Sunday, October 19, 2008

Terrorism 101, liberty must be refreshed... with the blood of patriots and tyrants - Revised 10-19-08

-->
Sun, October 19, 2008 3:51:57 PM
Terrorism 101, liberty must be refreshed... with the blood of patriots and tyrants - Revised 10-19-08

...
From:            David G. Jeep ...View Contact

To:    Mike Christian at 314-280-5222 FBI Report ; SAMUEL A. ALITO JR. ; RUTH BADER GINSBURG ; STEPHEN G. BREYER ; SANDRA DAY O’CONNOR ... more        

Cc:    Kenny Hulshof ; Jay Nixon ; Sarah Steelman ; Sarah Steelman ; Joe Biden ; Joe Biden ; Kit Bond ... more     

 Subject: Terrorism 101, liberty must be refreshed... with the blood of patriots and tyrants  - Revised 10-19-08

Mike & The Supreme Court,

The Tree of Liberty

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.[1]"
Due Process of Law is the guardian, the source and the agreed meeting place for all disputes concerning our liberty in a free and civilized society.  If we give up on Due Process of Law, the law of survival once again takes root, there are no holds barred, violence and destruction follow.  The Law as agreed by all in a free state, defines and gives width and breadth to our liberty. 
But when Due Process of Law is disregarded in a free and democratic union of equal persons; it is like breaking the back of the union.  It can not stand for long if at all.
As Thomas Jefferson said “A strict observance of the written law is doubtless one of the highest duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest.  The Laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation.[2]”  This is about necessity.  This is about self-preservation; my son was taken from me illegally by the Black Robed Royals denial of my right to Due Process of Law.  This is about “saving our union” from the Royalist Black Robed judges bent on replacing Due Process of Law with their will alone.  Again, Thomas Jefferson “We have long suffered under the base prostitution of the law to party passion in one judge and the imbecility of another.  In the hands of one the law is nothing more than an ambiguous text, to be explained by his sophistry into any meaning which may subserve his personal malice.[3] 
I want to say, first, last and always, I have attempted for FIVE years to peacefully assert my unalienable rights as a father, as a person, as a Citizen of the United States of America.  All I have ever asked for is Due Process of Law as defined by the rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws: the 4th, 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution and the US Code of Law Title 18 § 1621 Perjury generally, § 1622. Subornation of perjury, § 1623 False declarations before grand jury or court,  § 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law and Title 42 § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights as declared on my Writ of Certiorari (07-11115) and in my 8th Circuit Court of Appeals action  (08-1832 Jeep v Bennett).  Without the “sovereign immunity” unconstitutionally asserted by the judiciary and others.
This did not start out as me against the world.  This started out as “the bright idea” of a disgruntled teenager and a green behind the ears traffic cop.  My ex-stepdaughter, cried “Wolf” over and over again until all around her were tired of her screams.  There was a family meeting, which she was privy to, her grandmother, her aunts and uncles, her mother, her father and I agreed she would move out on her own in the spring 2003, if she again flunked and/or dropped out of college in her fourth semester.  She flunked/dropped out.  She then moved out in the spring of 2003.  She was 20 years old.  This after nearly flunking out of her senior year in high school (2001) and subsequently flunking out of college four semester’s straight (2002 & 2003), incurring thousands of dollars debt, never even attempting to pay it back. 
Then in October 2003 after moving out,  after losing her job, her car broken beyond repair, her being thrown out of her friend’s mother’s 2 bedroom townhouse where she had been squatting rent free for four months with four of the friend’s family members I agreed to let her move back in under the same established and written rules[4] that were in effect when she flunked out her last semester in college and had moved out the previous spring (June 2003). 
My ex-wife, on the advice of her daughter, my ex-stepdaughter, then filed a fraudulent / bogus petition for an Ex-Parte Order of Protection in November 2003 i.e., “Everybody does it, the court is a push over, you need not even claim abuse to get a man thrown out of his own home.” 
IT CAN BE DONE; I AM LIVING PROOF!!!
I was literally blindsided by it.  I immediately consulted an attorney who told me the Order was deficient on the face of it.  It would never stand up in court; it asserted no probable cause, no issue.  But I assured him, I assure you there was no probable cause.  The court should never have accepted the application for the order; the application should never have been signed and ordered by a judge, and thus the police should never have enforced it.  We should not even have had to show up in court. 
