Saturday, April 30, 2011

“The Exclusionary Rule” Is a cover up Saturday, April 30, 2011, 10:28:50 AM The Prosecution Rests, but I Can't CONNICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ET AL. v. THOMPSON (3/29/11)

09-571 Connick v. Thompson (03/29/2011)
“The Exclusionary Rule”
Is a cover up
Saturday, April 30, 2011, 10:28:50 AM

The premise of The Exclusionary Rule is the assumption that the Judicial Process can do no wrong.  We the People pay the Police, the Prosecutors, the Judiciary, and the Justice Department to enforce “any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws[1] on our behalf.  
Yet they see themselves as criminally and civilly immune for the “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws” at our expense.  To make this COVER-UP more criminal if you will, they then let KNOWN criminals back on the street to COVER UP THE Justice Department’s CRIMINAL INCOMPETENCE, to wit: The Exclusionary Rule!!!!
The Supreme Court FIVE[2] in their ruling CONNICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ET AL. v. THOMPSON (3/29/11) excused the prosecutors attempted MURDER of Mr. Thompson without any criminal or civil repercussions.  The Supreme Court FIVE is, at present, getting away with it because of the self-serving Judge-made-law of immunity.  In CONNICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ET AL. v. THOMPSON (3/29/11) they do not call it immunity, they call it “difficult problems of proof”.  Both Connick and The Supreme Court FIVE admit to the evidence of the “deprivation of rights[3] in Connick v Thompson.  The difficult problems of proof” as The Supreme Court FIVE describe it is, Thompson should have proven that Connick not only denied Thompson’s rights but that Connick denied several other victims their rights in similar and timely fashion to the extent that Connick would have been forced to quite literally TRIP OVER the GLARING problem of the UN-enforcement of fair due process of law, to wit: the defense is entitled to evidence that would proves their innocents.  The judge-made-law standard in question Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83 (1963) had been openly on the books for 22 YEARS at the original conviction of Thompson in 1985!!!  Today it has been on the books for 48 years and still the Justice Department is NOT strictly liable for its common sense import, an accused is to be provided any evidence that would prove their innocence.
Not only does the Supreme Court FIVE refuse to limit their power per the “Constitution,[4] the Laws[5] of the United States, and Treaties[6] made” (Article III, Section 2 The Constitution for the United States of America (1788)), the Supreme Court FIVE refuses to enforce their own JUDGE-MADE-LAW 23-48 years after making it!!!!!!!!
Mr. Thompson, per the Supreme Court FIVE, from his jail cell on DEATH ROW, should have found other victims of Connick’s criminal conspiracy for the deprivation of rights[7] before Mr. Thompson tried to get a First Amendment un-abridge-able right to redress of grievance, either criminal or civil, from Connick.  That is, in immediate effect, allows any “one time” denial of rights ABSOLTE IMMUNITY from criminal and civil prosecution.  But even in Thompson’s case, where several violations were found, the “stringent standard of fault” and “difficult problems of proof[8] required by the Supreme Court FIVE’s Judge-made-law in Connick is not just stringent and difficult, they are IMPOSSIBLE to overcome!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It is INSANITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IMPEACH the Supreme Court FIVE!

The Right of Petition is the right to substantive justice between government and governed.  We do not have any individually enforceable rights in this country, "Everybody, BUT the innocent victim, has "ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY"" for the deprivation of “any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America[9] e.g., To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process, The Exclusionary Rule, Grounds for Impeachment, Jeep v Obama, Jeep v United States of America 10-1947, Jeep v Jones “The most humble petition for a Wirt of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115.”

DGJeep"The Earth and everything that's in it" (http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/)
Saturday, April 30, 2011, 10:28:50 AM 0000 Blank Issue Paper REV 00.doc



[4] First Amendment's declaration: "Congress shall make no law abridging the right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
[5] TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PART I—CRIMES, CHAPTER 13—CIVIL RIGHTS § 241. A Conspiracy against rights is a crime -- They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap (they aided and abetted in the kidnapping of my son), aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill (they aided and abetted in the attempted murder of Mr. Thompson), they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be
sentenced to death.
[6] The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights was adopted by the United Nations on 12/16/66, and signed by the United States on October 5, 1977 - PART II, Article 2, Section 3. Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes: (a) To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity;
(b) To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy; (c) To ensure that the competent authorities shall enforce such remedies when granted.
[7] TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PART I—CRIMES, CHAPTER 13—CIVIL RIGHTS § 241. A Conspiracy against rights is a crime -- They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap (they aided and abetted in the kidnapping of my son), aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill (they aided and abetted in the attempted murder of Mr. Thompson), they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be
sentenced to death.
[8] CONNICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ET AL. v. THOMPSON (3/29/11) Cite as: 563 U. S. ____ (2011) Page 18 of the opinion of the court.