Thursday, December 5, 2024
Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.[1]
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543-0001
Re: I am the little guy Trump has always said he was or wanted to be seen as!
22 CFR § 93.2 - Notice of suit, any and all assertions of enduring non-exigent immunity are an abdication and / or a dereliction of due process of law under Article III – as it relates to any person, a former president[2] or DGJeep[3] v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)[4]
Dear People,
This is going to be a short and REAL simple Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States, so the proverbial "four-year-old"[5] can understand it.
If you can believe Donald J. Trump's schtick[6]? Trump has been falsely and maliciously persecuted his whole life by the "deep state,"[7] "fake news,"[8] and "identity"[9] persecution in support of "sacred cow" minorities."[10]? I do not believe it, but he wants you to believe it. He wants to be the victim. He wants to be symbolically attacked so he can get more sympathetic free press calling himself out as the victim of the "deep state.' "fake news" and "identity"[11] persecution in support of "sacred cow" minorities."[12]
Trump does not want to fix any of those issue, he merely wants to exploit them for his personal benefit.
I want to remind you!!! Trump is a convicted and diagnosed chronic degenerate, fraud, and liar... a 7-time bankrupt… a want-a-be Banana Republic Dictator… Carnival barker. He could not lead a complex organization out of a proverbial wet-paper-bag[13]!
Trump has always had expensive white-shoe[14] absolutely-immune law firms to purport his fraud and it all looks above board and legal. And in a world of "deep state" absolutely-immune "judge made law"[15] he has and will continue to get away with it.
If you believe Trump is a victim? I am the little guy VICTIM of the "deep state.' "fake news" and "identity"[16] persecution in support of "sacred cow" minorities"[17] on steroids… Trump has always wanted to be! Trump ought to be seeking me out and defending me to confirm and fix his campaign assertions of the "deep state," "fake news" and "identity"[18] persecution in support of "sacred cow" minorities."
You can believe me when I say I have been unconstitutionally persecuted for 20+ years by the absolutely-immune "deep state," the less than engaged "fake news" and the Democrat's assertion of identity "sacred cow" minorities.[19] I have PROOF!
I was held in jail for 411 days.[20] My constitutional rights, my black socks, my home, my son, my everything were ALL unconstitutionally taken by the "deep state," "fake news," and an assertion of "Jane Crow" "sacred cow" minorities. [21] I have been fighting the system, pacifically for over 2o years. I have been impoverished. I have PROOF!
Of course, I have never had access to expensive white-shoe absolutely-immune law firms for my VII Amendment rights or the protection of federal law 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights.
The "deep state.' "fake news" and assertion of identity "sacred cow" minorities[22] have always thwarted me.
Trump's assertion of persecution,[23] if you can believe his brother, his niece, and the New York Times[24] has always been a fraud. Trump has never been successful at anything other than FRAUD and losing the money his father had criminally acquired and given him.
Trump has never been affected by what he calls the "deep state," "fake news," and assertion of "sacred cow" minorities[25]. It is all PROJECTION[26] for his self-aggrandizement. His current absolutely-immune supporters in the justice system and on the Supreme Court have delayed his criminal "deep state" prosecution into a stupor. Trump as the father of self-generated "fake news" has forever benefitted from the "fake news" he and David Pecker created prior to and in the 2016 presidential election.[27] And when he asserts with a smirk that his sexual abuse victims are just crybabies, they are too many to ignore.
I should not need a lawyer; the deprivation of rights is sooooo "sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would have understood that what he is doing violates that right[28]". But I spent several thousands of dollars on lawyers at the start, until I ran out of money, fighting the "deep state.' "fake news" and assertion of "sacred cow" minorities[29].
Now I am just an impoverished little-guy victim of the "deep (absolutely-immune) state" "fake (not sensational enough) news" and assertion of "sacred cow" minorities[30].
As regards my issue with the "deep state," yes Socrates (470 – 399 BC) said we ought to be led by "Philosopher Kings," Alexander Hamilton reiterated a need for learned men in the judiciary in Federalist Nos. 81-85 (October 1787 - May 1788), Chief Justice John Marshall (Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)) self-servingly alluded to judicial review by learned men in the courts.
Though it should be noted that John Marshal humbly never used judicial review outside of an instant case. Arguably the first time "Judicial Review" was used, was in Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), where its "judge made law" fomented the Civil War (1861–1865).
