abortion fear too, until you created judge-made-law with a false assertion of "judicial absolute immunity" attached.
Now your six-person majority on the Supreme Court of the United States was clearly created by Mitch McConnell's unprecedented 2016 senate corruption and the corruption of the Trumpian/Russian fraud of the 2016 United States presidential election. For We the People to even consider the Supreme Court as viable begs all common sense.
But the corrupted precedent of judicial absolute immunity's judge-made-law motivated all the 2016 corruption. Before we can even think about the 2016 elections and senate corruption, we need to first overcome the naïve political operative's belief in judge-made-law. Judge-made-law is a Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803) fiction. John Marshall the first and longest serving Chief Justice, the author of Marbury v Madison, aspired to it, but never had the hubris to act upon. Marshall's successor, the second longest serving Chief Justice, Roger Brooke Taney certainly had no lack of hubris in his use of Judge-made-law.
The Founders were very much aware of the historically corrupt power of a judiciary e.g., THE[1] Star Chamber 1641[7] and the Bloody Assizes 1685.
Over the last TWENTY years I have made EIGHT petitions through the Article III courts i.e., district, circuit and supreme, Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856.
I have the court transcripts, the court records, and the documentation that PROVES your corruption in defense of the open uncontested fraud of the beat cops, family commissioner, state court judges, my ex-spouse and YOURSELVES. You explain your corruption with the self-serving assertion of an unconstitutional NEED FOR personal absolute immunity.
Theoretically, I have no issue with beat-cops, judges or even a spouse's potential need for a justifiable ex-parte order of protection.
I do have is an ISSUE with, the corruption of a beat cop who is either completely incompetent of police procedure or one who lies for a conviction and / or a judge who issues an order without ANY probable cause and / or a spouse who uses a clearly fraudulent ex-parte order of protection to get the upper hand in a custody / divorce dispute and / or a Supreme Court that wants to assert "absolute immunity from subsequent damages liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"[8] exists for the deprivation of constitutional civil rights.
You SOMEHOW assert you have immunity from the very document you have SWORN to "defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." I doubt the founders ever thought that a new "Star Chamber" could arise over their clearly unequivocal constitutional limitation of a trial by jury i.e., Article III, Section 2.3, the V, VI, VII and ultimately the XIV Amendments.
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts."
― Winston S. Churchill
If there is anything further, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
David G. Jeep
cc: Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice, Sandra Day O'Connor (Retired), Associate Justice , Anthony M. Kennedy, (Retired) Associate Justice , David H. Souter (Retired), Associate Justice, Stephen G. Breyer, (Retired), Associate Justice, Lisa Nesbit c/o Scott S. Harris Supreme Court Clerk, Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski and Willie Geist - Morning Joe - MSNBC Network, Attorney General Merrick Garland, DOJ Civil Rights Division
www.DGJeep.com, file
[1] It should be noted that my middle class family roots had the Jeep name centuries in advance of the Willys Motor Co creation of their General Purpose (GP) for the U.S. Army. My paternal grandfather was born 21 NOV 1888 • my father fought in WWII and drove / rode a GP.
[2] Charges are Dismissed without Prejudice for failure to comply with the Speedy Trial Act (Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP).
[3] One of the psychiatrist mentioned how they thought my assertion of "Jane Crow" discrimination for a man in divorce was at least SANE, if not a worthy cause.
[4] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983)
[5] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983)
[6] If there are any questions, see my blog @ www.dgjeep.com)
[7] Abolition of the Star Chamber July 5, 1641:
_"An act for the regulating of the privy council, and for taking away the court commonly called the star-chamber.
"WHEREAS by the great charter many times confirmed in parliament, it is enacted, That no freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or disseised of his freehold or liberties, or free customs, or be outlawed or exiled or otherwise destroyed, and that the King will not pass upon him, or condemn him; but by lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land…"
[8] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983)
Thanks in advance...
"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')
David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)
www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com
Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message
David G. Jeep
1531 Pine St Apt #403
St. Louis, MO 63103-2547
No comments:
Post a Comment