Wednesday, December 11, 2024

little guy Trump


Thursday, December 5, 2024

 

Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.[1]

Supreme Court of the United States

One First Street N.E.

Washington, DC 20543-0001

 

Re:     I am the little guy Trump has always said he was or wanted to be seen as!

22 CFR § 93.2 - Notice of suit, any and all assertions of enduring non-exigent immunity are an abdication and / or a dereliction of due process of law under Article III – as it relates to any person, a former president[2] or DGJeep[3] v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)[4]

 

Dear People,

 

This is going to be a short and REAL simple Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States, so the proverbial "four-year-old"[5] can understand it.

If you can believe Donald J. Trump's schtick[6]?  Trump has been falsely and maliciously persecuted his whole life by the "deep state,"[7] "fake news,"[8] and "identity"[9] persecution in support of "sacred cow" minorities."[10]?  I do not believe it, but he wants you to believe it.  He wants to be the victim.  He wants to be symbolically attacked so he can get more sympathetic free press calling himself out as the victim of the "deep state.' "fake news" and "identity"[11] persecution in support of "sacred cow" minorities."[12] 

Trump does not want to fix any of those issue, he merely wants to exploit them for his personal benefit.

I want to remind you!!!  Trump is a convicted and diagnosed chronic degenerate, fraud, and liar... a 7-time bankrupt… a want-a-be Banana Republic Dictator… Carnival barker.  He could not lead a complex organization out of a proverbial wet-paper-bag[13]

Trump has always had expensive white-shoe[14] absolutely-immune law firms to purport his fraud and it all looks above board and legal.  And in a world of "deep state" absolutely-immune "judge made law"[15] he has and will continue to get away with it.

If you believe Trump is a victim?  I am the little guy VICTIM of the "deep state.' "fake news" and "identity"[16] persecution in support of "sacred cow" minorities"[17] on steroids… Trump has always wanted to be!  Trump ought to be seeking me out and defending me to confirm and fix his campaign assertions of the "deep state," "fake news" and "identity"[18] persecution in support of "sacred cow" minorities."

You can believe me when I say I have been unconstitutionally persecuted for 20+ years by the absolutely-immune "deep state," the less than engaged "fake news" and the Democrat's assertion of identity "sacred cow" minorities.[19]  I have PROOF!

I was held in jail for 411 days.[20]  My constitutional rights, my black socks, my home, my son, my everything were ALL unconstitutionally taken by the "deep state," "fake news," and an assertion of "Jane Crow" "sacred cow" minorities. [21] I have been fighting the system, pacifically for over 2o years.  I have been impoverished.   I have PROOF! 

Of course, I have never had access to expensive white-shoe absolutely-immune law firms for my VII Amendment rights or the protection of federal law 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights.

The "deep state.' "fake news" and assertion of identity "sacred cow" minorities[22] have always thwarted me.

Trump's assertion of persecution,[23] if you can believe his brother, his niece, and the New York Times[24] has always been a fraud.  Trump has never been successful at anything other than FRAUD and losing the money his father had criminally acquired and given him. 

Trump has never been affected by what he calls the "deep state," "fake news," and assertion of "sacred cow" minorities[25].  It is all PROJECTION[26] for his self-aggrandizement.  His current absolutely-immune supporters in the justice system and on the Supreme Court have delayed his criminal "deep state" prosecution into a stupor.  Trump as the father of self-generated "fake news" has forever benefitted from the "fake news" he and David Pecker created prior to and in the 2016 presidential election.[27]  And when he asserts with a smirk that his sexual abuse victims are just crybabies, they are too many to ignore.

I should not need a lawyer; the deprivation of rights is sooooo "sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would have understood that what he is doing violates that right[28]".  But I spent several thousands of dollars on lawyers at the start, until I ran out of money, fighting the "deep state.' "fake news" and assertion of "sacred cow" minorities[29]

Now I am just an impoverished little-guy victim of the "deep (absolutely-immune) state" "fake (not sensational enough) news" and assertion of "sacred cow" minorities[30]

As regards my issue with the "deep state," yes Socrates (470 – 399 BC) said we ought to be led by "Philosopher Kings," Alexander Hamilton reiterated a need for learned men in the judiciary in Federalist Nos. 81-85 (October 1787 - May 1788), Chief Justice John Marshall (Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)) self-servingly alluded to judicial review by learned men in the courts. 

