Robert O'Connor (by hand delivery)
Criminal Investigator U.S. Marshal Service
U. S. Department of Justice
111 South 10th Street, Suite 2-319
St. Louis, MO 63102
Phone 314-539-2023
E-Mail: Robert.OConnor@USDOJ.gov
Re: The “Jane Crow” era, Jeep v. United States of America[1]
Dear Mr. O’Connor,
I am back, same problem, same issue, new catch phrase / sound bite. As I said before, I ain’t giving up. I got nothing but fight left, the government of the United States of America has taken EVERYTHING from me without the substantive and procedural protection for rights, Due Process of Law. They have, by disregarding my rights, my appeals, my petitions and my efforts, denied me my First Amendment Right to a Redress of Grievances[2]. This time we are going to do it more sensibly, more organized if you will. I want my day in court! In this instance, you are the one that gets left holding the bag: for someone else’s negligence, incompetence, malice and corruption, sorry about that.
This is about the insidious malice and corruption in our court/justice/judicial system. It is still the same as during the “Jim Crow” era (Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)). When the emancipated persons could not get equal protection[3] of their First Amendment Right to a Redress of Grievances from the then and STILL corrupt courts. I refuse to believe that Thurgood Marshall was the first one to think of suing to redress the grievance for failure to provide the “equal” in “separate but equal.” I site Ida B. Wells’ refusal to give up her seat on May 4, 1884, a Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad Company conductor and two other men dragged Wells out of the car. She sued and won her case on December 24, 1884 when the local circuit court granted her a $500 settlement. The railroad company appealed to the Tennessee Supreme Court, which reversed the lower court's ruling in 1885, concluding that, "We think it is evident that the purpose of the defendant in error was to harass with a view to this suit, and that her persistence was not in good faith to obtain a comfortable seat for the short ride." Wells was ordered to pay court costs.” In 1885 Ida B. Wells was forced to the back of the train and she had to pay the corrupt court costs for the privilege. Rosa Parks in 1955 was just the first one to garner mass support and not be forced to pay corrupt court cost.
Now we are in the “Jane Crow” [4] era when men cannot get access to the corrupt court to redress their grievances regarding equal protection of Due Process of the laws, discrimination with orders of protection and in divorce. I will have been at this seven years on November 3, 2010. I have given the Supreme Court a date of November 4, 2010. If I do not receive anything as regards a settlement by then, we are still at war[5]. They leave me no choice but SELF DEFENSE in the face of their illegal, unconstitutional incompetent, malicious and corrupt actions. I restate my position[6]:
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one person to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
I hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train[7] of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of this Person; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present Black Robed Royal Judiciary is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny[8] over the Citizens of the United States of America. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world:
I submit A Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, Jeep v United States of America “Opposed to Immunity” currently on file in the Supreme Court clerk’s office, 8th District Court of appeals Appeal: 10-1947, U.S. Federal Court Eastern District of Missouri Case No. 4:10-CV-101-TCM -- State Court Case No.: 03FC-10670M, Missouri Court of Appeals eastern District ED84021, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Missouri Jeep v. Jones et al, 4:07-cv-01116-CEJ, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 07-2614, Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115 & State Court Case # CR203-1336M, Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District SD26269, U.S. District Court Western District of Missouri 07-0506-CV-W-SOW Jeep v Bennett, et al, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 08-1823 (http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/) as ADDITONAL FACTS. We are all EQUAL.
We are all entitled to equal protection[9] of substantive and procedural Due Process of the Law[10]. NO ONE, least of all Judges, has immunity from Due Process of the Law.
As I referenced previously with my appeals, my petition for a writ of certiorari and in my prior correspondents with you and because I know you never took the time to look at them, I NOW include for the record:
1. A copy of the trial transcript (SD26269.doc), where Officer Little gave false testimony
2. A copy of the “U.S. Department of Transportation DWI Detection and Standardized Field Sobriety Testing Participant Manual” 2002 Edition (NHSTA) Page VIII-11, Section 4. Test Conditions, Second Paragraph, last sentence that proves his testimony to be false. Note I asked specifically for this information in pretrial motions[11].
