Thursday, May 5, 2011

A LEGAL Precedent to abridge an un-abridge-able right? Thursday, May 05, 2011, 4:13:48 PM The Prosecution Rests, but I Can't CONNICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ET AL. v. THOMPSON (3/29/11)

-->
A LEGAL Precedent to abridge an
un-abridge-able right?
Monday, May 09, 2011, 1:14:32 PM

Our forefathers, for all the originalist thinkers in the group, in the Declaration of Independence knew what they wanted when they said:
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury
The Right to Petition, to our forefathers, meant more than the right to “repeated Petitions… answered only by repeated injury.”  Clearly our forefathers sought substantive justice between government and governed.  They had experienced, firsthand, the corruption, malice and incompetence of the Government of King George III’s “repeated injury.” 
Based on the failed result, with the Government of King George III, of our forefather’s attempts at justice with “repeated Petitions… answered only by repeated injury[1]” that resulted in the Revolutionary war, our forefathers thought it prudent to:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”[2]
Our forefathers sought to further define and establish Justice between the government and the people with the constitutionally assured First Amendment's lawfully un-abridge-able right:

“Congress shall make no law abridging the right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Yet in America Judicial Power has replaced the malice, corruption and incompetence of the King.  In America Judicial Power creates legal precedent.  Legal Precedent, Judge made law governs all?  NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Judicial Power was and is to be limited by the Constitution for the United States of America to wit:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby[3]
and
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made.[4]

This Constitution - the First Amendment secures us:

 “Congress shall make no law abridging the right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

The Laws - Statute law secures us:

TITLE 42--THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE CHAPTER 21--CIVIL RIGHTS SUBCHAPTER I—GENERALLY  Sec. 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress

and

TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PART I—CRIMES, CHAPTER 13—CIVIL RIGHTS § 241. A Conspiracy against rights -- If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same.

They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping (they stole everything and then kidnapped my son) or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill (they attempted to kill Mr. Thompson), they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

All Treaties made secures us:
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights[5]” as adopted by the United Nations[6] on 12/16/66, and signed by the United States on October 5, 1977 secures for third world countries and the United States of America:

PART II, Article 2, Section 3.
Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes:

(a)  To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity;

(b)  To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy;

(c)   To ensure that the competent authorities shall enforce such remedies when granted.

But our Judiciary ABRIDGES and openly deprives us of the protection of our “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws.[7]  "Everybody, BUT the innocent victim, has "ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY0"" for the deprivation of “any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America.”  Criminals go free if any of their rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws” are ABRIDGED,The Exclusionary Rule.”  Our Judges, our Prosecutors, our Police, point in fact “all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"[8] can criminally use the Color of Law to randomly, maliciously, corruptly or incompetently Steal, Kidnap, and Murder by depriving the innocent victim’s rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America.

And unless, the innocent victim while being impoverished, destitute, homeless and alone on the street or convicted in jail on death row, can prove that the criminals that stole from the innocent victim, the criminals that kidnapped[9] the innocent victim’s children, the criminals that attempted to MURDER[10] the innocent victim did the EXACT same thing to several other innocent victims in a timely and consistent pattern, the innocent victim has NO HOPE for substantive justice between the government and the people even if you repeatedly petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”  Judicial precedent deprives the victim of the right to substantive justice between the government and the people.[11]

There is binding LEGAL precedent out there that abridges the constitutionally and congressionally un-abridge-able Right of Petition’s as substantive justice between the government and the innocent victim?  This is OUR Judiciary at war with the constitution, at war with the common law, at war with the civilized world.  This is OUR Judiciary wagging a war of oppression against its own people.  And why?  Because, for self-serving reasons, the criminal conspiracy of black robed royalist in the JUDICIARY has simply said so?

Legal precedent that abridges a constitutionally and congressionally un-abridge-able right is repugnant to the Constitution, repugnant to common law and repugnant to the ends of Justice.[12]

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby[13]

for verifiable NOT “good Behaviour,[15]” denying the establishment of justice and abridging a Constitutionally secured and congressionally un-abridge-able right, with their deprivation of substantive justice between the government and the people, CONNICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ET AL. v. THOMPSON (3/29/11)!!!


The Right of Petition is the right to substantive justice between the government and the people.  We do not have any individually enforceable rights in this country, "Everybody, BUT the innocent victim, has "ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY"" for the deprivation of “any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America[16] e.g., To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process, The Exclusionary Rule, Grounds for Impeachment, Jeep v Obama, Jeep v United States of America 10-1947, Jeep v Jones “The most humble Petition for a Wirt of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115.”