My "Manifesto"
Trump the Murder
Trump, "the Deplorable"
Saturday, April 4, 2026 - 9:45:10 AM
Pat, I am OK. You are OK.
"Thomas Jefferson and the supreme[1] Court"
Chief Justice John Marshall's instigation of constitutionally baseless judge-made-law was the supreme[2] Court precedent, Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803). The ruling's result was in favor of James Madison, Thomas Jefferson's then Secretary of State. Read it, it was never about winning and losing. Marbury v. Madison was a brazen unmitigated unconstitutional unauthorized political power grab for the CORRUPTION of judge-made-law.
What is tooooo often overlooked, circa 1789, the founding fathers had 654 years[3] of historical experience since the Magna Carta (1215) with judicial precedent / judge-made-law. Our self-centered ignorant recollection disparages anything prior to our assertion of enlightenment, circa 1776/1789. Yet, the prior 654 year[4] experience dwarfs the 250(+/-) years of our failed experience, outside the constitution, with Marshall's judge-made-law, since 1803.
Judge-made-law was considered yet never incorporated into the Founding Father's United States Constitution in 1789, see James Madison (Federalist Paper #47), Alexander Hamilton (Federalist Papers #78, #79 and #81).
Thomas Jefferson's oft repeated prescient negative supreme[5] Court declarations were not emotional political reactions:
"It has long been my opinion, and I have never shrunk from its expression,… that the germ of dissolution of our Federal Government is in the constitution of the Federal Judiciary–an irresponsible body (for impeachment[6] is scarcely a scare-crow), working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction[7] until all shall be usurped from the States and the government be consolidated into one. To this I am opposed." — Jefferson letter to Charles Hammond, 1821 – footnote of course added.
"(Y)you seem to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so. They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps.... Their power [is] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots." — Thomas Jefferson 28th September 1820, letter to Mr. JARVIS, from Monticello
"It is not enough that honest men are appointed judges. All know the influence of interest on the mind of man, and how unconsciously his judgment is warped by that influence. To this bias add that of the esprit de corps, of their peculiar maxim and creed that 'it is the office of a good judge to enlarge his jurisdiction,' and the absence of responsibility, and how can we expect impartial decision between the General government, of which they are themselves so eminent a part, and an individual state from which they have nothing to hope or fear?" — Thomas Jefferson Autobiography, 1821.
With us, all the branches of the government are elective by the people themselves, except the judiciary, of whose science and qualifications they are not competent judges. Yet, even in that department, we call in a jury of the people to decide all controverted matters of fact, because to that investigation they are entirely competent, leaving thus as little as possible, merely the law of the case, to the decision of the judges." — Jefferson letter to A. Coray, 1823.
(footnotes, underlining and bolding of course added)
If you are at all aware, Thomas Jefferson was the first and the last to attempt a supreme[8] Court impeachment. Judicial Impeachments under President Thomas Jefferson in the then still new constitutional government:
- John Pickering (1803-1804): A federal district judge, Pickering was impeached by the House and removed by the Senate for drunkenness and illegal rulings.
- Samuel Chase (1804-1805): A sitting Supreme Court Justice, Chase was impeached for his openly partisan, anti-Jefferson rhetoric on the bench.
The POLITICALLY based Senate[9] failed to convict Chase, which set a fundamental precedent that judicial decisions as political opinions are not grounds for removal, thereby securing judicial political corruption of judge-made-law as practicable. The Senate voted to acquit Chase of all charges on March 1, 1805.
Significance:
- Failed Strategy: While Pickering's removal was successful, the failure to remove Chase effectively ended the Jefferson's "Democratic-Republican party" attempts to use impeachment to reverse "Federalist party" corrupt political influence in the courts.
Politically construed[10] "Impeachment is a farce which will not be tried again," Jefferson stated after the failure of the Chase conviction.
I am with Thomas Jefferson….
(J)judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy….. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots." — Thomas Jefferson
Judge-made-law is a fiction. No where in the 4,000 +/- words in the 1789 Constitution for the United States or in today's much amended Constitution for the United States is judge-made-law contemplated or authorized!
What current historical understanding FAILS to admit. The founding Father had 654 years of experience of living under judicial authority. The Founding Fathers had been living under purportedly independent judicial authority since the Magna Carta 1215 (1779-1215=654). They knew firsthand that even good honest men to start, could be corrupted by the proximity to unfettered judicial power.
The idea of judge-made-law with stare decsis attach was as incomprehensible to the Founding Fathers as immunity from the constitution or the laws derived from it.
Why would the Founders even have written it down if anyone could wholesale disregard it, change it or grant immunity from it and the law derived from it??????
The last clause of the First Amendment makes any assertion of IMMUNITY unconstitutional.
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2026/02/last-clause-1a.html
The Constitution for the United States - Article I, II, and Schoolhouse Rock's[11] "I'm Just a Bill[12]" clearly define how to make law. Show me where in the amended Constitution for the United States "judge-made-law" is called for or authorized[13]?
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view
The Issue with Trump, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html
American Exceptionalism – NOT SO MUCH
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html
BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president of...
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html
The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt "dark money" Senate and Electoral College
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
The constitutional small "d" unrepresentative corrupt "dark money" Senate and Electoral College
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
The Judicial sophistry of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law... the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario.
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UmmaZmRkIUZ3EdC_9iI0Bpojr6LZ_lU0/view?usp=sharing
Petition Supreme Court website https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-5856/62608/20180904161503131_00000007.pdf
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html
DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets
"Fake News Donny"
[1] Article III of the US Constitution posits a "supreme Court" among the many courts NOT a Supreme Court outside of the many. ALL Article III Judicial power REQUIRES the assent of an instant jury.
[2] Article III of the US Constitution posits a "supreme Court" among the many courts NOT a Supreme Court outside of the many. ALL Article III Judicial power REQUIRES the assent of an instant jury.
[3] Magna Carta 1215 to the United States Construction 1779 = 654 years
[4] Magna Carta 1215 to the United States Construction 1779 = 654 years
[5] Article III of the US Constitution posits a "supreme Court" among the many courts NOT a Supreme Court outside of the many. ALL Article III Judicial power REQUIRES the assent of an instant jury.
[6] Politically based impeachment
[7] The U.S. Supreme Court overturned the 40-year-old Chevron doctrine in a 6-3 decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo on June 28, 2024. The fascist corrupt despotic oligarchy now has jurisdiction over EVERYTHING!! And ANYTHING!!
[8] Article III of the US Constitution posits a "supreme Court" among the many courts NOT a Supreme Court outside of the many. ALL Article III Judicial power REQUIRES the assent of an instant jury.
[9] Trump's multiple political acquittals are further PROOF or Jefferson's assertion "impeachment is scarcely a scare-crow"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[10] Trump's recent impeachment in his first term impeachment proves that facts be damned when the issue is purely political.