3. A copy of the trial transcript (SD26269.doc) where Officer Taylor contradicts his prior sworn police report. He testified I did not blow for a continuous 15 seconds.
4. A copy of Officer Taylor’s sworn police report[12] dated 05-18-03. Taylor confirmed on page two of his sworn report, I blew for 15 seconds without stopping, “Jeep started again watching his watch and stopped after blowing approximately 15 seconds.” No one can blow for 20 seconds without stopping. If it is attempted on the DATAMASTER as programmed for the State of Missouri (5/17/03) it will ALWAYS return an “Invalid result” every-time. There is NO way, given the instructions in Taylor’s sworn police report, anyone could pass the test. Anyone following those instructions will fail with an “Invalid result” every-time. The police report is consistent with verifiable facts, i.e., the “invalid result”. Taylor’s sworn trial testimony is not is consistent with verifiable facts; it will not produce an “invalid result”. He thus gave false testimony.
5. A copy of the petition for an order of protection filed 11/03/03. It does not list any “probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation[13]” i.e., “first hand abuse”. What it lists is an inadmissible hear-say allegation of a bad-act regarding a court appearance from a month prior and 150 miles away, where the alleged victim, by her own admission, was NOT EVEN PRESENT and where the judge eventually, all though unknown at the time of the hearing (11/19/03), would recuse himself[14] for his thus admitted bad act.
This was trial by ambush, there was no probable cause, and there was no presentment of the charges. The malicious and corrupt Judges, Goeke and Jones, just made it up as they went along,[15] without regard to my Constitutional VI and V Amendment rights.
Nearly seven years after the hearing I still do not know specifically what I was charged with. I was never provided the presentment of the charges, even after the malicious and corrupt finding. My attorney, Mr. Schlesinger, at the time filed two timely motions for that information subsequent to the illegal, unconstitutional, malicious and corrupt judicial finding. Both motions were ignored. It boggles the mind, where is the substantive and procedural protection, Due Process of Law????? I quote from the trial transcript (ED84021.doc):
“MR. SCHLESINGER: I renew my objection to all the testimony about physical abuse, physical harm, and threatened harm, based on it being (infamous and) outside the scope of the pleadings (i.e., presentment of charges[16]).
COMMISSIONER JONES: Overruled.
The Court finds--First of all, the Court amends the pleadings to conform with the evidence adduced. The Court does find the allegations of the amended petition to be true. The Court does enter a full order of protection against the Respondent. This order will supercede the ex parte order of protection entered in this cause on the 3rd day of November and serves to terminate that order.
The Respondent should not use, attempt to use, or threaten to use physical force against the Petitioner that would be reasonably expected to cause her bodily harm, should not stalk, abuse, threaten to abuse, molest, or disturb her peace wherever she may be found. He also shall not communicate with her in any manner or through any means.
And he is also further restrained from the residence at 16325 Centerpointe Drive in Wildwood, Missouri 63040.
This order will expire the 19th day of November, the year 2004.”
I lost my son, my home everything I cared about. My son, my home everything I cared about was put under the authority of my NEW found worst enemy, Sharon G. Jeep, my now ex-wife. That was THE most difficult year of my life. While handicapped by an unconstitutional, illegal, unfounded court order I was dragged through a divorce. That produced a biased, unconstitutional, illegal, and unfounded Divorce Decree that attempted to permanently institute the fraud, corruption and malice into a Court Ordered Property Settlement and Custody Order that I have been appealing for nearly 7 years, since it’s issue.[17]
That was trial by ambush, via a FRAUDULENT INFAMOUS[18] charge, with the aid and oversight of a judicial officer. That was a court-assisted CRIME[19], NOT substantive and procedural due process of law. The Amendment V “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment” was specifically included into the Bill of Rights to preclude this.
