Friday, December 12, 2025

WTF is a “narco-terrorist”?

"Fake News Donny"

Trump, "the Deplorable"

 

 

Friday, December 12, 2025 - 7:16:44 AM

 

 

Pat, I am OK.  You are OK.

WTF is a "narco-terrorist"?

WTF is a "narco-terrorist"?

9/11 terrorist clandestinely came into our country and blew up buildings and killed people.  Narco terrorist do not threaten destruction.  Just because Trump puts something / someone on an ill-defined list of asserted terrorist; it does not make them evil.

I grew up affluent in the 1970s.  Alcohol, marijuana and cocaine were available.  I never got HOOKED!  I am not afraid that my son is going to get hooked.  A part from the over prescription of ADHD drugs (Methylphenidate (e.g., Ritalin, Concerta) and Amphetamine-based drugs (e.g., Adderall, Vyvanse, Dexedrine), I am not afraid my grandson will be addicted.  I drank a lot of beer, smoked a little weed and watched Harry J. Anslinger's "Reefer Madness" for fun!!!

 

Yes we had an opiate crisis in the last 10-20 years, aggravated by the NEW designer drug fentanyl.  But that was the result of illicit profiteering/marketing e.g., Purdue Pharma (OxyContin/Oxycodone) supply, naïve if not criminal over prescription by medical professionals before we even get to the users or the narco-importers.

 

I am not afraid of narco importers.  The United States is currently exporting our gangland violence that demanded the end to "prohibition" in 1933 to the third world.  Venezuela if anything ought to be demanding we STOP the demand for drugs as a solution to their domestic issues rather than Trump threatening their shores with aircraft carriers. 

 

We need to take a lesson from Portugal, legalize "drugs" deal with the health issues and instead of starting a trade war or a shooting drug war and sweeping the OUR domestic health issues under the rug!!!

 

 

"Fake News Donny"

 

Friday, December 12, 2025 - 7:16:44 AM

 

The Constitution for the United States - Article I, II, and  Schoolhouse Rock's[1] "I'm Just a Bill[2]" clearly define how to make law.  Show me where in the amended Constitution for the United States "judge-made-law" is called for or authorized[3]?

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view

The Issue with Trump, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html

American Exceptionalism – NOT SO MUCH

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html

A Balanced Budget for America

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html

BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president of...

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html

The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt "dark money" Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

The constitutional small "d" unrepresentative corrupt "dark money" Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

The Judicial sophistry of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law...  the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario. 

The Emperor Has No Clothes.

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html

DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

Friday, December 12, 2025 - 7:16:44 AM

"Fake News Donny"







--

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com  - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

 

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #512

St. Louis, MO 63103-2548

 
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Monday, December 8, 2025

Naïveté

"Fake News Donny"

Trump, "the Deplorable"

 

Sunday, December 7, 2025 - 9:03:59 PM

 

Pat, I am OK.  You are OK.

 

Your naïveté is showing

Senator Josh Hawley

381 Russell Senate Office Building

Washington, D.C. 20510

 

Senator Eric Schmitt

404 Russell Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510

 

Senator Tom Cotton

326 Russell Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510

 

Re:  Your naïveté is showing

 

Dear People,

 

"Drug Abuse" is, was and will always be a "personal responsibility issue."[1]

I saw Tom Cotton on "Meet the Press" 12/7/25.  Clearly Cotton was lying.  Show us the video with location and times stamp.  The TWO surviving shipwrecked speed boat victims exhibited no possibility to reengage hundreds, if not thousands of miles from shore without their motors floating on a partial portion of their boat, sans any motor.

RELEASE the VIDEOS with their times and locations. 

In fact the economics of shooting up a $5K motorboat with maybe $50K worth of wholesale drugs[2] with $200K guided laser missiles is just STUPID.  You could more effectively commission a Coast Guard Cutter[3], without additional expense to do the same thing with their M2 Browning .50 calibre machine guns or 25mm autocannons and their fast-attack inflatables. 

Any "War on Drugs" was, is and will always be a rhetorical assertion!