Of course none of this was an issue in the Divorce, lol.  An Exparte Order of protection is “independent of any proceedings for dissolution of marriage, legal separation, separate maintenance and other actions between the parties and are in addition to any other available civil or criminal remedies, unless otherwise specifically provided herein[5].” I liken it to a foot race, where the referee breaks your leg at the start and then tells you, “Don’t worry this will not effect you legally”, but it is a given that you lose the race.  I legally lost the divorce, my son, and my home.   Does that sound anything like the outdated legal premise we are going to keep things “separate but equal”???[6]
I can get the school transcripts, I have signed letters of agreement and other supporting paperwork.  If I was or had been given a chance with Due Process of Law, in a court of law as defined by the rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, I could prove the FRAUD that started it all.   Due Process of Law is not currently an assertable right in the U.S. of A.
My lawyer of record at the time of the Ex-Parte Order made the comment, after the fact, his mistake was in allowing me to even go to court on the issue.  He should never have let, the would be gold diggers have a shot at me.  I could not hold him responsible.  We were good honest people with nothing to hide.  We thought we had Due Process of Law, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the 14th Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1871 now codified into the US Code of Law as Title 42 The Public Health and Welfare § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights to protect us, why should we worry.  The Law should not be about chicanery, sophistry unbridle enmity and falsehood.  The goal of Due Process of Law should be the unembellished truth.
But none the less my rights be dammed, my son was taken away, I was force out of my home and into appeal.
I learned the HARD WAY. As I can now prove and as I have stated over and over again, we do not have RIGHTS.  We, you, me and the guy or gal next to you are at the complete discretion of any would be judge, judge, policeman or prosecutor.  The first thing that happens is Due Process of Law is thrown out the window.  Your accused you have NO ENFORCABLE RIGHTS.  They can throw you in jail, they can take away your home, your son, everything you once held as sacred and all you can do is appeal.  Appeals are EXTRMELY costly and very time consuming to say the least.  But an appeal is a complete waist of TIME, if you allege a civil rights issue!!!!  We have no CIVIL RIGHTS in the court of the Black Robed Royalist.  Now I have spent 5 years appealing these issues to the Supreme Court of the United States.  The Supreme Court on October 6, 2008 denied my petition.  The Supreme concurs; we have no civil rights.
I did it “ProSe” because with $80,000 in my pocket I could not get a lawyer to stand up for my rights.  There is no REAL money in Civil rights.  It has cost me everything, my son, my home, my retirement, my career, EVERYTHING.  We have no rights after the Rehnquist Revolution.  We are at the discretion of the Royals in their Black Robes of “Sovereign Immunity.”
Everybody wants to curtail the rights of criminals, that is a given.  The problem is how do you do that without curtailing the rights of the “non-criminals” also?  And the ONLY answer to that question is Due Process of Law as defined by our rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.  In this country we have Rights.  A Right - something that one may properly claim as due i.e., “knowing the truth is her right”.  Rights are RIGHTS and everybody has them from cradle to grave, there is no getting around it.
The Warren Court, The Rehnquist Court
and the Current Supreme Court
The Warren Court sought to curtail Government Abuses of Civil rights by letting criminals go free with the exclusionary rule (Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)).  If the only evidence had been obtained illegally, the criminals went free regardless.  Did that hurt the people that had illegally stolen said rights, the police, judges, and prosecutors…. NO.  That hurt society by allowing the criminal to go free, to do as they pleased once again. 
The Rehnquist Court reversed the Warren Court by formally allowing judges personal discretion as regards civil rights in general i.e., Due Process of Law, pretrial confinement, the exclusionary rule.  And now we live at the whim of judges, the Royals in Black Robes with their “Sovereign Immunity.”   We have no rights we can assert that take precedence over the whims of the Black Robed Royals.  And I can say indisputably, they abuse their power. 
In the generalities of common law, if your neighbor takes your property, that is a crime, theft.  If your neighbor locks you in his prison that is a crime, false imprisonment.
Again in the generalities of common law, if a Judge takes your property via Due Process of Law i.e., the rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, that is legal.  If a Judge locks you up in prison via Due Process of Law i.e., the rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, that is legal.
