Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Thank you for your time this morning – Revised and extended 11/02/10 Where are we John Brown, Fredrick Douglas’s Madison Washington, Ida B. Wells or Rosa Parks in the “Jane Crow” era not the “Jim Crow” era?????


Monday November 01, 2010

Robert O'Connor
Criminal Investigator U.S. Marshal Service
U. S. Department of Justice
111 South 10th Street, Suite 2-319
St. Louis, MO 63102

Phone 314-539-2023
E-Mail: Robert.OConnor@USDOJ.gov

Re: Thank you for your time this morning – Revised and extended 11/02/10
       Where are we John Brown, Fredrick Douglas’s Madison Washington, Ida B. Wells or Rosa Parks in the Jane Crow” era not theJim Crow” era?????
       Jeep v. United States of America[1]

Dear Mr. O’Connor,
The whole notion of the rule of law, critical to a democracy, is sabotaged when the guardians of the law — in this case The Police, The Prosecutors, The State Judges, Federal Officers, The Federal Judges of Osage Beach, Camden County, State of Missouri and the United States of America respectively — are permitted to violate the law with impunity.[2]
The IMPUNITY, “What did I do wrong?[3]
Ø      I was driving down the road and TWO self-professed incompetent police officer wanted to make, what they thought to be a BIG arrest, I was unfortunately the closest victim.  They knew they could get away with it because everybody does it.
Ø      I was sitting at home watching Monday Night Football my now ex-wife knowingly filed a bogus, legally deficient ex-parte order of protection ordered without statutory or constitutional basis by a Judicial Terrorist.  She knew she could get away with it because everybody does it.
Ø      I HAD DONE NOTHING WRONG.  The Judges, the prosecutors, the police and self-alleged victims do it all the time.  They can do whatever they want without the regard to our rights.  They have nothing to worry about.  They have ABSOLUTE impunity from any personal or criminal liability for the deprivation of our Constitutionally Guaranteed Civil Rights.  There is no enforcement of Civil Rights Today in the United States of America!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Those are the issues and they are undisputable.  The police were incompetent; they admitted it in their sworn police reports and on the stand under oath, the record reflects that.  The Infamous charge and the lack of good cause shown in the petition[4]” are obvious; the record reflects that.  Now granted if you have a predisposition to find men guilty of abuse you could see the possibility of abuse in a game of “ring around the rosy.”  But there was nothing that would be generally accepted “good cause shown in the petition” of abuse served on me, dated November 3, 2003.   Even though it had been reviewed by several professionals, the court provided counselor, the court clerk, the State Court Judge Goeke, the commissioner’s clerk, and Commissioner Jones who all thus retain liability for the government and afford me the First Amendment right to “petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
I was AMBUSHED and held to answer an infamous charge without the faintest clue as to probable cause much less the constitutionally and statutorily guaranteed good cause shown in the petition” ”supported by Oath or affirmation[5].”  This was a violation of my constitutional civil rights.  There was no probable cause as required by the IV Amendmentno Warrants[6] shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation,” and per statute “for good cause shown in the petition” in the presentment.  The V Amendment clearly states; “No person shall be held to answer for… (an) infamous crime, unless on a presentment.”    The presentment’s listed cause was infamous and unrelated to the infamous charge of spousal abuse of the petitioner.
Now your assertion that an order of protection is not a crime does not pass the requirement of the XIV Amendment, “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”  The XIV Amendment assurances cover any law not just criminal law.
You can lie to yourself but you cannot lie to me.
It is a known undisputed fact that Judges EMPOWER Woman, with UNEQUAL protection[7] of the law, to misuse the Order of Protection all the time.  It doesn't take a cynic to point out that when a woman is getting a divorce, what she may truly fear is not violence, but losing the house or kids. Under an Order of Protection, if she's willing to fib to the judge and say she is "in fear" of her children's father, she will get custody and money and probably the house…[8]  The record in this case supports if not proves this!
It is a known undisputed fact police are sometimes incompetent and prone to corruption and malice of Testilying[9] to cover it up.  The record in this case supports if not proves this!
It is a known undisputed fact prosecutors are sometimes negligent, sometimes malicious but always corrupt when for whatever reason they withhold exculpable evidence[10]The record in this case supports if not proves this!
EVERYBODY knows this, but nobody including yourself,
will do anything about it.
Where do I go for safety?  “There is no safety for the citizen except in the protection of the (malicious and corrupt) judicial tribunals for rights which have been invaded by the officers of the government professing to act in its name. There remains to him but the alternative of resistance, which may amount to crime.” (Non-italic and lined through editing added for clarity)(United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196 (1882) , Page 106 U. S. 219) (Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) @ 403 US 394-395).
In SEVEN years struggle against the egregious denial of my Civil Rights I have to ask myself am I John Brown who openly used violence at Harpers Ferry in 1859 to right the egregious denial of rights?  Am I Fredrick Douglas’s Madison Washington[11], that proposed violence to over-through a Slave Ship’s crew by force of arms?  Am I Ida B. Wells that wrote[12] about and resisted her oppressors or am I Rosa Parks merely resisted her oppressors and the LUCKY one that finally lived to see some REAL SUCCESS.?????  These issues to you may seem inconsequential, but you have not had to live with the shame, the humiliation, the struggle to hold on to SELF RESPECT against a malicious, corrupt and uncompassionate system to overcome the injustice for SEVEN YEARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



I am a person!!!!  I will not and cannot just fade away.
Agere sequitur esse[13].
If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.

 “Time is of the essence”


Dave@DGJeep.com



David G. Jeep

Cc: President Barack Hussein Obama, “I've had it up to BEYOND here”
       e-mailed to a select group of favorites
       file


[1] A Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, Jeep v United States of America “Opposed to Immunity” currently on file in the Supreme Court clerk’s office, 8th District Court of appeals Appeal: 10-1947, U.S. Federal Court Eastern District of Missouri Case No. Case 4:10-CV-101-TCM -- State Court Case No.: 03FC-10670M, Missouri Court of Appeals eastern District ED84021, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Missouri Jeep v. Jones et al, 4:07-cv-01116-CEJ, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 07-2614, Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115 & State Court Case # CR203-1336M, Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District SD26269, U.S. District Court Western District of Missouri 07-0506-CV-W-SOW Jeep v Bennett, et al, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 08-1823 (http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/).
[5] Constitution for the United States of America Amendment IV ratified December 15, 1791
[6] In today’s law enforcement “jargon” warrant holds a meaning that constitutionally it does not hold.  A warrant constitutionally speaking is an authorization to do something, search, seize, arrest, evict
[7] XIV Amendment, “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
[8]The Booming Domestic Violence Industry” - Massachusetts News, 08/02/99, By John Maguire, Hitting below the belt 08/24/99, By Amy Sinatra, ABCNEWS.com, The Federal Scheme to Destroy Father-Child Relationships, by Jake Morphonios, 02/13/08
[9] Testimony of Alan M. Dershowitz, House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, December 1, 1998
[10] “Suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused who has requested it violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution.” BRADY V. MARYLAND, 373 U. S. 83 (1963) Page 373 U. S. 87
[11] The fictional Character in Fredrick Douglas’s The Heroic Slave. The novella, published in 1852. 
[12] Southern Horrors, Lynch Law in All Its Phases, Ida B. Wells-Barnett, 1892–1894
[13] agere sequitur esse, action follows being, Metaphysical and moral principle that indicates the connection among ontology, obligation and ethics.
Post a Comment