KNOW that in the 4,000 words of the Constitution for the United States there is no refence to being ruled by an unelected appointed for life oligarchy via "judge made law." Take 40 minutes, maybe an hour and half (90 minutes). Reread the Constitution for the United States. Show me any reference to an absolutely-immune, appointed for life "judge made law." "It is my belief that there are 'absolutes' in our Bill of Rights, and that they were put there (or not put there) on purpose by men who knew what words meant". Any reference to an unelected, appointed for life oligarchy's "judge made law" is not there!
The Supreme Court of the United States's precedent[31] "currently wants us to believe, "We the People" sub silentio[32] traded the "King can do no WRONG" for the ABSOLUTELY-IMMUNE actions of the "malicious or corrupt" judges (1871),[33] the "malicious or dishonest" prosecutor (1976)[34], the "knowingly false testimony by police officers (1983)"[35], the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, "sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid"[36] actions of "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process (1983)"[37] and now Presidents for thier official acts[38].
For as in absolute governments the King is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other. But lest any ill use should afterwards arise, let the Crown at the conclusion of the ceremony be demolished, and scattered among the people whose right it is. [39]
I am acting pro se presenting this Petition for Certiorari[40] suing[41] YOU and yours in your official capacity as Supreme Court Justices of the United States.[42] Now I fully recognize that for you to grant cert on this petition requires you to take on the liability the constitution alone assigns you in an instant case. But as men of integrity and humility it should not be that far of a stretch for you to admit you were and ARE wrong.
I know if I had done something clearly illegal you and yours would see to it that I was punished[43] for it, even if I had been mistaken.
If there is anything further, please let me know.
"Time is of the essence"
Thank you in advance.
David G. Jeep
enclosure
Damages Spreadsheet
escalating as of Thursday December 05, 2024 01:19:54.00 PM
cc: Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice, Anthony M. Kennedy, (Retired) Associate Justice , David H. Souter (Retired), Associate Justice, Stephen G. Breyer, (Retired), Associate Justice, Lisa Nesbit c/o Scott S. Harris Supreme Court Clerk, Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski and Willie Geist - Morning Joe - MSNBC Network, Attorney General Merrick Garland, DOJ Civil Rights Division, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Dick Durbin, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee
www.DGJeep.com, file
[1] via USPO Certified Mail 7022 1670 0001 1516 2427
[2] 23-939 Trump, Donald J. v. United States
[3] a.k.a., David Gerard Jeep. It should be noted that my middle-class family had the Jeep name centuries in advance of the Willys Motor Co creation of their General Purpose (GP) vehicle for the U.S. Army. The Jeep family has been traced back to the 1500's, My paternal grandfather was born 21 NOV 1888 • my father fought in WWII and drove / rode a GP. There was NO proverbial "Henry Jeep!!!!"
[4] My argument NOW includes 23-719 Trump v. Anderson!!!
[5] Joe Miller: "Now, explain it to me like I'm a four-year-old." Denzel Washington in "Philadelphia"
[6] Schtick – noun , Slang. - (especially in comic acting) a routine or piece of business inserted to gain a laugh or draw attention to oneself.
[7] Let's call the "deep state" absolutely-immune unconstitutional state actors. Any judge, prosecutor, police man or "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process." (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U. S. 336)
[8] Let's call the "fake news" any free press that tends toward the sensational over the factual. Trump has promoted sensational tidbits on himself and others for YEARS.
[9] The Left / Democrats can not help me because my issue is about "Jane Crow" Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America! The Left / Democrats has their proverbial "sacred cows" that cannot be questioned or diminished. Woman's rights being one of them.
[10] A case can be made that Harris / Walz and the Democrats in general lost the 2024 popular vote by promoting their "identity" politics i.e., sacred cow minorities (i.e., immigrants, minorities, LGBTQ, blacks, women (Jane Crow) etc.) over the general population. Some of the long-time bastions of Democratic support (Hispanics and black-males) abandoned the Democratic Party in the 2024 election.
[11] The Left / Democrats can not help me because my issue is about "Jane Crow" Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America! The Left / Democrats has their proverbial "sacred cows" that cannot be questioned or diminished. Woman's rights being one of them.
[12] The 2024 popular votehe long-time bastions of Democratic support (Hispanics and black-males) abandoned the Democratic Party in the 2024 election.