Though it should be noted that John Marshal humbly never used judicial review outside of an instant case.  Arguably the first time "Judicial Review" was used, was in Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), where its "judge made law" fomented the Civil War (1861–1865).

KNOW that in the 4,000 words of the Constitution for the United States there is no refence to being ruled by an unelected appointed for life oligarchy via "judge made law."  Take 40 minutes, maybe an hour and half (90 minutes).  Reread the Constitution for the United States.  Show me any reference to an absolutely-immune, appointed for life "judge made law."  "It is my belief that there are 'absolutes' in our Bill of Rights, and that they were put there (or not put there) on purpose by men who knew what words meant".  Any reference to an unelected, appointed for life oligarchy's "judge made law" is not there!

The Supreme Court of the United States's precedent[31] "currently wants us to believe, "We the People" sub silentio[32] traded the "King can do no WRONG" for the ABSOLUTELY-IMMUNE actions of the "malicious or corrupt" judges (1871),[33] the "malicious or dishonest" prosecutor (1976)[34], the "knowingly false testimony by police officers (1983)"[35], the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, "sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid"[36] actions of "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process (1983)"[37] and now Presidents for thier official acts[38]. 

For as in absolute governments the King is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other. But lest any ill use should afterwards arise, let the Crown at the conclusion of the ceremony be demolished, and scattered among the people whose right it is. [39]

I am acting pro se presenting this Petition for Certiorari[40] suing[41] YOU and yours in your official capacity as Supreme Court Justices of the United States.[42]  Now I fully recognize that for you to grant cert on this petition requires you to take on the liability the constitution alone assigns you in an instant case.  But as men of integrity and humility it should not be that far of a stretch for you to admit you were and ARE wrong. 

I know if I had done something clearly illegal you and yours would see to it that I was punished[43] for it, even if I had been mistaken. 

If there is anything further, please let me know.

"Time is of the essence"

Thank you in advance.

 

David G. Jeep

 

enclosure

          Damages Spreadsheet

                     escalating as of Thursday December 05, 2024 01:19:54.00 PM      

 

cc: Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice, Anthony M. Kennedy, (Retired) Associate Justice , David H. Souter (Retired), Associate Justice, Stephen G. Breyer, (Retired), Associate Justice, Lisa Nesbit c/o Scott S. Harris Supreme Court Clerk, Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski and Willie Geist - Morning Joe - MSNBC Network, Attorney General Merrick Garland, DOJ Civil Rights Division, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Dick Durbin, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee

      www.DGJeep.com, file



[1] via USPO Certified Mail 7022 1670 0001 1516 2427

[2] 23-939 Trump, Donald J. v. United States

[3] a.k.a., David Gerard Jeep.  It should be noted that my middle-class family had the Jeep name centuries in advance of the Willys Motor Co creation of their General Purpose (GP) vehicle for the U.S. Army.  The Jeep family has been traced back to the 1500's,  My paternal grandfather was born 21 NOV 1888 • my father fought in WWII and drove / rode a GP.  There was NO proverbial "Henry Jeep!!!!"

[4] My argument NOW includes 23-719 Trump v. Anderson!!!

[5] Joe Miller: "Now, explain it to me like I'm a four-year-old." Denzel Washington in "Philadelphia"

[6] Schtick – noun , Slang. - (especially in comic acting) a routine or piece of business inserted to gain a laugh or draw attention to oneself.

[7] Let's call the "deep state" absolutely-immune unconstitutional state actors.  Any judge, prosecutor, police man or "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process." (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U. S. 336)

[8] Let's call the "fake news" any free press that tends toward the sensational over the factual.  Trump has promoted sensational tidbits on himself and others for YEARS.

[9] The Left / Democrats can not help me because my issue is about "Jane Crow" Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America!  The Left / Democrats has their proverbial "sacred cows" that cannot be questioned or diminished.   Woman's rights being one of them.