Once more in the generalities of common law if a Judge takes your son/property via THE DENIAL of Due Process of Law i.e., THE DENIAL of the rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, that is THEFT and also a crime per Title 18 § 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law.  If a Judge locks you up in prison via THE DENIAL of Due Process of Law i.e., THE DENIAL the rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, that is THEFT and also a crime per Title 18 § 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
A Judge’s power comes from the rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.   If they operate outside of the rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States they are just as much a criminal if not more so than a thief in the night with a gun.[7]
And it follows that any victim of a crime has the common law civil right to sue for the damages resulting from the criminal act i.e., for those acting “under color of law” Title 42 The Public Health and Welfare § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights
What the Warren Court and the Rehnquist Court should have done and the Current Supreme Court should do now is enforce the laws already on the books, the Civil Rights Act of 1871 now codified into the US Code of Law as Title 42 The Public Health and Welfare § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights and associated Criminal and Civil Laws assuring Civil Rights.  This would in effect nullify “the “sovereign immunity” unconstitutionally asserted by the judiciary” and return the civil rights to “We the People”.  It would make it profitable to establish and reinforce the rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws. 
So yes illegally obtained evidence could be used at the discretion of a judge, but also the one who broke the law by obtaining or fabricating the evidence illegally could and should be punished criminally and civilly as well.  As regards the potential for a Criminal to thus profit from the crime, again Common Law would dictate that any monies acquired be forfeit to the actual victims of the crime and/or a general fund for that purpose.  Criminals can not be allowed to profit by their crimes.  This would in effect clear up the issue and allow for the assignment blame where it belongs on both parties.   We can not allow the police, the prosecutors or the JUDGES to disregard OUR RIGHTS!
I was reading a book by Alan Dershowitz; he related the change in the way pretrial confinement was being handled.  When we had rights, a judge always had to set reasonable bail commensurate with the crime.  But in the new era without rights a Judge need no longer set bail if he believes the innocent until proven guilty suspect maybe a risk to society.  And given that the elected Judge has the choice between setting bail, allowing a suspect his rights and potentially risking a mistake or keeping the suspect in jail.  Most judges do not allow bail and keep the suspects confined and thus do not risk the political fall out of having been wrong.  Thus too many suspects are being denied bail because of the self-serving overly conservative viewpoint of judges.  
I am now aware and ashamed that the Civil Rights Act of 1871, was never let out.  I was unaware and am now ashamed that we have allowed nearly 140 years of Civil Rights abuse and this law has had so little use.  Now I am not claiming any broad based discrimination in my case, what has created my issues are incompetence, fraud and the accompanying criminal cover-up.   My cases are the exception if anything to the rule for civil rights issues, but I am sure my cases are not without companions. If the Federal Courts had ENFORCED the Civil Rights Act of 1871, let the Free Enterprise system take care of its own and made it profitable for lawyers to look after the rights of the newly emancipated African Americans, we would not have had near the issues with Racial in equality, Discrimination, Racial Violence, Jim Crow, Internment of the Japanese during WWII, Separate but Equal: Segregation in the Public Schools, Civil Rights Riots of the 60’s, the Rodney King, Los Angeles riots of 1992 or MY PROBLEMS.  I can assure you that the judges, the prosecutors and the police would be well trained as to the rights of the Citizens they are all sworn to protect and serve.  It is amazing what profit and loss can make happen.
One of the purported reasons for not allowing the Civil Rights Act of 1871 for general use is that it would open up an unwanted “can of worms”.  Nobody wants a can of stinky old worms but that does not make the problem go away.  This can of worms has been kept under wraps for 140 years, and it is about to explode all over.
Tell Me Again Why I Shouldn’t Blow Up a “Murrah Federal Building[8]
“We the People” have waited long enough.  Statistically there are undeniably abuses from sheer incompetence.  Hiding the issue behind a wall of immunity does not make the issue go away, it just cover up the problem and forces it into a critical mass.  Everybody knows those acting under color of law[9] are subject to human fallibility just like the rest of us.  Should the those acting “under color of law” be allowed to continue to live in the unreal world of immunity at the expense of their unwitting victims???  I say NO!!!!! And I ask WHY HAVE THEY BEEN????
