The
REVISED QUESTION:
Petition
for a Writ
of Certiorari 11-8211
Motion
for a Rehearing
I sometimes feel like the
waif in “The Emperor’s New Cloths”
AM I THE ONLY ONE THAT CAN SEE
IT??
Tuesday, March 20, 2012, 7:36:40 AM
“The Evidence”[2] and “The
Wrong,”[3]
the basis of my injury, is undisputed and irrefutable in 8 years and FOUR 8th
Circuit Federal Court Appeals cases, 07-2614, 08-1823, 10-1947 and 11-2425 and
can be reviewed in detail there.
The
REVISED QUESTION:
How
can the Supreme Court,[4] “a delegated authority,”[5] acting under a constitutional commission award themselves[6] and others “absolute immunity”[7] from said constitutional commission to “do
not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid”[8] i.e.,
the “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities
secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America,”[9] by DENYING the
constitutional assurance of governmental accountability with 1st and
7th Amendment Justice, law and equity?[10]
DGJeep "The Earth and everything that's in it" (www.dgjeep.blogspot.com)
Tuesday,
March 20, 2012, 7:36:40 AM, 2012 03-17-12 The REVISED QUESTION REV 99RX
[1] Mr. Thompson in
the New York Times in response to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Connick,
District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011
[4] “The Judges, both of the supreme and
inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour.” The Constitution for the United States of America
[5] Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers
No. 78, “The Judiciary Department” From McLEAN'S Edition, New York May 28, 17 88
[6] There are TWO constitutional prohibitions
for the grant of Nobility to wit, “Absolute Immunity,” Article 1, Section 9, 7th paragraph "No Title
of Nobility shall be granted by the United States" and Article 1, Section 10, 1st paragraph "No State shall…
grant any Title of Nobility."
[7] “absolute immunity from subsequent damages
liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral
parts of the judicial process.” Briscoe
v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) @ Page
460 U. S. 335
[8] Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers
No. 78, “The Judiciary Department” ibid.
[10] Justice without regard to equity
impoverishes the victim at the expense of the evil they have suffered. I have been forced into poverty, homelessness
for FOUR YEARS! The 1st
Amendment secures the constitutional right to a lawfully un-abridge-able
justifiable redress of grievance from the government: “Congress shall make no law abridging the right of the people to petition the
Government for a redress of grievances.” The 7th
Amendment secures the right to settle all suits: “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed
twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved,
and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the
United States, than according to the rules of the common law” assures
justice as regards equity.