[10] A case can be made that Harris / Walz and the Democrats in general lost the 2024 popular vote by promoting their "identity" politics i.e., sacred cow minorities (i.e., immigrants, minorities, LGBTQ, blacks, women (Jane Crow) etc.) over the general population.  Some of the long-time bastions of Democratic support (Hispanics and black-males) abandoned the Democratic Party in the 2024 election.

[11] The Left / Democrats can not help me because my issue is about "Jane Crow" Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America!  The Left / Democrats has their proverbial "sacred cows" that cannot be questioned or diminished.   Woman's rights being one of them.

[12] The 2024 popular votehe long-time bastions of Democratic support (Hispanics and black-males) abandoned the Democratic Party in the 2024 election.

[13] As Micheal Bloomberg remarked, "How do you lose money running a casino?"

[14] White-shoe firm is a term used to describe prestigious professional services firms that have been traditionally associated with the upper-class elite.

[15] Article III gives the judiciary authority over an "instant case" exclusively, with the concurrence of a petit jury.  Judge may law was never even conceived of by Socrates, Alexandar Hamilton, or John Marshal.  We the People have been stuck in the mud of judge made law too many times, i.e., Dredd Scot, Blyew, Cruikshank, Plessy, Lochner, Stump, Mapp, Dobbs, etc.

[16] The Left / Democrats can not help me because my issue is about "Jane Crow" Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America!  The Left / Democrats has their proverbial "sacred cows" that cannot be questioned or diminished.   Woman's rights being one of them.

[17] A case can be made that Harris / Walz and the Democrats in general lost the 2024 popular vote by promoting their "identity" politics i.e., sacred cow minorities (i.e., immigrants, minorities, LGBTQ, blacks, women (Jane Crow) etc.) over the general population.  Some of the long-time bastions of Democratic support (Hispanics and black-males) abandoned the Democratic Party in the 2024 election.

[18] The Left / Democrats can not help me because my issue is about "Jane Crow" Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America!  The Left / Democrats has their proverbial "sacred cows" that cannot be questioned or diminished.   Woman's rights being one of them.

[19] With the 2024 popular vote the long-time bastions of Democratic support (Hispanics and black-males) abandoned the Democratic Party in the 2024 election because of an assertion of sacred cow minorities.

[20] The "fake news" never interviewed me they took what the absolutely-immune "deep state" actors fed them and published it in their story under MY NAME!!!  https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2011/08/st-louis-post-dispatch-arrest-march-12.html .... 

You can look at the letters I had written here….

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/search/label/Cookie%20Thorton

[21] With the 2024 popular vote the long-time bastions of Democratic support (Hispanics and black-males) abandoned the Democratic Party in the 2024 election because of an assertion of sacred cow minorities.

[22] With the 2024 popular vote the long-time bastions of Democratic support (Hispanics and black-males) abandoned the Democratic Party in the 2024 election because of an assertion of sacred cow minorities.

[24] "11 Takeaways From The Times's Investigation Into Trump's Wealth" NYTimes By Russ Buettner, Susanne Craig and David Barstow - Oct. 2, 2018

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-wealth-fred-trump.html

"Trump Engaged in Suspect Tax Schemes - as He Reaped Riches From His Father"  NYTimes By David Barstow, Susanne Craig and Russ Buettner - Oct. 2, 2018 

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-tax-schemes-fred-trump.html

[25] With the 2024 popular vote the long-time bastions of Democratic support (Hispanics and black-males) abandoned the Democratic Party in the 2024 election because of an assertion of sacred cow minorities.

[26] PROJECTION:

·       Trump's assertion of the "deep state"?  The Deep state allows anyone with money to avoid prosecution, just look at Trump's and Harvey Weinstein's sexual legacy.  But in office he is now protected by a sympathetic supreme court that has effectively allowed him absolute immunity, logistically, if not actually, he cannot be prosecuted.

·       Trump's assertion of "fake news" has to be considered with his self-serving abuse of Hillary Clinton with the National Enquirer as David Pecker testified.  He has been cooking up more self-serving "fake news" than being exploited by any.