[13] As Micheal Bloomberg remarked, "How do you lose money running a casino?"
[14] White-shoe firm is a term used to describe prestigious professional services firms that have been traditionally associated with the upper-class elite.
[15] Article III gives the judiciary authority over an "instant case" exclusively, with the concurrence of a petit jury. Judge may law was never even conceived of by Socrates, Alexandar Hamilton, or John Marshal. We the People have been stuck in the mud of judge made law too many times, i.e., Dredd Scot, Blyew, Cruikshank, Plessy, Lochner, Stump, Mapp, Dobbs, etc.
[16] The Left / Democrats can not help me because my issue is about "Jane Crow" Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America! The Left / Democrats has their proverbial "sacred cows" that cannot be questioned or diminished. Woman's rights being one of them.
[17] A case can be made that Harris / Walz and the Democrats in general lost the 2024 popular vote by promoting their "identity" politics i.e., sacred cow minorities (i.e., immigrants, minorities, LGBTQ, blacks, women (Jane Crow) etc.) over the general population. Some of the long-time bastions of Democratic support (Hispanics and black-males) abandoned the Democratic Party in the 2024 election.
[18] The Left / Democrats can not help me because my issue is about "Jane Crow" Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America! The Left / Democrats has their proverbial "sacred cows" that cannot be questioned or diminished. Woman's rights being one of them.
[19] With the 2024 popular vote the long-time bastions of Democratic support (Hispanics and black-males) abandoned the Democratic Party in the 2024 election because of an assertion of sacred cow minorities.
[21] With the 2024 popular vote the long-time bastions of Democratic support (Hispanics and black-males) abandoned the Democratic Party in the 2024 election because of an assertion of sacred cow minorities.
[22] With the 2024 popular vote the long-time bastions of Democratic support (Hispanics and black-males) abandoned the Democratic Party in the 2024 election because of an assertion of sacred cow minorities.
[25] With the 2024 popular vote the long-time bastions of Democratic support (Hispanics and black-males) abandoned the Democratic Party in the 2024 election because of an assertion of sacred cow minorities.
[26] PROJECTION:
· Trump's assertion of the "deep state"? The Deep state allows anyone with money to avoid prosecution, just look at Trump's and Harvey Weinstein's sexual legacy. But in office he is now protected by a sympathetic supreme court that has effectively allowed him absolute immunity, logistically, if not actually, he cannot be prosecuted.
· Trump's assertion of "fake news" has to be considered with his self-serving abuse of Hillary Clinton with the National Enquirer as David Pecker testified. He has been cooking up more self-serving "fake news" than being exploited by any.
· In the "Jane Crow" era I have been victimized by the "sacred cow" Democratic issue of female abuse. Where my ex-wife never even claimed abuse, but I got kicked out all the same. Trump has ACTUALLY ABUSED many women and they are willing to testify to the abuse! Trump is not a victim of "sacred cow" identity abuse, he is the abuser!
[28] Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U. S. 635, 640 (1987), Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011)
[29] The 2024 popular votehe long-time bastions of Democratic support (Hispanics and black-males) abandoned the Democratic Party in the 2024 election.
[30] The 2024 popular votehe long-time bastions of Democratic support (Hispanics and black-males) abandoned the Democratic Party in the 2024 election.
[31] Sophistry(?) is a logical fallacy that involves the use of deceptive, superficial arguments.
[32] sub silentio is a Latin phrase that means "under silence" or "in silence". It's often used in legal contexts to describe something that's implied but not explicitly stated. For example, a court might overrule a case's holding sub silentio without explicitly stating that it's doing so. Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U. S. 362
[33] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)
[34] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976)
[37] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)
[38] 23-939 Trump, Donald J. v. United States
[41] 22 CFR § 93.2 - Notice of suit
[42] BTW – Trump does not even know the country he is to be president of. There is no president of America. He cannot make America great again, when he is president of the United States. The United States is only a small part of the America M.A.G.A. wants to WALL-OFF themselves from..
As I am sure you know, the Constitution for the United States uses the name "United States" 52 times, to name itself. Only twice does it include the merely descriptive prepositional phrase "of America."
"We the People" are first and foremost United States citizens and only secondly and geographically Americans.
Trump and others refuse our ACTUAL name because they do not want to UNITE… they want to divide us.
[43] To this day 20+ years later I still cannot legally get a driver's license to drive a car.
