Sunday, January 25, 2026

I feel confident Alex Pretti, was aware of the judge-made-law in Bad Elk v. United States, 177 U.S. 529 (1900).


"Fake News Donny"

Trump, "the Deplorable"

 

 

Sunday, January 25, 2026 - 2:26:34 PM

 

 

Pat, I am OK.  You are OK.

Bad Elk v. United States, 177 U.S. 529 (1900)

I feel confident Alex Jeffrey Pretti, a U.S. citizen, the latest shooting victim in Minneapolis, MN, was aware of the judge-made-law in Bad Elk v. United States, 177 U.S. 529 (1900) as he openly carried a gun at a protest, thinking he could protect himself.  I had seen the judge-made-law blazon online SEVERAL times just prior to the shooting.

I spent 411 days in federal custody without access to trial in 2009-2010 (St. Louis Post Dispatch Arrest - March 12, 2009) for a similar issue.  I had walked into the FBI office, unarmed, and merely asked the question "What do you do when the Government denies your constitutional due  process rights, use the your 2nd Amendment right?"

Now I was released after 411 days for failure to prosecute – "Charges are Dismissed without Prejudice for failure to comply with the Speedy Trial Act" (Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP).. 

But the 2nd Amendment issue was never addressed.  The 2nd Amendment as purported by M.A.G.A. and Pretti is there to allow citizens the right to defend their rights against a corrupt unconstitutional government.

Alex Jeffrey Pretti, a U.S. citizen, was on the street with a licensed firearm to peacefully protest (M.A.G.A.) I.C.E.  The "Bush League Policing[1]" of (M.A.G.A.) I.C.E. could not tolerate anyone with a gun in their presents.  (M.A.G.A.) I.C.E. assert they should be the only ones able to enforce their will with a fire arm.  (M.A.G.A.) I.C.E. would assert that a holstered loaded gun with additional magazines was a "BRANDISH THREAT to their unschooled "Bush League" authority!!!

The issue today is not Trump, not M.A.G.A., not even I.C.E..  The issue in the United States, if not all of American hemisphere, today is the lack of Justice. 

Judge-made-law TODAY has sub silentio[2] traded the "King can do no WRONG" for the ABSOLUTELY IMMUNE actions of the "malicious or corrupt" judges,[3] the "malicious or dishonest" prosecutor[4], the "knowingly false testimony by police officers"[5], the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant, conscientiously stupid actions of "all persons (spouses) -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process,"[6] the actions of federal, state, local, and regional legislators[7] and now PRESIDENTS[8] acting under color of law to render absolute corruption of inalienable constitutional rights. 

Presidents can murder on the high seas, without the authority of Law or War.  I.C.E. agents are MASKED armed criminal terrorist acting without the authority of  the constitution or law. 

Our unconstitutional supreme Court is acting like a black robed royal Supreme Court handing out judge-made-law without any CONSTITUTIONAL authority to do so!!!

We the People have no access to the justice[9] we sought to establish with our Constitution. 

Judge-made-law instigated the Civil War, maintained Jim Crow to this day

 

RIGHT Potential POSTS REV working

 

"Fake News Donny"

 

Sunday, January 25, 2026 - 2:26:34 PM

 

The Constitution for the United States - Article I, II, and  Schoolhouse Rock's[10] "I'm Just a Bill[11]" clearly define how to make law.  Show me where in the amended Constitution for the United States "judge-made-law" is called for or authorized[12]?

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view

The Issue with Trump, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html

American Exceptionalism – NOT SO MUCH

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html

A Balanced Budget for America

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html

BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president of...

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html

The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt "dark money" Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

The constitutional small "d" unrepresentative corrupt "dark money" Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

The Judicial sophistry of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law...  the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario. 

The Emperor Has No Clothes.

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html

DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

Sunday, January 25, 2026 - 2:26:34 PM

"Fake News Donny"


[1] Senator Angus King, quoting the Sheriff of Cumberland County Maine on Face the Nation 1/25/26 @40:43

[2] sub silentio is a Latin phrase that means "under silence" or "in silence". It's often used in legal contexts to describe something that's implied but not explicitly stated. For example, a court might overrule a case's holding sub silentio without explicitly stating that it's doing so.  Briscoe v. LaHue,  460 U. S. 362

[3] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)

[4] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976)

[5] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)

[6] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)

[7] Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997) Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367, 372, 372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138

[8] 23-939 Trump v. United States (07/01/2024)  There is not Statute of limitation on  Mureder or War Crimes – see the killings by bombings in the Caribbean "US strikes on alleged drug boats in Caribbean face mounting legal scrutiny "

[9] "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States"

--

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com  - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

 

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #512

St. Louis, MO 63103-2548

 
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, January 23, 2026

TISNC



 

Download as a 4 page PDF

 

"Fake News Donny"

Trump, "the Deplorable"

 

Friday, January 23, 2026 - 11:37:03 AM

 

Pat, I am OK.  You are OK.