·       In the "Jane Crow" era I have been victimized by the "sacred cow" Democratic issue of female abuse.  Where my ex-wife never even claimed abuse, but I got kicked out all the same.  Trump has ACTUALLY ABUSED many women and they are willing to testify to the abuse!  Trump is not a victim of "sacred cow" identity abuse, he is the abuser!

[27] "David Pecker, Ex-National Enquirer Publisher, Details How He Aided Trump"

Testifying for the prosecution, Mr. Pecker spoke about the mutually beneficial relationship between Donald J. Trump and the supermarket tabloid.  NYTimes By Matthew Haag - April 23, 2024

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/23/nyregion/david-pecker-trump-trial.html

[28] Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U. S. 635, 640 (1987), Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011)

[29] The 2024 popular votehe long-time bastions of Democratic support (Hispanics and black-males) abandoned the Democratic Party in the 2024 election.

[30] The 2024 popular votehe long-time bastions of Democratic support (Hispanics and black-males) abandoned the Democratic Party in the 2024 election.

[31] Sophistry(?) is a logical fallacy that involves the use of deceptive, superficial arguments.

[32] sub silentio is a Latin phrase that means "under silence" or "in silence". It's often used in legal contexts to describe something that's implied but not explicitly stated. For example, a court might overrule a case's holding sub silentio without explicitly stating that it's doing so.  Briscoe v. LaHue,  460 U. S. 362

[33] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)

[34] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976)

[35] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)

[36] "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." Martin Luther King, Jr.

[37] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)

[38] 23-939 Trump, Donald J. v. United States

[39] "Common Sense" is a 47-page pamphlet written by Thomas Paine in 1775–1776

[41] 22 CFR § 93.2 - Notice of suit

[42] BTW – Trump does not even know the country he is to be president of.  There is no president of America.  He cannot make America great again, when he is president of the United States.  The United States is only a small part of the America M.A.G.A.  wants to WALL-OFF themselves from.. 

As I am sure you know, the Constitution for the United States uses the name "United States" 52 times, to name itself.  Only twice does it include the merely descriptive prepositional phrase "of America." 

"We the People" are first and foremost United States citizens and only secondly and geographically Americans. 

Trump and others refuse our ACTUAL name because they do not want to UNITE… they want to divide us.

[43] To this day 20+ years later I still cannot legally get a driver's license to drive a car. 






--

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com  - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

 

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #512

St. Louis, MO 63103-2548

 

Friday, December 6, 2024

Biden’s PARDON for Hunter

Biden's PARDON for Hunter -- nothing Hunter Biden did would have EVEN been prosecuted for anyone other than a political opponent. Lying on a federal firearm application? Admitted and compensated for tax fraud?
---
The FACT that President Biden pardoned his son, for things his son never even would have been prosecuted for except that he was his father's son, is a GOOD THING for all fathers.
---
Trump has pardoned his accomplices and his vassals. For nothing other than debase, CORRUPTING reasons.
---




--

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com  - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

 

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #512

St. Louis, MO 63103-2548

 

Just remember you voted for and elected a CONVICTED, DIAGNOSED and PROVEN chronic DEGENERATE, FRAUD, LIAR seven-time bankrupt.



Trump's IRS investigated Comey and McCabe, found nothing.  Biden let Trump/GOP special counsels Hur and Durham investigate, they found nothing.  

Just remember you voted for and elected a CONVICTED, DIAGNOSED and PROVEN chronic DEGENERATE, FRAUD, LIAR seven-time bankrupt.   



--

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com  - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

 

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #512

St. Louis, MO 63103-2548

 

Monday, November 25, 2024

Be assured TRUMP will be his own undoing.

Be assured TRUMP will be his own undoing.  There are proven reasons why bitcoin (Ponzi scheme) , tariffs (tit for tat) and anti-immigration sentiment (isolationist) have FAILED in the past and will again!!!   

 

And so it begins…. Gaetz pulls out.  I mean all he did was pay off a few under age hookers for drug induced sex.

 

It is not like he had a civil judgement for $100 mill, for having raped someone in a changing room. 

 

Trump is a convicted and diagnosed chronic degenerate, fraud and liar.


