Pat, I am OK. You are OK.
Thursday, July 17, 2025
Senator Cory Booker
306 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-3224
Fax: (202) 224-8378
Re: The Trump ISSUE
Dear People,
Saw you on MSNBC a while back asking for assistance on The Trump ISSUE. You were probably wanting financial assistance. I have been impoverished by The Trump ISSUE for almost 22 years now.
The issue with Trump has very little to do with Donald J. Trump. The issue with Trump has very little to do Bernie's and A.O.C.'s Financial Oligarchy. There is one thing and one thing alone that created Trump and will create even WORSE in the future.
I been at this for a while, longer than Trump has been just annoying. My paternity rights, my property rights and my civil rights were and have been unconstitutionally denied since November 3, 2003. It will be 22 years this fall. I have been to the incredulously named "Supreme Court[1]" 8 times[2]. I was forced into homelessness for 14 years. I spent 411 days[3] in federal custody, though I was never prosecuted. How? Why?
My issue, your issue and EVERYBODY'S issue with Trump's deepest of deep-state revolve around just one thing. Trump got elected in 2016 with a Supreme Court pick in his pocket. He then got to appoint two more. Everybody, to this DAY still wants the unconstitutional, unrepresentative, majority on a despotic Court i.e., judge-made-law.
Thomas Jefferson saw this coming in 1820:
"You seem to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so. They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps.... Their power [is] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots."(Thomas Jefferson 9/28/1820, in writing to Mr. JARVIS, from Monticello - bolding/underlining added)
From the Magna Carta in 1215 through 1641, Judges were exclusively appointed by the Monarch. In the early 1900s, Edgar Lee Masters commented on history:[19]
"In the Star Chamber the council could inflict any punishment short of death, and frequently sentenced objects of its wrath to the pillory, to whipping and to the cutting off of ears. ... With each embarrassment to arbitrary power the Star Chamber became emboldened to undertake further usurpation. ... The Star Chamber finally summoned juries before it for verdicts disagreeable to the government, and fined and imprisoned them. It spread terrorism among those who were called to do constitutional acts. It imposed ruinous fines. It became the chief defence of Charles against assaults upon those usurpations which cost him his life."
Parliament called for the "Abolition of the Star Chamber July 5, 1641 "An act for the regulating of the privy council, and for taking away the court commonly called the star-chamber." And while that was followed up in England by "Bill of Rights 1689" they by no means solved the problem of the administration of the "Common Law" for all time.
Be assured that the mistrust of the judiciary lingered on with the Founding Fathers in 1789's constitutional convention. There was never any intent in any of the originalist founding fathers to create an unrepresentative appointed for life oligarchy to explain the "common law." The founding fathers VERY much believed in the right of every-man to interpret the common law with a jury.
Sir Edward Blackstone admitted the limitation of the judiciary in his Commentaries on the Laws Of England:
"It would be right on the utilitarian scheme, even if you give the widest scope to the idea of utility, as Archdeacon Paley has done; for even the precedent, if we confine its authority (as all precedents must be) to the very case given, would not be bad."[4]
"The decrees and determinations of the magistrates are not, rigorously speaking, laws: legal precedents ought therefore not despotically to govern, but discreetly to guide."[5]
"It is not possible to lay down, with mathematical precision, any rule in regard to the authority of precedents. Every judge and every court must consider that their function is jus aïcere and not jus dare."[6]
Plato[7], Sir Edward Blackstone[8], Alexander Hamilton, and Chief Justice John Marshal all aspired to the nobility of philosopher kings. But again, "The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots."
Chief Justice Marshal was an honorable man, he never exploited the judicial sophistry he created in Marbury [9]. Marshal aspired to Blackstone's jus aïcere (declare the law) but did not include his limitation of not jus dare (make the law). Chief Justice Roger Taney then started the Civil War by creating judge-made-law with Scott[10] negros were "so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect."
There is no Constitutional premise for immunity from the Constitution, or the laws derived from it. In fact immunity from the constitution is antithetical to the premise of a constitution's raison d'etre. For the first nearly 100 years that preceded Randall and Bradley (1776-1868) there was neither need nor questions regarding Judicial Immunity and then TWO despotic precedents within 5 years. Randall v. Brigham, 74 U. S. 536 (decided April 15, 1869)[11] in response to the criminal liability in The Civil Rights Act of 1866 passed in to law April 9, 1866 and then Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (decided April 8, 1872)[12] in response to civil liability in the Civil Rights Act of 1871 passed into law April 20, 1871 are the origins of unconstitutional "immunity" in the American Justice system. Not to mention racially motivated mass murder in Blyew[13], and racially motivated pogrom in Cruikshank[14] just post-Civil War..
Judicial Immunity has since spawned reconfirmation of immunity from liability for damages for his judicial acts, see Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967), "state prosecuting attorney is absolutely immune from a civil suit for damages under § 1983 for alleged deprivations of the accused's constitutional rights" see Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976), Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) gives immunity to police officers and their informants "for giving perjured testimony at the defendant's criminal trial," and Briscoe then goes further with "absolute immunity… for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"[5] for the "deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws" see Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) @ Page 460 U. S. 335.