 

Trump is the Symptom not the cause.

Thursday, January 22, 2026

 

Congressman Wesley Bell

1429 Longworth House Office Building

Washington, DC 20515

 

Senator Josh Hawley

381 Russell Senate Office Building

Washington, D.C. 20510

 

Senator Eric Schmitt

404 Russell Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510

 

Governor Mike Kehoe

P.O. Box 720,

Jefferson City, MO 65102

 

Re:  The issue today in the United States is NOT Donald Trump.

 

Dear People,

 

The whole idea of the judge-made-law of immunity from a constitution and the laws it creates is antithetical to the raison d'être for the very idea of a constitution and the rule of law.  The insanity is beyond belief.  I have been fighting this for 20+ years[1]!

The issue today in the United States is NOT Donald Trump.  Donald Trump is not SMART enough to be an issue.  The issue in the United States's representative-democracy today is judge-made-law.

Donald Trump got elected in 2016 with a bastardized supreme[2] Court pick in his pocket.  Then he luckily got to name two more supreme[3] Court picks. 

The issue of judge-made-law started with Alexander Hamilton, when he expressed a need in Federalist Papers 78-83 (1788).  Hamilton anonymously talked about a desire and a need for a learned Judiciary to review the constitutionality of laws.  But while it was probably discussed at the writing of the Constitution.  Neither judicial constitutional review or judge-made-law made it into the binding 4,000 words of the actual constitution written and signed a year prior to the Federalist Papers.  Federalist papers are NOT constitutionally binding.

Chief Justice John Marshall's (1755–1835) attempted, via "argumentative sleight of hand" to constitutionalize judge-made-law with Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803). But it was again NOT constitutionally binding. 

John Marshall asserted the right to judge-made-law but he rarely, if ever used it.  It was an abomination when Marshall's successor Chief Justice Roger B. Taney "supreme Court[4]" fired the first shot of the Civil War when his judge-made-law ruled Free States unconstitutional and that negroes "had no rights which the white man was bound to respect, and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit[5]" - Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856).   

It was a furtherance of the abomination when judge-made-law in 1887 over ruled Ida B. Wells's 1st and 7th Amendment award of $500 (~$17,498 in 2024).  It was a continuation of the that same abomination when the judge-made-law in Rosa Park's case fined her $10, plus $4 in court fees (equivalent to $164 in 2024) in 1955-1956 after appeal. 

Today the SAME abomination of judge-made-law still reigns supreme in the Jane Crow era with DGJeep v supreme Court of the United States,[6] DGJeep v Missouri Department of Social Services[7], and 23-939 Trump v. United States (07/01/2024).

This is ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of "We the People's" [8] intent to "establish justice." [9]

Abraham Lincoln, Barry Goldwater, and William F. Buckley are screaming from their graves at the horror of Trumpism and M.A.G.A. feigning to be their Republican Party.

The supreme Court's[10] sophistry[11] tells us, "We the People" sub silentio[12] traded the "King can do no WRONG" for the ABSOLUTELY IMMUNE actions of the "malicious or corrupt" judges,[13] the "malicious or dishonest" prosecutor[14], the "knowingly false testimony by police officers"[15], the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant, conscientiously stupid actions of "all persons (spouses) -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process,"[16] the actions of federal, state, local, and regional legislators[17] and now PRESIDENTS[18] acting under color of law to render absolute corruption of inalienable constitutional rights. 

The "supreme Court[19]" handed Trump his 2024 victory.

This is ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of "We the People's" [20] intent to "establish justice." [21]

The whole idea of the judge-made-law of immunity from a constitution and the laws it creates is antithetical to the raison d'être for the very idea of a constitution and the rule of law.  Article III has usurped power never conceived of by the Founding Fathers. 

Sir William.  Blackstone's "Commentaries on the Laws of England" published[22] prior to and was the basis for Article III, it "is not possible to lay down, with mathematical precision, any rule in regard to the authority of precedents.  Every judge and every court must consider that their function is jus aïcere and not jus dare.[23] "

Thomas Jefferson summed it up repeatedly and effectively in 1820:

"(Y)you seem to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so.  They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps.... Their power [is] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots…."