--

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com  - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

 

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #512

St. Louis, MO 63103-2548

 

Friday, November 8, 2024

Trump is a CONVICTED and DIAGNOSED chronic DEGENERATE, FRAUD and LIAR.

Thursday, November 7, 2024

 

Trump is a CONVICTED and DIAGNOSED chronic 

DEGENERATE, FRAUD and LIAR... A 7 time Bankrupt...

I was looking at the DJT stock performance today (11/7/24):

Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. (DJT)

27.69, -8.26, (-22.97%), At close: 4:00 PM EST

26.50, -1.19, (-4.31%), After hours: 5:58 PM EST.

A little more than a week ago, before the election, it was trading at $51.50.  DJT, the stock, is of little consequence as to when it CRASHES.  It is going to CRASH, just like every other business trump has ever owned.  DJT the stock has no earnings as compared to its $100M of expenses.  And unfortunately for the Republicans and the country just like the second Trump administration. 

Trump is a CONVICTED and DIAGNOSED chronic DEGENERATE, FRAUD and LIAR-- Seven time bankrupt.  Trump got elected AGAIN in 2024 by flooding the market with degeneracy, fraud, and lies.  It has already been proven Trump got elected in 2016 with the use of the "fake news" he and David Pecker of the National Enquirer admittedly created.  Trump created fake news and then used the term falsely to describe his adversaries.  We have learned to call the psychological diagnosis for what it is chronic "Projection and Confession." . 

Trump has never run a successful profit generating business.  The REAL NEWS is Trump has been successful at one thing, losing the millions/billions his father left him.

There is NO disputing it!

Trump is a CONVICTED and DIAGNOSED chronic DEGENERATE, FRAUD and LIAR.  He cannot help himself.  HE will again CRASH and BURN.  To paraphrase as Micheal Bloomberg once remarked regarding trump, "How do you lose money with an exclusive casino concession within commuter train distance of a major population center?"  The unsophisticated American Indian tribes run several very profitable casinos in the middle of nowhere.  Trump could not manage a "cake walk" much less the largest democratic economic war power in the world.

Trump is a CONVICTED and DIAGNOSED chronic DEGENERATE, FRAUD and LIAR.  Trump has been impeached TWICE, and he is going to prove the old adage the "third time's a charm".  It is going to ring soooooo true. 

The difference this time is the GOP owns his ass!  He is NOT some "out of the blue" electoral college fluke.  THEY OWN HIM!!!  At each and every infraction, the sensible sane people will be saying " DEGENERATE, FRAUD and LIAR."  I doubt trump can keep the ship afloat for two years. 

The GOP is going to be begging the Democrats to help impeach him.  Trump is a CONVICTED and DIAGNOSED chronic DEGENERATE, FRAUD and LIAR. 

I am just hoping "We the People" learn from the TRUMP fiasco.  Make Civil RIGHTS of value AGAN!  Stop giving judges, prosecutors, police, rich people (trump, epstein and weinstein) and presidents ABSOLUTE immunity.  Start giving "We the People" our constitutional civil rights in the face of an incarceration rate 4 times that of the CIVILIZED world.  As the well-known writer of legal thrillers John Grisham; a former lawyer, recently remarked, "It is TOO easy to WRONGFULLY convict someone in the United States today, and TOO hard to exonerate them."

The FACTS of MY Case Are Without Question!  WWW.DGJeep.com 

Tooooooooooooo True.... https://www.youtube.com/shorts/mI1Tvecksns

 

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com - Dave@DGJeep.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

 

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #512

St. Louis, MO 63103-2548

 

Saturday, October 19, 2024

Missouri Vote NO on Missouri Amendment 7!!!!!

 

Humanity is not PERFECT and never will be.  Yes, democracy cannot be perfected by a voting system.   But there are better ways, a  mix of systems that would get us closer to perfection.  Open Ranked Choice Primaries with a customary “First to the Post” two candidate ballot to decide.

 

Why Democracy Is Mathematically hard/Impossible

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qf7ws2DF-zk

Sunday, September 29 2024, 9:47 PM.

