Saturday, September 24, 2011

America actually believes it is EXCEPTIONAL but IT JUST AIN”T SO!!!!!


America Actually Believes It Is EXCEPTIONAL
but

IT JUST AIN"T SO!!!!!
"A country in which nobody is ever really responsible is
a country in which nobody is ever truly safe."[1]
Saturday, September 24, 2011, 5:22:41 PM
The Prosecution Rests, but I Can't[2]

Donald Trump is an IDIOT!!!  America was never as great as he claims.  The Americas were and are just lucky.  Thomas Paine "Common Sense" 1776 said it best :

"No country on the globe is so happily situated, so internally capable of raising a fleet as America. Tar, timber, iron, and cordage are her natural produce. We need go abroad for nothing."

But that was a 1776 fact. The 2017 fact is we have exploited our resources advantage and the world is nipping at our heels technologically. And facts are facts - "2 is not equal to 3, not even for large (patriotic) values of 2."[3].  

I realize this is going to sound UN-patriotic of me, if not down right UN-American, BUT, the truth has to be told.  America has for the better part of the last two centuries been acting as if we were anointed by God to lead the rest of the world to the promised land and to put it succinctly, IT JUST AIN"T SO!!!!! Again...

"2 is not equal to 3, not even for large (patriotic) values of 2."[3]


The roots of this misconception go back to "the Puritan John Winthrop's 1630 sermon "A Model of Christian Charity". Still aboard the ship Arbella, he had not even set foot a ground, Winthrop admonished the future Massachusetts Bay colonists that their new community would be a "city upon a hill", watched by the world. Winthrop's sermon gave rise to the widespread belief in American folklore that the United States of America is God's country because metaphorically it is a Shining City upon a Hill, an early example of American exceptionalism." Thomas Paine's Common Sense subsequently first popularized the belief that America was not just an extension of Europe but a new land, a country of nearly unlimited potential and opportunity that had outgrown the European model, King and country. And it was we had potential and opportunity but we have squander so much. We the People were then suckered in by the Monroe Doctrine and Manifest Destiny. How could We the People resist that? To let colonial America off the hook to some extent the French writer Alexis de Tocqueville first gave verbatim voice to "American exceptionalism" in his 1831 work, "Democracy in America." And both John Kennedy[4] and Ronald Reagan[5] like to refer to it, heck, it makes for good political copy, American exceptionalism, Shining City upon a Hill. But again I repeat:

"2 is not equal to 3, not even for large (patriotic) values of 2."[3]

And even though it is UN-American to even consider for an instant that We the People had NO RIGHT to expand and expand to our hearts content irregardless of our treaties with the Indians or the rights of Muslims or Southeast Asians. 

We the People were NOT anointed by God even though every politician from Monroe, to Lincoln, to Kennedy, and to Reagan loved to whip We the People up for their own POLITICAL benefit with the unfounded assertion… IT JUST AIN"T SO!!!!!

The United States of America, the North American Continent was never anointed by anyone or anything of GREAT GOD-LIKE POWER. The only thing North America had going for it at its discovery by the Europeans was that it had not as yet been populated and exploited by mankind to the degree that Europe had been populated and exploited. North America was literally and figuratively an untapped virginal gold mine. It had not been nor would it ever be anointed by GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!! We need to give ourselves a break and let ourselves off that proverbial hook. Not only because Our ECONOMIC clout is wearing thin but because it is the Right thing to do!!!!

Liberty is not granted or ordained by a god, nor is it secured by a constitution. Liberty is defined and limited by the proximity of the people. In a room, country or continent all by yourself you are at liberty. Put somebody else in the room, country or continent and you are no longer at liberty. Increase the population without constraint and liberty decreases with every increase in population, thus the proverbial tragedy of the commons. We need Government to keep the peace. And we will need more and more government as the population density increases. There is no magic libertarian paradise to be had. There are no special passes for Christians, Atheist, Whites, Blacks, Asians, Europeans, Americans, Democrats or Republicans.

We the People, in order to form a more perfect union, made an imperfect human attempt to improve government by establishing clearly defined rights with a Constitution for the United States of America. The Constitution for the United States of America was a humanly created document. It had its unavoidable inherent flaws e.g., its reference to African Americans as "three fifths of all other Persons." We the People were clearly not guided by some omniscient perfect being in writing and or establishing the Constitution for the United States of America. We the People made MISTAKES!!!!!!!!!!

What today passes for our exceptionalism is the result of We the People's almost inexorable economic success in exploiting the literally and figuratively untapped virginal gold mine under the proverbial "city upon a hill." It is not the City we built; it is and has always been the HILL. Our untapped resources are running out. Our ECONOMIC clout is wearing thin!!!!

We the People have been carrying around this burden of God's anointing for tooooooooo long. We need to, I say it again, let ourselves off the hook. We need to come to the VERY real realization that We the People of the United States of America are just like EVERYBODY else on the planet, we are fallible, and we are human!!!!!! 

We count our dead, we mourn our wounded from our SELF made whipped up wars in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iraq, BUT, as anointed by God American Exceptionals we IN-humanly never count the hundreds of thousands indigenous people dead of our supposed enemies the innocent bystanders to our travesty in the name of AMERICA EXCEPTIONALISM!!!! We are corrupted to the CORE!!!! And We the People can not even see it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The ultimate proof of this corruption, the ultimate example of our own human fallibility can be found TODAY in our creation of a new Royalist Nobility that is exalted on thrones in royalist robes. We have done this in spite of our revolutionary founders father's abhorrence for absolutism in religion, government or any union of men. They professed "that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness"[7] as the only ABSOLUTE!!! Liberty and equality by definition are abhorrent to the absolutism of American Exceptionalism. Equality has to, by the nature of its human application, allow for human variations, human differences. And Liberty by its intrinsic nature, its definition, opposes absolutism. No human living under the rule of absolutism of American Exceptionalism can ever be considered at liberty.

We the People with our Declaration of Independence (July 4, 1776), our Constitution for the United States of America (June 21, 1788), our Bill of Rights (December 15, 1791) and a Civil War confirming our Government of the people, by the people and people were intent upon finally putting aside all titles of nobility,[8] all men were pronounce equal[9] And We the People were purportedly against any grant of title of nobility i.e., the absolutism of American Exceptionalism. 

I would be willing to bet, a MILLION dollars if I had it. That every person in the United States of America believes… 

"It is a general and indisputable rule that where there is a legal right, there is also a legal remedy by suit or action at law whenever that right is invaded."[10]

But they would be WRONG, because our Supreme Court Article III posers pronounce themselves royal with the self-serving grant of Absolute immunity for the Black Robed Royalist Article III Judiciary posing/sitting on their thrones in our courtrooms. Absolute immunity as defined by the Supreme Court of the United States of America DENIES the Constitution for the United States as the Supreme Law as defined by itself and historical precedent the Magna Carta § 61 (1215),[11] 17th Century English Common Law - Floyd and Barker (1607), The Declaration of Independence (1776), the First Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America (1789),[12] 18th Century English Common Law as quoted in 19th Century Supreme Court precedent Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 163 (1803), Title Criminal 18, U.S.C, § 241 & 242 (1871), Title Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 & 1985 (1871) and treaties made, "The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights[13]" (as adopted by the United Nations[14] on 12/16/66, and signed by the United States on October 5, 1977). The Combined Supreme Court precedents defining their self empowering grant royalist absolute immunity:

"This immunity applies even when the judge is accused of acting maliciously and corruptly.[15]" "To be sure, this immunity does leave the genuinely wronged defendant without civil redress against a prosecutor whose malicious or dishonest action deprives him of liberty"[16]. "There is, of course, the possibility that, despite the truthfinding safeguards of the judicial process, some defendants might indeed be unjustly convicted on the basis of knowingly false testimony by police officers"[17]. Supreme Court precedent THUS provides for "absolute immunity… for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"[18] for the "deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws."[19]

The ministerial grant of "Absolute Immunity,"[20] by and for ministers, posing as the Article III Judiciary, is a massive, at the highest levels, ministerial, unconstitutional and "unlawful Conspiracy"[21] "before out of Court"[22] to obfuscate "false and malicious Persecutions."[23]

"Immunity is given to crime, and the records of the public tribunals are searched in vain for any evidence of effective redress." "The courts are in many instances under the control of those who are wholly inimical to the impartial administration of law and equity." I say it NOW, 2011!!! Justice William O. Douglas said it in 1961 and 1967. [24] Mr. Lowe of Kansas and Mr. Rainey of South Carolina respectively said it originally in 1871[25]


Impeach the Supreme Court FIVE[26]
for condoning the denial of a Constitutionally secured and congressionally un-abridge-able right to justice and
"fraud upon the court."

Impeach the Supreme Court FIVE for verifiable NOT "good Behaviour,[27]" denying the establishment of justice and abridging a Constitutionally secured and congressionally un-abridge-able right, with their deprivation of substantive 7th Amendment[28] justice between the government and the people, Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011 and "fraud upon the court" with Ashcroft v. al-Kidd No. 10–98  Decided May 31, 2011!!!

The Right of Petition is the right to substantive justice between the government and the people.  We do not have any individually enforceable rights in this country, "Everybody, BUT the innocent victim, has "ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY"" for the "deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America"[29] e.g., To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process, The Exclusionary Rule, Grounds for Impeachment, Jeep v Obama, Jeep v United States of America 10-1947, Jeep v Jones "The most humble Petition for a Wirt of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115."

DGJeep "The Earth and everything that's in it" (www.dgjeep.blogspot.com)
Saturday, September 24, 2011, 5:22:41 PM, 2011- 09-23-11 America actually believes it is EXCEPTIONAL REV 02.doc


[2] Op-Ed Contributor, The Prosecution Rests, but I Can't, By JOHN THOMPSON, Published: April 9, 2011 New York Times regarding Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011
[3] "Grabel's Law" not sure who, what or where Grabel's Law originated, all I know is I am using it as a reference here because it is all I have.
[4] In the twentieth century, the image was used a number of times in American politics. On 9 January 1961, President-Elect John F. Kennedy returned the phrase to prominence during an address delivered to the General Court of Massachusetts
[5] President Ronald Reagan used the image as well, in his 1984 acceptance of the Republican Party nomination and in his January 11, 1989, farewell speech to the nation
[6] Grabel's Law
[7] IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776. The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
[8] Article 1, Section 9, 7th paragraph  "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States," Article 1, Section 10, 1st paragraph "No State shall… grant any Title of Nobility"
[9] 14th Amendment §1. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
[10] Chief Justice John Marshal in Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 163 (1803) establishing Supreme Court precedent and quoting English common law per the Commentaries on the Laws of England, the 18th-century treatise on the common law of England by Sir William Blackstone (emphasis ADDED)
[11] The Magna Carta in 1215 (§ 61), the first modern attempt at limiting government, established the right of redress:
"If we, our chief justice (judges), our officials, or any of our servants offend in any respect against any man, or transgress any of the articles of the peace or of this security… they shall come to us - or in our absence from the kingdom to the chief justice - to declare it and claim immediate redress… by seizing our castles, lands, possessions, or anything else saving only our own person and those of the queen and our children, until they have secured such redress as they have determined upon."
[12] Amendment I, Congress shall make no law… abridging… the right of the people… to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
[13] "The Treaty "The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights" is presented for both its binding force as "Supreme Law of the Land", and also for its persuasive force in reason, to help understand the nature of our own Petition Clause, that it is a law of reason freely chosen by our founders: If we now choose it freely as a basis for the organization of free nations, why should we presume that it was less compelling when our Founding Fathers brought the Thirteen Colonies together under one Constitution?" 31 U. WEST L.A. L. REV. ( Summer 2000 ) JOHN E. WOLFGRAM
[14] "And if you think that is a national problem, consider that the United States is by far the World's greatest power; it is not accountable to its own people for its abuses of power, and that abuse of power flows freely into international circles. Given that reality, there is not a nation in the world that should not fear us in the same way that a reasonable person fears a child with a gun." 31 U. WEST L.A. L. REV. ( Summer 2000 ) JOHN E. WOLFGRAM
[15] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967)
[20] "absolute immunity… for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process" for the "deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws." Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) @ Page 460 U. S. 335
[21] Lord Coke Floyd and Barker (1607) "Judge or Justice of Peace: and the Law will not admit any proof against this vehement and violent presumption of Law, that a Justice sworn to do Justice will do injustice; but if he hath conspired before out of Court, this is extrajudicial; but due examination of Causes out of Court, and inquiring by Testimonies, Et similia, is not any Conspiracy, for this he ought to do; but subornation of Witnesses, and false and malicious Persecutions, out of Court, to such whom he knowes will be Indictors, to find any guilty, &c. amounts to an unlawful Conspiracy."
[25] Cong.Globe, 42d Cong., 1st Sess., 374 & 394
[27] Article III Section 1 the Constitution for the United States of America "The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour"
[28] Amendment VII In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.



--
Thanks in advance

To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process
"agere sequitor esse"

"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
E-mail is preferred Dave@DGJeep.com, DGJeep@DGJeep.com
(314) 514-5228

David G. Jeep
c/o The Bridge
1610 Olive Street,
Saint Louis, MO 63103-2316