Constitutional Rights as regard Family Law. Mark Young, www.ExiledFathers.org

Mark Young, www.ExiledFathers.org

Mark Young, Arlington, VA

Phone (703)798-7598

E-mail: markyoung12@yahoo.com

I stumbled upon your petition "PETITION FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES"

I feel we are both after the same thing, the First and Fourteenth Amendments assurance of right to petition the government for a redress of grievances and EQUAL PROTECTION of the LAW, although we come to the issue from differing points of view. 

You reference only 42USC 1983 and 1985 where you should also be asking for protection of the criminal code  18USC241 and 242.  I quote from the FBI civil Rights Web Page:

Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law

This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.

This law further prohibits a person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation or custom to willfully subject or cause to be subjected any person to different punishments, pains, or penalties, than those prescribed for punishment of citizens on account of such person being an alien or by reason of his/her color or race.

Acts under "color of any law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under "color of any law," the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards, etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes ordinances, or customs.

Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one year, or both, and if bodily injury results or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire shall be fined or imprisoned up to ten years or both, and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

There are two critical misrepresentations to get its enforcement:

1.            We have to establish the Family Law is governed by the Constitution for the United States of America and not some rogue social engineering faction of our Courts.  It is absurd to even assert that “We the People” wold have thought to demand the protection of “any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws” [1] in every court action BUT when it concerned our life’s blood, our children, (custody agreements) and ALL our worldly possessions (property settlement). 
2.            We have to establish criminal and civil liability for "for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"[2] for "the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws.” [3]
         Not “"Absolute immunity… for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"[4] for "the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws." [5]  As is currently the Supreme Court’s interpretation.
         IMMUNITY is diametrically opposed to the Justice and Rule of Law.  The Immune person cannot be brought to heel by Justice or the Rule of Law by DEFINITION!!!!!!!!!!!!!   It is illogical insanity to assert anything but “IMMUNITY is diametrically opposed to the Justice and Rule of Law.”

We do not have any individually enforceable rights in this country, "Everybody, BUT the innocent victim, has "ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY"" for the deprivation of “any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America”[6] e.g., To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process, The Exclusionary Rule, Grounds for Impeachment, Jeep v Obama, Jeep v United States of America 10-1947, Jeep v Jones Wirt of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115

DGJeep"The Earth and everything that's in it" (http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/)

Thursday, April 21, 2011, 9:44:49 AM 2011 04-21-11 Mark Young, www-ExiledFathers-org.doc

Thanks in advance,

To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process

“Agere sequitur esse”
“Time is  of the essence"
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
E-mail is preferred Dave@DGJeep.com, DGJeep@DGJeep.com
(314) 514-5228

David G. Jeep
c/o The Bridge
1610 Olive Street,
Saint Louis, MO63103-2316

---

[1] Title Criminal 18, U.S.C, § 242, and Title Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983

[2] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) @ Page 460 U. S. 335

[3] Title Criminal 18, U.S.C, § 242, and Title Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983

[4] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) @ Page 460 U. S. 335

[5] Title Criminal 18, U.S.C, § 242, and Title Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983

[6] Title Criminal 18, U.S.C, § 242, and Title Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983