The issue with Trump is not his ridiculous tariff[15] policies, his disregard for 14th Amendment[16] due-process civil rights, his unashamed digital currency[17] corruption or his constant FAKE NEWS[18] distractions. Show me where in the amended constitution for the united states judge-made-law is called for or authorized? The issue with Trump is his DEEPEST[19] of a deep-state's despotic oligarchy that enables him[20]. I say again, Thomas Jefferson warned against:
"You seem to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.... The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots."(Thomas Jefferson 9/28/1820 - bolding/underlining added)"
The Article III, Judicial Department in the United States today does NOT "establish Justice"[21] as posited. Everybody has immunity for the "deprivation of rights under color of law[22]", but the Victim of the deprivation.[23] If you have the surplus income to afford unending legal representation; you can rape women promiscuously, defraud your business associates, avoid your taxes and then slander your detractors without consequences into the Presidency in the internet age.
Trump is new to you. I have been fighting the DEEPEST[24] of a deep-state's despotic oligarchy that enables him[25] for 22 years this November, see Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884, 18-5856[26] and 411 days in jail without ever being prosecuted "Charges are Dismissed without Prejudice for failure to comply with the Speedy Trial Act (Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP)[27]"
If there is anything further, please let me know.
"Time is of the essence"
Thank you in advance.
David G. Jeep
cc: www.DGJeep.com
file
[1] Article III, Section 1, "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (bolding added)." The Constitution for the United States posits one supreme Court among the many Courts NOT a Supreme Court outside the many Courts. The "judicial Power" in the Constitution for the United States is and has always been ABSOLUTELY constrained by "the most transcendent privilege which any subject can enjoy, or wish for, that he cannot be affected either in his property, his liberty, or his person, but by the unanimous consent of twelve of his neighbours and equals." (Blackstone, Sir William. Commentaries on the Laws of England: Book III: On Private Wrongs)
[2] Petition for Writ of Certioraris to the supreme Court of the United States and associated District and Circuit petitions… 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856.
[3] Charges are Dismissed without Prejudice for failure to comply with the Speedy Trial Act (Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP). https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2010/04/charges-are-dismissed-without-prejudice.html
[4] Sir William Blackstone. Blackstone 1387-01 (Kindle Locations 23314-23316).
[5] Sir William Blackstone. Blackstone 1387-01 (Kindle Locations 23802-23804).
[6] Sir William Blackstone. Blackstone 1387-01 (Kindle Locations 23832-23834).
[7] "The Republic" is a Socratic dialogue authored by Plato around 375 BC, concerning justice (dikaiosúnē), the order and character of the just city-state, and the just man.
[8] Sir William Blackstone. Blackstone 1387-01 (Kindle Locations 23832-23834). Kindle Edition.
[9] Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)
[10] Dred Scott v. Sandford,[a] 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857)
[11] RANDALL v. BRIGHAM is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 15, 1869. The case was argued before the court on April 6, 1869. President john Veto Overridden by the House and became law on April 9, 1866
[12] BRADLEY v. FISHER is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 8, 1872. The case was argued before the court on February 26, 1872. In a 6-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. Signed into law by President Ulysses S. Grant on April 20, 1871
[13] Blyew v. United States, 80 U.S. 581 (1871)
[14] United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876)
[15] Tariffs are a domestic SALES TAX on We the People. Foreign suppliers pay NO PART of tariffs. Canada, China, the E.U. and the penguins are laughing at Trump and by association the United States.
[16] The 14th Amendment "nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
[17] Stable coin digital currency has one and only one intrinsic value. Digital Currency under color of law is untraceable for pay-off and tax evasion purposes.
[18] Trump created the term "fake-news". Trump has used fake-news relentlessly and exclusively to attack his detractors with otherwise ludicrous aspersion. Trump attacked Hillary RELENTLESSLY for her use of an assertedly unprotected server. Yet Trump defends his administration's use of public bulletin boards for very time sensitive and specific tactical plans.
[19] NON-REPRESENTATIVE APPOINTED FOR LIFE.
[20] 23-939 Trump v. United States (07/01/2024) – Immunity from the Rule of Law. Why even attempt "rule of law" if anyone acting "under color of law" has immunity from the rule of law? ADDITIONALLY see Randall v. Brigham, 74 U. S. 536 (decided April 15, 1869) and Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (decided April 8, 1872)
[21] Preamble to the Constitution for the United States.
[23] This is the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's intent to establish justice!!!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html
[24] NON-REPRESENTATIVE APPOINTED FOR LIFE.
[25] 23-939 Trump v. United States (07/01/2024) – Immunity from the Rule of Law. Why even attempt "rule of law" if anyone acting "under color of law" has immunity from the rule of law? ADDITIONALLY see Randall v. Brigham, 74 U. S. 536 (decided April 15, 1869) and Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (decided April 8, 1872)
Thursday, July 24, 2025 - 12:24:44 PM
Show Me Where In The Amended Constitution For The United States Judge-Made-Law Is Called For Or Authorized?
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html
The Issue with Trump, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/tiwt.html
American Exceptionalism – NOT SO MUCH
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html
Equal Rights in a Free Market Economy
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html
A Balanced Budget for America
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html
BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president of...
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html
The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt "dark money" Senate and Electoral College
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
Small "d" Un-Democratic "dark money" Senate
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
The Judicial sophistry of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law... the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario.
The Emperor Has No Clothes.
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html
DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets
Thursday, July 24, 2025 - 12:24:44 PM
Thanks in advance...
"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')
David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)
www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com
Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message
David G. Jeep
1531 Pine St Apt #512
St. Louis, MO 63103-2548