There will be issues of fraudulent claims, but Legal procedure has always been about, documentation, documentation.  In this day and age of electronic documentation, video cameras in police cars and audio if not video transcripts of all court proceedings there should be little chance for fraud.  I have the written transcript in hand of, the would be judge, Commissioner Jones’s unashamed procedural denial of my rights.  I have the transcript trial record of the wet behind the ears Policemen brazenly giving false testimony; there can be no issue of fraud.[10]  Our system does very well with Documentation, Documentation, nothing can be easily disputed.  In my cases, I have the evidence and it is indisputable.
My PROBLEMS, I am not talking about some obscure, sophistic, nit-picking interpretation of a contrived non-enumerated right.  All I am asking for is a word for word realistic honest reading of Our Constitution and Laws nothing too obscure or between the lines:
1.     I want the original order/warrant as referenced in my Wirt of Certiorari vacated per the 4th Amendment to the constitution, “no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation”.  there was NO PROBABLE CAUSE LISTED.
2.     I want the subsequent order to the above referenced order vacated per the 5th Amendment, “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment”.  There never was and there has never been a presentment of the Specific charges.  NOT before the hearing As required by the constitution nor a presentment of the specifics of the charges subsequent to the hearing.
3.     I want all orders and findings regarding child custody and property settlement related to the dissolution of marriage (SGJeep v DGJeep) and subsequent to the above referenced orders vacated per the 14th Amendment “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”   My son, my life and my property were all taken away from me fruadulently and illegally immediately prior to the orders and findings regarding child custody and property settlement related to the dissolution of marriage there is no way it was fair.
4.     As regards my appeal 08-1832 Jeep v Bennett, I want the laws for Perjury, Criminal Conspiracy and Criminal Malfeasance in Office enforced against those involved in the fraudulent conviction.  I want the conviction vacated.  The Police, The Prosecutors, and the Judge all HAD Knowledge of the fraudulent and perjurious testimony.  the JUDGe in particular had Knowledge prior to sentencing and refused to act in favor of Truth and Justice.  
5.     I want my rights, as a result of the above issues, in a fair and open court of law before a jury, as the damaged party in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, per the United States Code of Law Title 42 § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights.
6.     And again, “Without the “sovereign immunity” unconstitutionally asserted by the judiciary.”
There has been some feedback, but nothing from the court.   I really, really want to settle this per due process of law.  But in lieu of that I am still holding open the two other offers before I do anything further:
1. A fight to the death on the East Lawn of the Federal Court House in St. Louis with the Justices, excusing of course, Ms. Justice Ginsberg.
2. Impeachment per my Indictment dated 10/10/08 of the Full Current and Past Supreme Courts for dereliction of duty in regard to their judicial responsibilities as regards the enforcement of the US Code Title 18 § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law and Title 42 § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights as declared.  It is obscene to think how little those laws have been enforced since there enactment in 1871 as regards all parties known to be damaged, i.e. African-Americans (Post Civil War and currently), Chinese American/Immigrants (transcontinental railroad),  Japanese Americans (World War II internment), Mexican Americans (Current), Arab American (Current) and Me (as referenced above) to name but a few.
America hangs its self worth on its
belief in its good name.
America hangs its self worth on its belief in its good name.   We like to believe that the terrorists of this world are despots and the despots of this world would never be tolerated by America.  And that is so, so, so very wrong.  When queried virtually any American would resist the assertion that we honor terrorists and genocidal despotic leaders in our version of history.
But as our judicial friends like to rely, our much heralded history is not without precedent for terrorism and despotism.
Our view of history and the world has been sanitized and distorted by our self-promoting perspective.  For example history relates a series of incidents in pre-Revolutionary time (1768 and 1773)
In 1768 a privately owned ship was impounded by government customs officials at Boston Harbor, on a charge of running contraband goods.  A group stormed the government customs post, burned the government boat, and beat the officers to take the ship back.
In 1773 again the owner of the same ship with armed men boarded his legally sanctioned competitor’s commercial shipping vessels, supposedly under the protection of the harbormaster, and systematically emptied the holds of three of those ships (342 casks or 90,000 lbs (45 tons)) of their civilian cargo and destroyed it.  Now that this happened without violence is a stretch of the imagination, but let’s go along with our account of history and say ok, somebody got paid off to let it happen.
