US First Class Mail March 26, 2012
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan,
Sonia Sotomayor, and Stephen Breyer
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543-0001
Re: The FEAR MONGERS
Awhile back I came across what I believe to be a very apropos quote from Edward R. Murrow regarding McCarthyism's fear mongering:
"We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven into an age of unreason if we dig deep into our history and remember we are not descended from fearful men."
The FEAR MONGERS that want to sell their self serving POWER assert that We the People’s Justice System, the prosecutors, the police and “the judges should be at liberty to exercise their functions with independence, and without fear of consequences.” And to deny them their absolute immunity would result in unavoidable “vexatious” or calumnious actions.
“With independence, and without fear of consequences” in Supreme Court speak means without regard to the “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America.” 
Barry Scheck, co-founder of the Innocence Project, made a very good point in a recent 60 Minutes piece “Evidence of Innocence: The case of Michael Morton” in Texas; it is not a wave of prosecutorial, police or judicial corruption. It is the YEARS of absolute unaccountability of the justice system’s judiciary, prosecutors, and police. In fact I would be willing to bet that the corruption within our Justice System statistically does not vary from the population at large. There are for the sake of argument 1/X criminals in the general population, there are I would assert exactly the same, 1/X criminals, in our justice system. The only issue is in the general population they are held accountable. In our Justice system they have virtual “absolute immunity” from personal and professional liability and “absolute immunity from subsequent damages liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process” Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 335 (1983). There victims are left with NOTHING because they impoverish their victims with their evil.
How are Mr. Morton, Mr. Thompson (No. 09–571), Mr. Smith (No. 10-8145), Mr. al-Kidd (No. 10–98) Ms. Millender (No. 10–704) and myself (USCA8 No. 11-8211) myself or the other statistically undeniable victims suppose to overcome “absolute immunity from subsequent damages liability?” The struggle has deprived me of EVERYTHING; I am absolutely destitute, living on the street for going on 5 years. I lost all but the love of my son, I lost my home, my career, my retirement and have been forced me into horrible homeless street person poverty for going on FIVE YEARS!!!! This is crazy, our justice system has forgotten its purpose, “Justice is the end of government. It is the end of civil society. It ever has been and ever will be pursued until it be obtained, or until liberty be lost in the pursuit.”
It is irrefutable “absolute immunity from subsequent damages liability” impoverishes the victim at the expense of the evil they have suffered. Evil always wins in such a case at the expense of the innocent. To tolerate even the slightest evil in the name of Justice is self defeating. There is no benefit from the supposed expediency of “absolute immunity” when you have to quite literally sacrifice your soul for it. The Justice system will lose what little respect it currently has if the Supreme Court continues to enforce “absolute immunity from subsequent damages liability” at the untold expense of innocent victims.
“How can the Supreme Court, a delegated authority, acting under a constitutional commission award themselves and others “absolute immunity”  from said constitutional commission to “do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid” i.e., the “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America,” by DENYING the constitutional assurance of governmental accountability with 1st and 7th Amendment Justice, law and equity?”
If there is anything I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
“Time is of the essence”
David G. Jeep
a. “The FEAR MONGERS In We the People’s Justice System And on The Supreme Court” Tuesday, March 26, 2012
cc: My Blog - Monday, April 1, 2012
 Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 349 (1871) “prevent them (our judges and justice system) being harassed by vexatious actions,” in all cases it is the judiciary’s responsibility to avoid “vexatious” or calumnious actions to the best of their ability not concede to their inevitability. “Vexatious” or calumnious actions are hazards in any human endeavor,
 Floyd and Barker (1607) “And those who are the most sincere, would not be free from continual Calumniations,” in all cases it is the judiciary’s responsibility to avoid “vexatious” or calumnious actions to the best of their ability not concede to their inevitability. “Vexatious” or calumnious actions are hazards in any human endeavor,
“In addressing the consequences of subjecting judges (and/or “all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process" Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983)) to suits for damages under § 1983, the Court has commented:
"Imposing such a burden on judges would contribute not to principled and fearless decision making but to intimidation."
 See also USCA8 #07-2614, #08-1823, #10-1947 and Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court #07-11115
 FEDERALIST No. 51, The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments For the Independent Journal. Wednesday, February 6, 1788. James Madison
 No. 11-8211, Title: David G. Jeep, Petitioner v. Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. Docketed: January 10, 2012, Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, Case Nos.:(11-2425) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 13, 2012.
 Alexander Hamilton June of 1788 at the ratification of the Constitution for the United States of America, The Federalist Papers No. 78, “The Judiciary Department”
 Justice without regard to equity impoverishes the victim at the expense of the evil they have suffered. I have been forced into poverty, homelessness for FOUR YEARS! The 1st Amendment secures the constitutional right to a lawfully un-abridge-able justifiable redress of grievance from the government: “Congress shall make no law abridging the right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” The 7th Amendment secures the right to settle all suits: “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law” assures justice as regards equity.