Drug abuse, in the modern world, will never be fixed or even really ever effected by a shooting war, or a trade war![4] 

"Drug Abuse" is, was and will always be a "personal responsibility issue."[5]

People will always use drugs e.g., alcohol, marijuana, opiates, etc., responsibly and some never can!  Killing others, extorting others will never relieve the personal responsibility failures of the addicted individual. 

Civilized society admitted this with the repeal of prohibition in 1933.  With the modern D.E.A. we have exported the Gangland violence that made prohibition unfeasible in our first world society to the third world.  We expect the "third world" struggling to feed itself, to fight a prohibition battle that we LOST with our well off "first world" society.

"Drug Abuse" is, was and will always be a "personal responsibility issue."

Trump does not want to fix the drug problem.  Trump wants to exploit your naïveté to assert an IMPOSSIBLE shooting war or trade war on "personal responsibility."  Trump wants a shooting war, to kill people and a trade war, to extort from people, TO ENHANCE HIS POWER!!! .

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/11/drug-abuse.html

If there is anything further, please let me know.

"Time is of the essence"

Thank you in advance.

 

David G. Jeep

 

cc: www.DGJeep.com

    file

 

"Fake News Donny"

 

 

 

Sunday, December 7, 2025 - 9:03:59 PM

 

The Constitution for the United States - Article I, II, and  Schoolhouse Rock's[1] "I'm Just a Bill[2]" clearly define how to make law.  Show me where in the amended Constitution for the United States "judge-made-law" is called for or authorized[3]?

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view

The Issue with Trump, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html

American Exceptionalism – NOT SO MUCH

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html

A Balanced Budget for America

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html

BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president of...

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html

The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt "dark money" Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

The constitutional small "d" unrepresentative corrupt "dark money" Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

The Judicial sophistry of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law...  the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario. 

The Emperor Has No Clothes.

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html

DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

Sunday, December 7, 2025 - 9:03:59 PM

 

"Fake News Donny"

 


[1] We would be wiser to take the proverbial bull by the horns like Portugal: stop chasing the impossible absolute prohibition, legalize it and TREAT the those that can not use "personal responsibility issue" effectively.

[2] The DRUGS were replaceable at wholesale price not at a street value that always exaggerates their value.

[3] Arguably the cost of the Coast Guard Cutter and the Aircraft Carrier's group are ongoing and are not at issue.  The only issue is the difference between the laser guided missile and the Cutter's autocannon and machine guns ammunition.

[4] China's Boxer Rebellion / Opium Wars were a different time and different place there is no comparison to the FRINGE use of drugs in today's educated, non-deplorable, society..

[5] We would be wiser to take the proverbial bull by the horns like Portugal: stop chasing the impossible absolute prohibition, legalize it and TREAT the those that can not use "personal responsibility issue" effectively.



--

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com  - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

 

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #512

St. Louis, MO 63103-2548

 
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, December 6, 2025

FLAW

   

Pat, I am OK.  You are OK.

 -

Randall - Bradely and Dates

The FLAW in American Justice

Monday, June 09, 2025, 3:19:41 PM

The Prosecution Rests, but I Can't

CONNICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ET AL. v. THOMPSON (3/29/11)

 

For the nearly 100 years that preceded Randall and Bradley (1776-1868) there was neither need nor questions regarding Judicial Immunity.  Then in the five years post-Civil War there were two cases.  Randall v. Brigham, 74 U. S. 536 (April 15, 1869)[1] in response to The Civil Rights Act of 1866 passed in to law April 9, 1866 and Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (April 8, 1872)[2] in response to Civil Rights Act of 1871 passed into law April 20, 1871.  


Both Randall and Bradley are contrived infighting issues, between lawyers and judges, they both concern issues regarding lawyers who’s names had been stricken from the bar by a Judge.  This in effect deprived the Lawyers of their profession.  The decisions in both Randall and Bradley are supposedly based on the common law Immunity derived from Lord Coke Floyd and Barker (1607).