Who did this?  It was the Al Capone, the colonial “Godfather” of the era.  You see these ships with their government sanctioned and approved cargo were going to cut into this terrorist’s criminal smuggling business.  He had the market cornered and was making money hand over fist illegally with his smuggling.  He did not want the competition.
This was clearly an act of a criminal, a smuggler, a terrorist.  He wanted to scare them off, the Government and his competition from regulating or competing with his criminal activity, his smuggling trade.
The Owner of the ship, the smuggler, the criminal, the terrorist was John Hancock and the terrorist actions beating the government officials and destroying the private non-military cargo is often referred to as the “Boston Tea Party”, approximately $2,000,000 worth of goods, 1/3 of the yearly consumption of the colonies.
John Hancock was subsequently arrested on several charges of smuggling; his friend and supporter John Adams, the future 2nd President of the United States defended him.   John Hancock called his ship “Liberty”, “Libertine” would have been more apt.
Possibly the biggest and most impactful terrorist act of all time was the dropping of the Atom bomb that ended World War II.  That was a pure and unapologetic act of TERRORISM, the reverberation of it are still felt today.  Was it a good thing, History has so far agreed, it ended the war with fewer casualties on both sides than resulted from the bomb.  But it was and is TERROR.  In the back of every Islamic extremist’s head today, they are afraid we will do it to them.  They live in ignorance but complete and abject terror.
Our history, imagine if Hitler instead of attempting genocide on the Jews in the seclusion of camps via gas chambers, had paraded them on a forced starvation march of annihilation from the temperate climate at the tip of Italy, over the Alps and through Germany to the port of Hamburg for deportation from Europe in the dead of winter.  And as it happen the Port of Hamburg was frozen in when they arrived and the surviving victims of this starvation parade and attempted genocide had to await the spring thaw on shore without shelter at the mercy of the German winter with only the minimal food and clothing they had started the trip with in temperate Southern Italy.
That is a very accurate representation of what Presidents Jackson did and Van Buren aided in doing to the last "Five Civilized Tribes" of American Indians in Georgia, Carolina and Florida.  Jackson as the instigator and first and foremost perpetrator with the Indian Removal Act in 1830-1837, over the objections of the Supreme Court (Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832)), and Van Buren as the one finishing it with the Cherokee Nation and the Trail of Tears in 1838.  President Jackson ignored the Supreme Court to commit Genocide can’t I ignore them to get my rights as a Father, as person and as a Citizen of the untied States?????[11]
Imagine still, if Germany wanted to keep Hitler’s picture on their twenty-dollar bill?[12]  
And in answer to your subliminal question, and in response to my rhetorical question Tell Me Again Why I Shouldn’t Blow Up a “Murrah Federal Building[13]   I would RE-state that my unalienable natural rights to my son have been violated not to mention my constitutionally guaranteed rights to Due Process of Law and life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  I have invested my life in pursuit of a peaceful solution, 5 years.  My son had just started third grade, he is in eighth grade now.  We missed out on Cub Scouts, Boy Scouts, little legal sports, and so many things I can’t even begin to contemplate without tears in my eyes. 
Tell Me Again Why that does not empower me to act as supported by historical and legal precedent of our fore father's terrorist action in Boston on Thursday, December 16, 1773, as outlined by words in our Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, The Revolutionary War, In Japan in 1945,  as Thomas Jefferson asserted “"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.[14]"”and as an Open and Public Act and Declaration of War, in defense of OUR unalienable rights. 
I am not seeking to bring about Genocide like the Hero President Jackson we glorify on our twenty-dollar bill. 
I am asking for a Father’s NATURAL right to his son, a United States of America Citizen’s rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws and a person’s right to defend and or recover his home and property via Due Process of Law.  Is that too much in a free and democratic country such as ours???  Without the “sovereign immunity” unconstitutionally asserted by the judiciary.”
This following is just idle prattle, but if we have to go to war beyond anything referenced above, and I TRULY, TRULY hope we never do. 
Three hypothetical scenarios you might consider.  Not that I would ever seriously consider them.  Give me an hour and I could come up with 6 more because as in revolutionary times, it need not be strictly a Government target.
1. Eradicated on advice of Counsel. [15]


