"Those who can make you believe absurdities
can make you commit atrocities."
Voltaire
“A country in which nobody is ever really responsible is
Wednesday, October 19, 2011, 12:50:57 PM
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities," Voltaire. With that quote in mind I ask you to consider our Justice System. I cite the current ministerally[3] created Supreme Court Precedents for immunity that are and have been sustained by President Obama and past Presidents as executives in charge of the prosecution of crimes, i.e. George W. Bush and other’s knowingly false testimony:
"This immunity applies even when the judge is accused of acting maliciously and corruptly."[4] “To be sure, this immunity does leave the genuinely wronged defendant without civil redress against a prosecutor whose malicious or dishonest action deprives him of liberty."[5] “There is, of course, the possibility that, despite the truthfinding safeguards of the judicial process, some defendants might indeed be unjustly convicted on the basis of knowingly false testimony by police officers."[6]
ANY assertion of personal ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY, without proof of divinity, is a fraud, an absurdity and an atrocity, by any standard of Justice in a government of free and equal persons on THIS PLANET!!!!!
ANY assertion of governmental ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY, acknowledging un-avoidable human fallibility, is repugnant, an absurdity and an atrocity, to a government of the people, by the people and for the people on THIS PLANET!!!!!
The ministerial grant of “Absolute Immunity,”[7] by and for ministers, is a massive, at the highest levels, ministerial, unconstitutional and “unlawful Conspiracy”[8] “before out of Court”[9] to obfuscate “false and malicious Persecutions”[10] i.e., an absurdity and an atrocity.
“Immunity is given to crime, and the records of the public tribunals are searched in vain for any evidence of effective redress.” “The courts are in many instances under the control of those who are wholly inimical to the impartial administration of law and equity.” I say it NOW, 2011!!! Justice William O. Douglas said it in 1961 and 1967. [11] Mr. Lowe of Kansas and Mr. Rainey of South Carolina
Impeach the Supreme Court FIVE[13]
for condoning the denial of a Constitutionally secured and congressionally un-abridge-able right to justice and
"fraud upon the court."
Impeach the Supreme Court FIVE for verifiable NOT "good Behaviour,[14]" denying the establishment of justice and abridging a Constitutionally secured and congressionally un-abridge-able right, with their deprivation of substantive 7th Amendment[15] justice between the government and the people, Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011 and "fraud upon the court" with Ashcroft v. al-Kidd No. 10–98 Decided May 31, 2011!!!
The Right of Petition is the right to substantive justice between the government and the people. We do not have any individually enforceable rights in this country, "Everybody, BUT the innocent victim, has "ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY"" for the “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America”[16] e.g., To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process, The Exclusionary Rule, Grounds for Impeachment, Jeep v Obama, Jeep v United States of America 10-1947, Jeep v Jones “The most humble Petition for a Wirt of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115.”
DGJeep "The Earth and everything that's in it" (www.dgjeep.blogspot.com)
Wednesday, October 19, 2011, 12:50:57 PM, 2011 10-19-11 Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. Voltiare REV 00
[1] “And if you think that is a national problem, consider that the United States is by far the World's greatest power; it is not accountable to its own people for its abuses of power, and that abuse of power flows freely into international circles. Given that reality, there is not a nation in the world that should not fear us in the same way that a reasonable person fears a child (or a thief) with a gun.” 31 U. WEST L.A. L. REV. ( Summer 2000 ) JOHN E. WOLFGRAM Underlining and parenthetical text added for emphasis , i.e. George W. Bush and other’s knowingly false testimony
[2] “Damages” By Dahlia Lithwick Slate Posted Monday, Aug. 8, 2011, at 7:22 PM ET
[3] Ministerially created without constitutional or statute law support
[4] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967)
[7] “absolute immunity… for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process” for the “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws.” Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) @ Page 460 U. S. 335
[8] Lord Coke Floyd and Barker (1607) “Judge or Justice of Peace: and the Law will not admit any proof against this vehement and violent presumption of Law, that a Justice sworn to do Justice will do injustice; but if he hath conspired before out of Court, this is extrajudicial; but due examination of Causes out of Court, and inquiring by Testimonies, Et similia, is not any Conspiracy, for this he ought to do; but subornation of Witnesses, and false and malicious Persecutions, out of Court, to such whom he knowes will be Indictors, to find any guilty, &c. amounts to an unlawful Conspiracy.”
[11] Monroe v. Pape, 365 U. S. 167 (1961) and Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 559 (1967)
[12] Cong.Globe, 42d Cong., 1st Sess., 374 & 394
[13] Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, and Chief Justice John G. Roberts
[14] Article III Section 1 the Constitution for the United States of America
[15] Amendment VII In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States
No comments:
Post a Comment