Wednesday, March 11, 2009

I was Arrested in violation of my First Amendment Right to Free Speech... for asking for my rights

I had requested “the Protection of the Law” per my Civil Rights via a quote from the FBI Mission Statement (Charged as Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP):
“The FBI is the lead agency for investigating violations of federal civil rights laws…and we take that responsibility seriously.” The FBI speaks specifically to these issues as they define their mission as it relates to civil rights “under color of law”. I again quote “U.S. law enforcement officers and other officials like judges, prosecutors, and security guards have been given tremendous power by local, state, and federal government agencies—authority they must have to enforce the law and ensure justice in our country. These powers include the authority to detain and arrest suspects, to search and seize property, to bring criminal charges, to make rulings in court, and to use deadly force in certain situations.
Preventing abuse of this authority, however, is equally necessary to the health of our nation’s democracy. That’s why it’s a federal crime for anyone acting under “color of law” willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution or U.S. law. (bolding added) “Color of law” simply means that the person is using authority given to him or her by a local, state, or federal government agency.”

I was charged under:
18 U.S.C. § 2 provides:
(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.
(b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.
Whoever transmits in interstate commerce any communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of another, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

This was a violation of my Civil Rights per the US Supreme Court, United States of America, Appellee, v. Russell Kelner, Appellant, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. - 534 F.2d 1020 Argued Oct. 29, 1975.Decided April 9, 1976, “The purpose and effect of the Watts constitutionally-limited definition of the term "threat" is to insure that only unequivocal, unconditional and specific expressions of intention immediately to inflict injury may be punished only such threats, in short, as are of the same nature as those threats which are, as Judge Wright recognizes, "properly punished every day under statutes prohibiting extortion, blackmail and assault without consideration of First Amendment issues." Watts v. United States, 394 U.S. 705 (1969), supra. The Watts requirement of proof of a "true threat," it may be seen, works ultimately to much the same purpose and effect as would a requirement of proof of specific intent to execute the threat because both requirements focus on threats which are so unambiguous and have such immediacy that they convincingly express an intention of being carried out.

I spent 411 day in federal custody denied my liberty and basic human rights, subject to the humiliation and intimidation of County Jail incarceration. 
I was released in the dark of night 24 miles from the site wear I had been arrested in homeless shelter on to the streets of down town St. Charles Missouri in the rain, penniless and wearing prison clothing 

What I wrote, A SAMPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

A Card-Carrying Pacifist

A Card-Carrying Pacifist
First published February 10, 2009

Why did Cookie snap? What did Cookie do, he had struggled and worked to own his own home. He had struggled and worked the American Dream to own his own business.

Civil Rights and Judicial Terrorism

To the FBI, A Demand for an affirmative response on or before March 16, 2009

No comments: