Justices of the Supreme Court
Antonin
Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen
Breyer, John G. Roberts, Samuel Alito, and Sonia Sotomayor
c/o Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543-0001
Re: Judicial and Justice Department Liability
“4-Year-Old Can Be Sued, But a Judge Can’t Be”
Dear Justices,
We all know that “This
Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in
Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under
the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the
Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in
the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.[1]”
We all know that the 14th Amendment states that “All
persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State
wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law
which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty,
or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
Even if common law did supercede, Blackstone’s “The Commentaries on the 18th-century common law of England” 1769 as quoted in Marbury v. Madison, 5 U. S. 137 (1803) “it
is a settled and invariable principle in the laws of England that every
right, when withheld, must have a remedy, and every injury its proper
redress." supercedes Floyd and Barker. (1607)
Easter Term, 5 James, I In the Court of Star Chamber. So where do you
get off awarding ABSOLUTE immunity like “Halloween Candy” to everyone at
the expense of the rights of “We the People’s” for redress as assured
by the 1st Amendment, “Congress shall make no law… abridging…
the right of the people... to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.”
I, again, beg of you, I am a person;
I am a father that has had his rights stolen by a negligent,
incompetent, corrupt and malicious system. I thought I had rights. I
need your help. I have NOTHING left. Please give the “Jane Crow” era,
Jeep v. United States of America[2] your consideration.
If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
“Time is of the essence”
Thank you in advance.
Dave@DGJeep.com
David G. Jeep
cc: file
But a Judge Can’t Be”
“A 4-Year-Old Can Be Sued, Judge Rules in Bike Case.” “Citing cases dating back as far as 1928, a New York State Supreme Court Justice[3]
has ruled that a young girl accused of running down an elderly woman
while racing a bicycle with training wheels on a Manhattan sidewalk two
years ago can be sued for negligence.[4]”
But a Judge cannot be sued for negligence, or corruption, or malice. Does anybody see an issue here????? The Judiciary has, without the consent of “We the People,” awarded itself, the Justice Department[5], the Judges[6], the Prosecutors[7] and the Police[8]
absolute immunity from liability for the deprivation of OUR rights,
privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws.
This is INSANITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Supreme Court, the Justice department, the Judges and the police per “We the People” in our constitutional law[9], common law[10], criminal statutory law[11] and civil statutory law[12]
are liable for the criminal deprivation of any rights, privileges, or
immunities secured by the Constitution and laws. But the Supreme Court,
via their own JUDGE MADE LAW, has awarded themselves
absolute immunity from our democratically constitutionally obligatory
Rule of Law. And NOW they want to say that a “4-Year-Old Can Be Sued, Judge Rules in Bike Case”
Immunity by DEFINITION is diametrically opposed to the Rule of Law.
Immunity puts someone outside the reach of the obligatory Rule of Law.
Our Justice system is by definition based on the democratic,
constitutional, equal protection obligatory Rule of Law not the rule of
an oligarchy or single man. Our Justice System is authorized and
defined by our Constitution to enforce the Rule of Law per our rights,
privileges or immunities as secured by the Constitution and Laws of the
United States of America.
BUT, Per JUDGE MADE LAW
an elected or a confirmed or an appointed Judiciary Officer, with
possibly a lifetime appointment, can not be held accountable and SUED
for his negligence, or his corruption, or his malicious actions under
Color of Law but a “4-Year-Old Can Be”?????
Something is VERY wrong here!!!!!!
This is insanity!!!!!!
Just be thankful you have not been randomly selected for their illegal, unconstitutional treatment via IMMUNITY. Please give the “Jane Crow” era, Jeep v. United States of America[13] your consideration. If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
[2]
A Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, Jeep v United States of America
“Opposed to Immunity” currently on file in the Supreme Court clerk’s
office, 8th District Court of appeals Appeal: 10-1947, U.S.
Federal Court Eastern District of Missouri Case No. Case 4:10-CV-101-TCM
-- State Court Case No.: 03FC-10670M, Missouri Court of Appeals eastern
District ED84021, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Missouri Jeep
v. Jones et al, 4:07-cv-01116-CEJ, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
07-2614, Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115 &
State Court Case # CR203-1336M, Missouri Court of Appeals Southern
District SD26269, U.S. District Court Western District of Missouri
07-0506-CV-W-SOW Jeep v Bennett, et al, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of
Appeals 08-1823 (http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/).
[3] Justice Paul Wooten of the New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan
[4]
New York Times, New York edition, Published: October 28, 2010, A
version of this article appeared in print on October 29, 2010, on page
A24 By ALAN FEUER,
[5] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) @ Page 460 U.S. 335
“In short, the common law provided absolute immunity from subsequent
damages liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who
were integral parts of the judicial process.” It should be noted that
the common law referenced here is Floyd and Barker. (1607) Easter Term, 5
James I In the Court of Star Chamber. This was superceded 160 years later by the codification of Common Law by Blackstone in “The Commentaries on the 18th-century common law of England” 1765-1769 and the Supremacy clause Article VI § 2 of the Constitution for the United States of America.
“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be
made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be
made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law
of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any
Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary
notwithstanding.”
[6] Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967) Judges have ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
[7] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976)
We hold only that, in initiating a prosecution and in presenting the
State's case, the prosecutor is immune from a civil suit for damages
under § 1983. A prosecutor can knowingly prosecute a false charge,
present false evidence and the victim has no recourse.
[8] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) Held:
Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1976 ed., Supp. V) does not authorize a
convicted state defendant to assert a claim for damages against a police
officer for giving perjured testimony at the defendant's criminal
trial. Pp. 460 U. S. 329-346. A police officer can perjure himself to convict and the victim has no recourse for damages.
[9] Right of redress as assured by the 1st
Amendment Congress shall make no law… abridging… the right of the
people…to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
[10]
See The Commentaries on the 18th-century common law of England (and
thus America) by Sir William Blackstone, originally published by the
Clarendon Press at Oxford, 1765-1769. Specifically Sir William
Blackstone (1723 –1780) as quoted in Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 1 Cranch 137 (1803) @ Page 5 U. S. 163
“Blackstone states… it is a general and indisputable rule that where
there is a legal right, there is also a legal remedy by suit or action
at law whenever that right is invaded.”
[13]
A Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, Jeep v United States of America
“Opposed to Immunity” currently on file in the Supreme Court clerk’s
office, 8th District Court of appeals Appeal: 10-1947, U.S.
Federal Court Eastern District of Missouri Case No. Case 4:10-CV-101-TCM
-- State Court Case No.: 03FC-10670M, Missouri Court of Appeals eastern
District ED84021, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Missouri Jeep
v. Jones et al, 4:07-cv-01116-CEJ, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
07-2614, Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115 &
State Court Case # CR203-1336M, Missouri Court of Appeals Southern
District SD26269, U.S. District Court Western District of Missouri
07-0506-CV-W-SOW Jeep v Bennett, et al, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of
Appeals 08-1823 (http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/).