 

In Missouri Vote NO on Missouri Amendment 7!!!!!


Missouri Amendment 7 on the November ballot

https://www.senate.mo.gov/24info/pdf-bill/tat/SJR78.pdf

 

Vote, vote. VOTE!!!! Vote, vote. VOTE!!!! Vote, vote. VOTE!!!! Vote, vote. VOTE!!!! Vote, vote. VOTE!!!!

Wednesday, October 16, 2024

“We the People” NEVER do anything sub silentio[1]


Download PDF as mailed 


Tuesday October 15, 2024  

 

Letter to The Editor

The New York Times

620 Eighth Avenue

New York, NY 10018


Re: “We the People” NEVER do anything sub silentio[1]

Dear Editor of The New York Times,

Those of you that were appalled by the presidential immunity in 23-939 Trump v. United States (07/01/2024); YOU ARE APPALLING LATE TO THE ISSUE!  

Judge made stare decisis law does not constitutionally exist!

The Supreme Court of the United States’s precedent[2] tells us, “We the People” sub silentio[3] traded the “King can do no WRONG” for the ABSOLUTELY IMMUNE actions of the “malicious or corrupt” judges (1871),[4] the “malicious or dishonest” prosecutor (1976)[5], the “knowingly false testimony by police officers (1983)"[6], the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, “sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid”[7] actions of “all persons (spouses) -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process (1983)”[8] and now the President’s for his official acts. 

You wonder why "We the People" incarcerates FOUR times as many citizens as any other developed nation TODAY?  Why “We the People" have had 100+ years of racial unrest?  Why "We the People" had the social unrest of the labor movement at the turn of the 20th century?  "We the People" have been subject to UNCONSTITUTIONAL Judge made stare decisis law.  The Rights of "We the People" are worth nothing and unenforceable in a United States court of law.  Now if you are Harvey Weinstein or Donald Trump and have millions to pay for legal defense, you can delay or avoid all league liability.

Judge made stare decisis law does not constitutionally exist![9]  The proverbial emperor has no clothes.

The Founding Fathers KNEW BETTER!  The Founding Fathers had recent historical experience of a corrupt and fallible judiciary with the “Abolition of the (namesake) Star Chamber 1641,”[10] the judges of the “Bloody Assizes” that in part fomented the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and just the run of the mill everyday judges as functionaries of the King..  Thomas Jefferson said “Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so. they have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privileges of their corps.[11]

Yes, Judicial independence was alluded to, though not textually, with an appointment for life in Article III of the Constitution for the United States. 

But, judicial review i.e., judge made stare decisis law was never ever-ever-even alluded to in the text of the Constitution for the United States.  Yes, Socrates via Plato's Republic in 375BC talked about "philosopher kings."   Judicial review was discussed by Alexander Hamilton (Federalist #78, 79 & 80) and self-servingly by the too much revered, long serving, early, Chief Justice John Marshal (Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)).[12]NONE of the matters!  

Judicial review, judge made stare decisis law, never made it into the 4,500 words of the Constitution for the United States and the Bill of Rights. 

The founding fathers did something better than the stare decisis of judicial review; they constitutionally established the historically tested[13] ”common law” of the trial by jury[14] for both criminal[15] and civil[16] disputes[17].  The founding father believed in the commonsense law they knew that evil could never take root, for “you can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.”  The possibility of a bad instant jury verdict is a lot easier to tolerate, if not fix, than a bad oligarchy making immutable “judge made stare decisis law.”

To think of the founding fathers even considering the possibility of an oligarchy of 6(?), 9(?), 10(?), 20(?) persons, appointed for life, making binding judge made stare decisis law, is totally repugnant to their memory.  Except of course for those that are so appallingly late to the issue.

Judge made stare decisis law does not constitutionally exist, and NEVER DID.

Yes, learned professional men, like Alexander Hamilton and John Marshall are / would be a benefit to the society at large, the sanitation department, the Article III Judiciary or an NFL referee.  But only humble “professional learned men” that know for a fact that they are fallible.  The constitution does not authorize an oligarchy of trash men, judges, prosecutors, policemen, presidents or NFL referees that cannot be criminally and civilly held for the deprivation of CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS by due process,[18] i.e., a jury.   