"I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society, but the people themselves (think "Voting," "due process of law" & "juries"): and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their controul with a wholsome discretion, the remedy is, not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. this is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power." (Thomas Jefferson 9/28/1820, in writing to Mr. JARVIS, from Monticello – bolding, underlining, and parentheticals added)

"For the first nearly 100 years, the last clause of the First Amendment held, that preceded Randall and Bradley (1776-1868).  There was neither need nor questions regarding Judicial Immunity and then TWO despotic precedents within 3 years:

Ø Randall v. Brigham, 74 U. S. 536 (decided April 15, 1869) sophistry in response to the criminal liability in The Civil Rights Act of 1866 passed in to law April 9, 1866 and then..

Ø Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (decided April 8, 1872)  sophistry in response to civil liability in the Civil Rights Act of 1871 passed into law April 20, 1871 are the origins of unconstitutional "immunity" in the American Justice system.

If there is anything further, please let me know.

"Time is of the essence"

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

 

cc: Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.

    www.DGJeep.com

    file

 

2026 01-23-26 Trump is the Symptom not the cause  POSTS REV working.docx

 

"Fake News Donny"

 

Friday, January 23, 2026 - 11:37:03 AM

 

The Constitution for the United States - Article I, II, and  Schoolhouse Rock's[24] "I'm Just a Bill[25]" clearly define how to make law.  Show me where in the amended Constitution for the United States "judge-made-law" is called for or authorized[26]?

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view

The Issue with Trump, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html

American Exceptionalism – NOT SO MUCH

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html

A Balanced Budget for America

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html

BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president of...

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html

The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt "dark money" Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

The constitutional small "d" unrepresentative corrupt "dark money" Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

The Judicial sophistry of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law...  the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario. 

The Emperor Has No Clothes.

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html

DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

Friday, January 23, 2026 - 11:37:03 AM

 

"Fake News Donny"

 


[1] DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

[2] Article III of the US Constitution posits a "supreme Court" among the many courts NOT a Supreme Court outside of the many.  Any and ALL Article III Judicial power REQUIRES the assent of an instant local jury.

[3] Article III of the US Constitution posits a "supreme Court" among the many courts NOT a Supreme Court outside of the many.  Any and ALL Article III Judicial power REQUIRES the assent of an instant local jury.

[4] Article III of the US Constitution posits a "supreme Court" among the many courts NOT a Supreme Court outside of the many.  Any and ALL Article III Judicial power REQUIRES the assent of an instant local jury.

[6] Writ of Certioraris to the supreme Court of the United States and associated District and Circuit petitions… 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856.

[7] APPEAL No.: 4925-SLMB-T-FY24STL -- DAVID JEEP, Petitioner, V. STATE OF MISSOURI, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondent -- Case No. 2422-CC11396

[8] Preamble to the Constitution for the United States

[9] Preamble to the Constitution for the United States

[10] Article III of the US Constitution posits a "supreme Court" among the many courts NOT a Supreme Court outside of the many.  ALL Article III Judicial power REQUIRES the assent of an instant local jury.

[11] Sophistry(?) is a logical fallacy that involves the use of deceptive, superficial arguments.

[12] sub silentio is a Latin phrase that means "under silence" or "in silence". It's often used in legal contexts to describe something that's implied but not explicitly stated. For example, a court might overrule a case's holding sub silentio without explicitly stating that it's doing so.  Briscoe v. LaHue,  460 U. S. 362

[13] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)

[14] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976)

[15] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)

[16] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)

[17] Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997) Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367, 372, 372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138

[19] Article III of the US Constitution posits a "supreme Court" among the many courts NOT a Supreme Court outside of the many.  Any and ALL Article III Judicial power REQUIRES the assent of an instant local jury.

[20] Preamble to the Constitution for the United States

[21] Preamble to the Constitution for the United States

[22] Blackstone's treatise was republished in 1770, 1773, 1774, 1775, 1778 and in a posthumous edition in 1783

[23] "This phrase translates to: "To declare the law, not to make or give the law". " Sir William Blackstone. Blackstone 1387-01 (Kindle Locations 23832-23834). Kindle Edition.   Blackstone's treatise was republished in 1770, 1773, 1774, 1775, 1778 and in a posthumous edition in 1783.





--

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com  - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

 

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #512

St. Louis, MO 63103-2548

 
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)