Thursday, April 21, 2011

Justice Requires Legal Liability Thursday, April 21, 2011, 4:27:42 PM The Prosecution Rests, but I Can’t


Justice Requires
Legal Liability
Thursday, April 21, 2011, 4:27:42 PM
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."[1]
Justice – The fair and proper administration of the laws.  Who is responsible for the fair and proper administration of the laws, without legal liability, NO ONE!  As long as "any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America"[2] are enforced randomly NO ONE can held responsible i.e., liable. 
"Justice is the end of government. It is the end of civil society. It ever has been and ever will be pursued until it be obtained."[3] 
Justice is how We the People expected to subdue the instinctual forces of nature, survival of the fittest.  To "establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility" We the People thought it prudent to inform all men upfront of the essence of the Union being proposed.  The essence of the Union was and is the individual's "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws"[4]We the People.  Within this union We the People take responsibility and LIABILITY for each other's "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America"[5] 
Who do I go to for my rights?  The guy that likes guns down the street?  The religious zealot wiling to die for a cause?
We the People take responsibility for EACH OTHER's rights.  With in the limits of this Union, expressed by "any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America,"[6] We the People are the keeper of "any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America."[7]  We the People by way of the very definition of a Union of democratic free persons take responsibility for the establishment, enforcement and confirmation of "any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America."[8]  We the People are only so free as the establishment, enforcement and confirmation of "any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America"[9] allow us to be.  If We the People are not protected by Due Process of Law, our enemies can attack with surprise while we are watching Monday night football and kidnap our children, throws us out of our homes and there is not a thing we can do to recover unless and until we find that like group of otherwise unrelated individuals that have in a timely and similar fashion been criminally accosted by the same Criminal Conspiracy against rights.  
If We the People do not assume the liability for the support the establishment, enforcement and confirmation of "any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America,"[10] We the People abdicate "any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America"[11] to nature's anarchy , survival of the fittest.
They have TAKEN EVERYTHING from me, what am I to do?  Take it on the chin for the greater glory of the CRIMINALS that randomly, corruptly, maliciously and incompetently conspire to deny "any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America?"[12]
John Thompson's rights were denied most recently by the Supreme Court FIVE[13] in the recent ruling Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571.  The Supreme Court FIVE[14] acknowledged the deprivation of Thompson's rights in the facts of the case.  My rights have been denied for 7 ½ years (Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115).  They took my son, my home, my father's good name, EVERYTHING I ever cared about!!!!!!!!!!!!  They did it ILLEGALLY and UNCONSTITUTIONALLY.  The facts of my case have never been disputed nor can they be.  The evidence is unimpeachable.
How do victims re-establish themselves after the criminal denial of a conspiracy against right without any legal liability for the same?  Do victims at least have the right to attack their criminal oppressors?
The Supreme Court FIVE[15] says that to peacefully recoup a loss victims have to from their criminally diminished position (for Mr. Thompson 14 years in a jail cell on death row, for me 7 ½ years of denial 3 ½ years of poverty and homelessness) find other victims that were in a timely and similar local criminal fashion been denied their rights also. 
The Supreme Court FIVE[16] says that the individual has no enforceable rights.  The "the right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of grievances," and the protection of the Civil (Title Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983) and Criminal (Title Criminal 18, U.S.C, § 242) statute only protects us when a group of people is denied their rights.  The Individual has no enforceable rights even though The First Amendment, Title Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title Criminal 18, U.S.C, § 242 are clearly worded to allow for the individual's redress of grievances. 
Clearly the Supreme Court FIVE's[17] requirement for Group Protection also creates a Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection violation.  The Victim sustains a loss for the protection of the law while the undamaged bystander is also protected and profited by the Government's learning experience but not damaged.  The difference between the damaged victim and undamaged bystander is UNEQUAL protection of the law.

We do not have any individually enforceable rights in this country, "Everybody, BUT the innocent victim, has "ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY"" for the deprivation of "any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America"[18] e.g., To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process, The Exclusionary Rule, Grounds for Impeachment, Jeep v Obama, Jeep v United States of America 10-1947, Jeep v Jones Wirt of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115

DGJeep"The Earth and everything that's in it" (http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/)
Thursday, April 21, 2011, 4:27:42 PM 2011 04-21-11 Justice Requires Legal Liability Thursday, April 21, 2011, 11-20-13 AM The Prosecution Rests, but I Can't REV 01.doc



[3] "The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments" The Federalist No. 51, Wednesday, February 6, 1788, by James Madison.



--
Thanks in advance


To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process

"Agere sequitur esse"
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
E-mail is preferred Dave@DGJeep.com, DGJeep@DGJeep.com
(314) 514-5228

David G. Jeep
c/o The Bridge
1610 Olive Street,
Saint Louis, MO 63103-2316