2. Eradicated on advice of Counsel.[16]


3. Eradicated on advice of Counsel. [17]


“The unexamined life is not worth living.”
Socrates
Now these are just the idle pondering of a “what if” scenario on a Sunday[18] afternoon in response to your hypothetical question how would I if indeed I wanted to.  Not that I would ever want to!!!!  I make no serious plans for the future; I am at War.  But, I couldn't see any of them taking too much time or costing more than the price of an old pickup truck, not even that if I found one someplace?
And again, I will have to warn you, I have had feed back, not from the court as I had hoped, not from anyone I contacted, nothing in writing.  The cat is out of the bag.  And as we all know, Timothy McVey’s motivation was the incidents at Ruby Ridge, Waco Texas and others.  Timothy McVey never had any direct dealing or relations with either of those incidents; he just took up the cause independently, all on his own.  This is a can of WORMS that is about to explode all on it’s own.
I have struggled for FIVE YEARS on my way through the courts, unsuccessfully to reacquire my rights.  My evidence of the criminal denial of said rights by those “acting under color of law” is irrefutable.  I have been to the Mountain Top of the Supreme Court of Untied States of America.  I have written and e-mailed every news outlet I can reach.  I am homeless, I am penniless, and I am sitting here with holes in the bottom of the only pair of shoes I own as rain, snow and winter approach.  What am I to do????

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.[19]"  Does it Take blood as Thomas Jefferson asserted????

As I have said before, please I am not threatening, This is getting out of control, I am begging!!!!!!!!!!!!
“Tell Me Again Why I Shouldn’t Blow Up a
There is historical, precedence, even in our revised version history for violence in defense of liberty. As Thomas Jefferson further asserts “The Law of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation.[21].  Tell me why after 5 years of attempting to get my son, my home and justice through the courts, including the Supreme Court. There is historical precedent for ignoring the Supreme Court.[22] I am not allowed to act on the natural law of self-preservation and necessity????
For more information on these issues please see the United States 8th District Court of Appeals Appeal #08-1823 and Writ of Certiorari 07-11115 to the Supreme Court.
Thanks in advance
"Time is of the essence".
                                                                       

David G. Jeep                                                                         Thomas Jefferson[23]
Dave@DGJeep.com                                                            Noted Revolutionary and Author




[1] Thomas Jefferson in a letter to William S. Smith, 1787

[2] John Kaminiski, ed., “The Quotable Jefferson” pp 164-166

[3] May 26, 1810 a letter Thomas Jefferson to John Tyler, From “The Thomas Jefferson Papers Series1, General Correspondence, 1651-1827 (Library of Congress)

[4] I have a copy of the “House” rules if you would like to see them, nothing extreme.

[6] Italicized Text is the revision  - Revised 10-19-08

[7] Italicized Text is the revision  - Revised 10-19-08

[8] A rhetorical QUESTION, not intended as a threat, but if anyone feels the need to arrest I say come on, I would love to make this into a freedom of speech issue also.

[9] See the US Department of justice Website for a definition of Under Color of Law http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/crim/242fin.htm

[10] Italicized Text is the revision  - Revised 10-19-08

[11] Italicized Text is the revision  - Revised 10-19-08

[12] Suggestion, take Jackson off put Martin Luther King or Chief Joseph on the twenty-dollar bill

[13] A rhetorical QUESTION, not intended as a threat, but if anyone feels the need to arrest I say come on, I would love to make this into a freedom of speech issue also.

[14] Thomas Jefferson in a letter to William S. Smith, 1787

[15] Eradicated per counsel’s suggestion

[16] Eradicated per counsel’s suggestion

[17] Eradicated per counsel’s suggestion

[18] 10-12-08

[19] Thomas Jefferson in a letter to William S. Smith, 1787, Thomas Jefferson and I stand ready to be arrested for threatening revolution.

[20] A rhetorical QUESTION, not intended as a threat, but if anyone feels the need to arrest I say come on, I would love to make this into a freedom of speech issue also.

[21] John Kaminiski, ed., “The Quotable Jefferson” pp 164-166

[22] Italicized Text is the revision  - Revised 10-19-08

[23] Thomas Jefferson’s signature is included for visual effect only, he of course did not sign the document above, but I feel he would have liked to.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Post a Comment