Randall v. Brigham, Page 74 U. S. 536 (1868) was a judicial subterfuge to give the judiciary immunity from the recently enacted, over President Johnson’s Veto[3] expressed concerns about “assailing the independence of the judiciary” that would result from The Civil Rights Act of 1866[4] (any person under color of law who deprives someone of their rights) Likewise Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1871) was a subterfuge to give the judiciary ABSOLUTE immunity from the civil enacted by the Civil Rights Act of 1871.[5] 


There is no coincidence in the relative dates The Civil Rights Act of 1866 and Randall 1869, the Civil Rights Act of 1871 and Bradley 1871.  Judicial Immunity for civil rights enforcement went somehow unquestioned for nearly 100 years.  This hundred years it should be noted included the very worst of, post civil war, racial atrocities and civil rights abuses.  To think that somehow some one never thought to question a judge’s immunity from civil rights abuses seems almost nonsensical. 


That changed largely as the result of the America’s non-violent civil rights movement 1950-1980.  But even with the empowerment of African america’s cvil rights immunity for civil rights has become a burgeoning growth industry within Supreme Court Precedent.  In the recent past the Supreme Court  has awarded starting with Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 558 (1967) Judicial absolute immunity as regards Civil Rights, Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976) prosecutorial absolute immunity as regards Civil Rights, Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U. S. 365 (1978) as regards what can only be described despotic judicial absolute immunity as regards Civil Rights and finally Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 362 (1983) which states “The common law provided absolute immunity from subsequent damages liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process”  absolute immunity as regards Civil Rights for EVERYBODY integral parts of the judicial process. 

 

When the Law was at the discretion of the King, there was no immunity.  As justice systems advanced common law was created to take over where the King had no interest.  The King ceded absolute power starting with the Magna Carta in 1215 and continuing on to this day.  The common law was never written down in constitutional and or statute form as it is today.  The Law was at the discretion of the King or at the Discretion of the Common Law Judges interpretation of an unwritten law. 


The whole issue of Common Law versus Constitutional statute law revolves around immunity.  Constitutional Statute Law was created to remediate the inequities of the Common Law system.  The Common Law system left too much up to the discretion of the Common Law Judge, thus “We the People” on the case of the US of A decided to write “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

 


[1] RANDALL v. BRIGHAM is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 15, 1869. The case was argued before the court on April 6, 1869.   President john Veto Overridden by the House and became law on April 9, 1866 

[2] BRADLEY v. FISHER is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 8, 1872. The case was argued before the court on February 26, 1872. In a 6-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court.  Signed into law by President Ulysses S. Grant on April 20, 1871

[3] This provision of the bill seems to be unnecessary, as adequate judicial remedies could be adopted to secure the desired end without invading the immunities of legislators, always important to be preserved in the interest of public liberty; without assailing the independence of the judiciary, always essential to the preservation of individual rights; and without impairing the efficiency of ministerial officers, always necessary for the maintenance of public peace and order. The remedy proposed by this section seems to be in this respect not only anomalous, but unconstitutional; for the Constitution guarantees nothing with certainty if it does not insure to the several States the right of making and executing laws in regard to all matters arising within their jurisdiction, subject only to the restriction that in cases of conflict with the Constitution and constitutional laws of the United States the latter should be held to be the supreme law of the land.…

[4] Now codified into current statute law as TITLE 18 Criminal - PART I - CHAPTER 13 - CIVIL RIGHTS § 241 - § 249 President Andrew Johnson VETO Overridden by the House and became law on April 9, 1866 

[5] Now codified into current statute law as TITLE 42 Civil - CHAPTER 21 -CIVIL RIGHTS - SUBCHAPTER I - GENERALLY § 1981 - § 1985.   Signed into law by President Ulysses S. Grant on April 20, 1871


 

Sunday, June 8, 2025 - 8:36:51 AM

 

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html

American Exceptionalism – NOT SO MUCH

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html

A Balanced Budget for America

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html

BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president of...

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html

The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

Small "d" Un-Democratic “dark money” Senate

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

The Judicial sophistry of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law...  the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario. 

The Emperor Has No Clothes.

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html

DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

Sunday, June 8, 2025 - 8:36:51 AM


Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)