Re: Petition for Writ of Certiorari - Jeep v United States of America
Supplement - I got the receipts.
Dear People,
I am watching the January 6th hearing recap. I am not "detached from reality." I am not the crazy one here. I have TWO independent psychiatric certifications of my competency. I am not carrying gun, I have never owned a gun, never need one. I believe in the inescapable NEED for the rule of LAW! And I got the receipts.
In the United States of America 1960 - 1 in 20 (5%) children grew up without a father in the home. In 2014 the FATHERLESS rate had increased to 1 in 2 ½ (40%). "Anything that spikes from 5 percent to 40 percent is a big change. But when you're talking about something as elemental as family structure — what does that mean?"[1] It means that "Jane Crow" discrimination is REAL in the United States of America today! Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America! And I got the receipts.
"It doesn't take a cynic to point out that when a woman is getting a divorce, what she may truly fear is not violence, but losing the house or kids. Under an exparte order of protection, if she's willing to fib[2] to the judge and say she is "in fear" of her children's father, she will get custody and money and probably the house."
A fait accompli, "A man against whom a frivolous exparte order of protection has been brought starts to lose any power in his divorce proceeding. They do start decompensating, and they do start to have emotional issues, and they do start developing post-traumatic stress disorders. They keep replaying in their minds the tape of what happened to them in court. It starts this whole vicious downward cycle. They've been embarrassed and shamed in front of their family and friends, unjustly, and they totally lose any sense of self-control and self-respect." "The Booming Domestic Violence Industry" - Massachusetts News, 08/02/99, By John Maguire, Hitting below the belt Monday, 10/25/99 12:00 ET, By Cathy Young, Salon - Divorced men claim discrimination by state courts, 09/07/99, By Erica Noonan, Associated Press, Dads to Sue for Discrimination, 08/24/99, By Amy Sinatra, ABCNEWS.com, The Federal Scheme to Destroy Father-Child Relationships, by Jake Morphonios, 02/13/08. (AND I GOT THE RECEIPTS.)
The RECEIPTS:
1. The statute (MRS 455.035) clearly states as a REQUIREMENT "a verified petition" that has "good cause shown in the petition" i.e., an "immediate and present danger of domestic violence."
2. The original petition for ex parte order of protection (11/3/03) did NOT even check the boxes for abuse and/or threat of abuse much less present an "immediate and present danger of domestic violence." And I got the receipts.
3. Now in the original ex parte petition, "Box 7." the petitioner did declare her intentions to file for divorce[3] and she thought it would be easier if I was out of the way.
4. At the service of this order I (respondent) noted this DEFICIENCY and the police officer laughed in my face. And I got the receipts.
5. At the scheduling hearing (11/13/03) and the case hearing (11/20/03) and in TWO subsequent motions (12/5/03 and 12/19/03 (+/-)) the respondent's (my) attorney noted this unconstitutionality and statutory deficiency for the RECORD to the court. And I got the receipts.
6. I thought my PAID attorney could enforce my rights. I thought I had the JUDICIAL system to protect me. I thought my rights were WORTH something[4]. And I got the receipts.
7. I have been at this for nearly 20 years, with 411 days in jail, 2 independent psychological exams and 8 Petitions for Writ of Certiorari through the District, Circuit and Supreme Court of the United States fighting in defense of my rights, my son's rights and every man alive in United States's rights. And I got the receipts.
I say this for the ORIGINALIST judiciary and the historians in the audience. In the 18th Century in England and their Colonies the royalist's judiciary's "General Warrants" were much despised. The Royals Judiciary used them liberally against enemies of the crown. They were outlawed by Parliament in 1766 and the particulars of the Constitution of the United States of America's 4th Amendment in 1789. "We the People" fought several wars and invested millions of lives to establish self-government and RID OURSELVES of the dictates of royals and/ or a royalist absolutely immune "Star Chamber" judiciary.
Now I support the concept of the ex parte order of protection as statutorily and constitutionally conceived. There are abuser in violent domestic relations.
But I do not accept unconstitutional would-be royalist using "general warrants" that defy both statute and the Unites States Constitution's 4th Amendment. And I got the receipts.
I have the RECEIPTS. I have presented THE evidence of the Royalist Unconstitutional General Warrants to the ROYALIST State Missouri Courts and EIGHT[5] times through the ROYALIST Federal, District, Circuit and Supreme Court of the United States of America. In 20 years, I have paid my dues. I spent 411 days in jail. I was subjected to TWO independent psychological exams, before the federal ROYALIST found me sane and dismissed all charges. And I got the receipts.
I am DEMANDING redress of damages $100,000,000.00 (One Hundred Million Dollars and No Cents), AFTER any all Trump Taxes for redress of 20+/- years of TORTURE, struggle, and deprivation of rights (42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985). And I got the receipts.
If there is anything further in this regard, please let me know. And I got the receipts.
Thank you in advance.
David G. Jeep
enclosure (to John G. Roberts, Jr., $300 US Postal Money Order for court fees)
cc: John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States, Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Stephen G. Breyer, Associate Justice, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice, Sandra Day O'Connor (Retired), Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice David H. Souter (Retired), Associate Justice
www.DGJeep.com
file
[1] "The Economics of Non-Marital Childbearing and The "Marriage Premium for Children"," Melissa Kearney and Phillip Levine (2017), Male Earnings, Marriageable Men, and Nonmarital Fertility: Evidence from the Fracking Boom (2017) JULY 5, 2017, EPISODE 294, FREAKONOMICS, The Fracking Boom, a Baby Boom, and the Retreat From Marriage," Are Children "Normal"?" (2013), "Births to Unmarried Women," Child Trends ( 2016), "An Economic Analysis of Fertility," Gary Becker (1960),
[2] It takes more than a just a fib of POTENTIAL abuse, it take sworn statement of ABUSE in the state of Missouri
[3] She also wanted to clandestinely start my son on "Atomoxetine (Strattera) a man-made selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor medicine, that increases the amount of norepinephrine in the brain" Two month later she filed for divorce.
[4] Criminal 18 U.S.C. § 241 &; 242 and Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985
Thanks in advance...
"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')
David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)
www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com
Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message
David G. Jeep
1531 Pine St Apt #403
St. Louis, MO 63103-2547
No comments:
Post a Comment