Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Posted Washington Post BLOG Monday 2/28/11

Supreme Court confronts conflict between constitutional rights and protecting children

Posted Washington Post BLOG Monday 2/28/11


None of us has "the protection of the laws."   Immunity of ANY kind is DIAMETRICALLY opposed to the Rule of Law. "We the People" i.e., government of the people, by the people, for the people have established the Rule of Law, the Constitution, as the supreme Law of the land.  Yet we do not have the "the protection of the laws," Constitutional rights.  The Judiciary enforces their ministerial law granting Absolute Immunity for "the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws" and denies "We the People" "the protection of the laws," "the essence of civilization."  "Absolute Immunity" a ministerial policy adopted, supported and enforced at the highest ministerial levels of the Executive and Justice Departments is repugnant to Rule of Law, the Constitution and statute law, Civil and Criminal.

"The very essence of civil liberty certainly consists in the right of every individual to claim the protection of the laws whenever he receives an injury. One of the first duties of government is to afford that protection. In Great Britain, the King himself is sued in the respectful form of a petition, and he never fails to comply with the judgment of his court." Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 Page 5 U. S. 163


Thanks in advance,
"We live in a Lawless Society...
"Agere sequitur esse"
"Time is of the essence"
David G.Jeep  
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
E-mail is preferred Dave@DGJeep.com, DGJeep@DGJeep.com
(314) 514-5228

David G. Jeep
c/o The Bridge
1610 Olive Street,
Saint Louis, MO 63103-2316