Yes there needs to be a Supreme Court to make an ultimate decision for AN instant case[19] - to possible hear an appeal from a potentially unjust jury trial.  But “We the People” do not need an oligarchy to make assembly-line judge made stare decisis law.  A rare Supreme Court decision in the extraordinary INSTANT CASE alone to enlighten “We the People” will be just enough.

A case can be made that, the much revered, John Marshall in 1803 lit the match for the Civil War some 60 year prior by positing judicial review as judge made stare decisis law.  The facts of Marbury v. Madison (1803) were mooted before the ruling and Judicial review was never used again until the Supreme Court lit the match for the Civil War with Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857) four years before the Civil War 1861

Judge made stare decisis law does not constitutionally exist!

That brings us to today’s prior judge made stare decisis law.  We have already lived through the racially discriminatory judge made stare decisis Jim Crow law of “Blyew,” “Cruikshank”…. and “Plessy.”  Judicial UNCONSTITUTIONAL controlling review AUTHORIZED racially motivated mass murder in 1871 with Blyew v. United States | 80 U.S. 581 (1871), racially motivated pogrom with Cruikshank[20] and 150+ years of racially motivated discrimination.  Not to mention the utter absurdity of the “liberty of contract” enshrined with Lochner.[21]

But before we get to the potential corruption of judge made stare decisis presidential absolute immunity for “official acts” law - for all you late comers to the appalling issue - we need to deal with the judge made stare decisis law of absolute immunity for the deprivation of rights[22] i.e., Bivens (1965),[23] Imbler (1976), Briscoe (1983) and others in our criminal system, that is handing out incarceration at a rate FOUR times that of the rest of the civilized world. 

Not to mention the “Jane Crow” discrimination in domestic relations law that has created a 7-fold increase in fatherless children in 40 years.[24]  Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States!  See the facts of my case, DGJeep v Supreme Court of the United States.[25]

Any and all asserted immunity from the constitution NOW or in the past is BY DEFINITION unconstitutional.  The Constitution is defined as the ultimate law that everyone has to adhere to, ESPECIALLY government actors i.e., Judges.

Judge made stare decisis law does not constitutionally exist.

“We the people” do not need a constitutional amendment to eliminate “judge made stare decisis law”.  “We the people” need to use the Constitution for the United States Article III, Section 2 “In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and undersuch Regulations as the Congress shall make” as the founders had intended.

If there is anything further, please let me know.


“Time is of the essence”

Thank you in advance.

 

 

David G. Jeep

 

cc: President Joe Biden

      Vice President Kamala Harris

      Lance Kunce

      Wesley Bell 

      United States Senator Elizabeth Warren

      United States Senator Eric Schmitt

      United States Senator Chuck Schumer

      www.DGJeep.com

      file



[1] sub silentio is a Latin phrase that means "under silence" or "in silence". It's often used in legal contexts to describe something that's implied but not explicitly stated. For example, a court might overrule a case's holding sub silentio without explicitly stating that it's doing so.  Briscoe v. LaHue,  460 U. S. 362

[2] Sophistry(?) is a logical fallacy that involves the use of deceptive, superficial arguments.

[3] sub silentio is a Latin phrase that means "under silence" or "in silence". It's often used in legal contexts to describe something that's implied but not explicitly stated. For example, a court might overrule a case's holding sub silentio without explicitly stating that it's doing so.  Briscoe v. LaHue,  460 U. S. 362

[4] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)

[5] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976)

[6] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)

[7] “Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.” Martin Luther King, Jr.

[8] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)

[9] It should be noted that the FIRST reference to “absolute immunity for judges” nearly a 100 after country’s inception was possibly the SECOND – third judge made stare decisis law that NEVER constitutionally existed, i.e., “absolute judicial immunity” with Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1871).  Bradley was a case that was emotionally though obscurely linked to the recent assassination President Abraham Lincoln.  AND thr claim was less than 12 months after President Grant signing The Enforcement Act[9] of 1871, also known as the Ku Klux Klan Act, that had made the deprivation of constitutional rights a crime.  “Because as was noted in 1871, Cong.Globe, 42d Cong., 1st Sess., 374. Mr. Rainey of South Carolina noted that "[T]he courts are in many instances under the control of those who are wholly inimical to the impartial administration of law and equity.”  Congressman Beatty of Ohio claimed that it was the duty of Congress to listen to the appeals of those who, “by reason of popular sentiment or secret organizations or prejudiced juries or bribed judges, [cannot] obtain the rights and privileges due an American citizen. . . ."  NOW codified as 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (also MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, dissenting. Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 559 (1967)

[10] “The Act for the Abolition of the Court of Star Chamber” [July 5, 1641. Statutes of the Realm, v. 110. 17 Car. I. cap. 10. See Hist. of Engl. ix. 404.]

[11] Thomas Jefferson to William Charles Jarvis, 28 September 1820

https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/03-16-02-0234

[12] The facts of Marbury v. Madison were mooted before the ruling and Judicial review was never used again until the Supreme Court lit the match for the Civil War with Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857).

[13] Magna Carta was issued in June 1215 and was the first document to put into writing the principle that the king and his government was not above the law. It sought to prevent the king from exploiting his power, and placed limits of royal authority by establishing law as a power in itself via trial by jury

[14]  You might have notices I do not say “due process of law.”  Due process of law includes a judge and jury.  And while the instant case and the courtroom threshold are also controlling.  A judge has absolutely no power without a jury verdict or a concession to a bench trial by all parties.

[15] Constitution for the United States Article III Section 2, “The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury”

[16] Constitution for the United States Amendment VII “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved”

[17] It should be noted that a judge has near absolute yet appealable authority over the evidence in the instant case and within the threshold of the courthouse.  But constitutionally any and all authority going forward outside the courthouse threshold and the instant case has to have the concurrence of a JURY.

[18] It should be noted that a judge has near absolute yet appealable authority over the evidence in the instant case and within the threshold of the courthouse.  But constitutionally any and all authority going forward outside the courthouse threshold and the instant case has to have the concurrence of a JURY.

[19] In legal terms, "instant case" is a descriptive term used to refer to a case, motion, order, or judgment that is currently being discussed or considered in court.

[20] United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)

[21] Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court holding that a New York State statute that prescribed maximum working hours for bakers violated the bakers' right to freedom of contract under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

[22] 18 U.S.C. § 241, 18 U.S.C. § 242, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Criminal and Civil protection of Civil Rights.

[23] Bivens created a cause of action for rights against six unknown FBI agents, but reaffirmed Judicial absolute immunity

[24]  “Jane Crow” discrimination is REAL.  In 1960 5% (one in twenty) children had no Father in the home.  In 2014 40% (eight in twenty) children have no father at home.  In my LIFETIME a 700% increase, that my Son and I HAD NO SAY IN. (The Fracking Boom, a Baby Boom, and the Retreat From Marriage" - Freakonomics – NPR - July 5, 2017, "Women just aren’t that into the ‘marriageable male’ anymore, economists say" Washington Post - By Danielle Paquette - May 16, 2017, “Male Earnings, Marriageable Men, and Nonmarital Fertility: Evidence from the Fracking Boom” Melissa S. Kearney & Riley Wilson - May 2017).

[25] DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)  

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html



https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html

 

 

Letter to The Editor

The New York Times

620 Eighth Avenue

New York, NY 10018

 

cc:

 

President Joe Biden

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20500

 

Vice President Kamala Harris

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20500

 

Lance Kunce

Lucas Kunce for Missouri

PO BOX 1240

Independence, MO 64051

 

Wesley Bell 

100 S. Central Ave 2nd Floor

Clayton, MO 63105

 

United States Senator Elizabeth Warren

309 Hart Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510

 

United States Senator Eric Schmitt

387 Russell Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510

 

United States Senator Chuck Schumer

322 Hart Senate Office Building

Washington, D.C. 20510

 

www.DGJeep.com

file

 

--

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

 

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #512

St. Louis, MO 63103-2548

  




 

www.DGJeep.com

 

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

 

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

 

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets