Petition
for a Writ
of Certiorari 11-8211, Motion for a Rehearing,
Distributed
for Conference April
13, 2012
I sometimes feel like the
waif in “The Emperor’s New Cloths”
AM I THE ONLY ONE THAT CAN SEE
IT??
Thursday,
March 22, 2012, 3:15:40
PM
As the self-aggrandizing, malicious, corrupt
and incompetent Supreme Court assumes the center stage in the lives of EVERY
American, with their ever-over-reaching malicious, corrupt, incompetent
review of the “Affordable
Health Care for America Act” I am forced to laugh to keep from crying.
“We
the People” have NO RIGHTS in America! 99%
of us are naively pacified by the Supreme Court’s malicious, corrupt,
incompetent and self-serving assertion “that the
judges should be at liberty to exercise their functions with independence, and
without fear of consequences.”[2] “With
independence, and without
fear of consequences” in Supreme Court speak means without regard to
the “deprivation of any rights,
privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America
Rights, privileges, or immunities secured by
the Constitution and laws of the United States of America United States
of America JOB ! Justice without regard to the “deprivation
of any rights, privileges, or
immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America
As
any student of logic knows, as the Supreme Court is undeniably aware, that is begging the question (Latin petitio principii, "assuming the
initial point"), a type of logical fallacy in which a proposition is made
that uses its own premise as proof of the proposition. In other words, it is a
statement that refers to its own assertion to prove the assertion. We need judicial absolute immunity because the JUDICIARY self-servingly asserts it
needs to
exercise their functions with independence, and without fear of consequences”[7] i.e., without regard to the “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and
laws of the United States of
America
Specifically
in my case “The Evidence”[10] and “The Wrong,”[11] the CRIMINAL DENIAL of RIGHTS
and the basis of my injury, is undisputed and irrefutable in 8 years and FOUR 8th
Circuit Federal Court Appeals cases, 07-2614, 08-1823, 10-1947 and 11-2425 and
can be reviewed in detail there. I have
a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari 11-8211,
Motion for a Rehearing, Distributed for Conference April 13, 2012 that asks:
The REVISED QUESTION:
How can the Supreme Court,[12] “a delegated authority,”[13] acting under a constitutional commission award
themselves[14] and others “absolute
immunity”[15] from said constitutional commission to “do not only what
their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid”[16] i.e.,
the “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities
secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America,”[17] by DENYING the constitutional assurance of
governmental accountability with 1st and 7th Amendment Justice,
law and equity?[18]
DGJeep "The Earth and everything that's
in it" (www.dgjeep.blogspot.com)
Thursday,
March 22, 2012, 3:15:40 PM, 2012 03-22-12 “We the People” have NO RIGHTS in
America REV 02
[1] Mr. Thompson in
the New York Times in response to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Connick,
District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011
[2]
Scott
v. Stansfield, L.R. 3 Ex. 220, 223 (1868), quoted in Bradley v.
Fisher (1871), supra,
80 U. S. 349,
note, at 80 U. S. 350,
Pierson v. Ray,
386 U.S. 554 (1967)
[12] “The Judges,
both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good
Behaviour.” The Constitution for the United States of America
[13] Alexander
Hamilton, The Federalist Papers No. 78, “The Judiciary Department” - Wednesday,
May 28, 17 88
[14] There are TWO
constitutional prohibitions for the grant of Nobility to wit, “Absolute
Immunity,” Article 1, Section 9, 7th paragraph "No Title
of Nobility shall be granted by the United States" and Article 1, Section 10, 1st paragraph "No State
shall… grant any Title of Nobility."
[15] “absolute immunity
from subsequent damages liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise
-- who were integral parts of the judicial process.” Briscoe
v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) @ Page
460 U. S. 335
[16] Alexander
Hamilton, The Federalist Papers No. 78, “The Judiciary Department” - Wednesday,
May 28, 17 88
[18] Justice without
regard to equity impoverishes the victim at the expense of the evil they have
suffered. I have been forced into
poverty, homelessness for FOUR YEARS!
The 1st Amendment secures the constitutional right to a
lawfully un-abridge-able justifiable redress of grievance from the government:
“Congress shall make no law abridging the right of the people to petition the
Government for a redress of grievances.” The 7th
Amendment secures the right to settle all suits: “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed
twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved,
and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the
United States, than according to the rules of the common law” assures
justice as regards equity.