I paraphrase here, but I think it is germane: “It is fair to say that the average jury (or the public at large), in a greater or less degree, has confidence that these (constitutional) obligations (to tell the truth), which so plainly rest upon the (Judges, witnesses, Police and) prosecuting attorney, will be faithfully observed. Consequently, improper suggestions, insinuations, (unconstitutional actions) and, especially, assertions of personal knowledge are apt to carry much weight against the accused, when they should properly carry none.” (Non-italic, parenthetical text added for clarity) Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78 (1935) Page 295 U. S. 88.
A slim, I know, chance at Justice is all I have LEFT. I literally have nothing left to loose.
My ex-wife, two police officers and three prosecuting attorneys are clearly guilty of presenting fraudulent evidence; there can be no question of that. Numerous Judges[20] along the way have been made aware of this fact and have not done their job, equal protection of the laws,[21] i.e., Justice “under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties.”[22] BUT, the Supreme Court says everyone[23] is immune from being accountable for OUR Civil Rights. I have no RIGHTS at all!! YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS!! They can say anything they want to take away your son, your home, everything in life you care about… convict you, the probable cause does not even have to pertain to the charge.
This is old news. I realize you are personally aware of this, but again for the record “The Booming Domestic Violence Industry”:
“It doesn't take a cynic to point out that when a woman is getting a divorce, what she may truly fear is not violence, but losing the house or kids. Under an Order of Protection (209A[24]), if she's willing to fib to the judge and say she is "in fear" of her children's father, she will get custody and money and probably the house…
Long-term emotional damage to children's fathers -- surely not good for children -- often begins with a restraining order…
"A man against whom a frivolous Order of Protection (209A) has been brought starts to lose any power in his divorce proceeding. They do start decompensating[25], and they do start to have emotional issues, and they do start developing post-traumatic stress disorders. They keep replaying in their minds the tape of what happened to them in court. It starts this whole vicious downward cycle. They've been embarrassed and shamed in front of their family and friends, unjustly, and they totally lose any sense of self-control and self-respect... It's difficult for the court to see where that person was prior to the restraining order."” [26]
I will be walking into the Federal Court house unarmed and attacking with my bare hands. Now it is not my wish or intention to do anyone any harm. If you are open to a negotiation to limit this to the use of symbolic force, I am open to suggestions. This letter may be enough in and of itself to get me arrested in today’s exaggeratedly sensitive world. I fully expect to be arrested[27]. I have nowhere to go, no home, no career, no possessions, no family to go home to. I have but the will that says hold on and the intent to fight for my inviolable rights even though I carry no weapons.
As a side bar, for the record, as you know we have been before. Additionally apart from the current issue, I was on a plane on 9/11/01 about to land at BWI, 30 miles away from and 30 minutes after the terrorist hit the pentagon. I flew again two days later, 9/13/01, to BWI. I flew again on two days later, 9/15/01, back to Saint Louis. I flew at least twice a week, every week for the next four months. I refuse to be afraid. You give into fear and the despots and fear-mongers win. I refuse to be afraid.
I refuse to live in fear. THIS IS SELF-DEFENSE. I may be thrown in jail but I will be yelling with all my strength from my jail cell and with self-defense as my legal-defense from the courtroom, Our Justice System is “The Most Corrupt Organization in the World. [28]” “We have no rights in America today.[29]” “We live in a Lawless Society.[30]” “When did we authorize our Judges to become tyrants?[31]” “Immunity is DIAMETRICALLY opposed to the Rule of Law.[32]”
“We are there Absolute Corruption[33]!!!!!!!!!!!” “Absolute Immunity” enables “Absolute Power,” that leads to “Absolute Corruption”. It is every person for themselves. We have no Justice; we have no union; we have no commonality. That brings us to “A petition for a Writ of Certiorari Jeep v United States of America.[34]”
The Supreme Court as the Grantor is attempting to cover up their undeniable human fallibility via fiat by awarding themselves as the Grantee “absolute immunity.” They have forgotten their purpose as the “Justice Department”. I quote from James Madison in the Federalist papers to remind them and you: “Justice is the end of government. It is the end of civil society. It ever has been and ever will be pursued until it be obtained, or until liberty be lost in the pursuit.[35]” When they can take away everything you ever cared about with a surprise infamous charge over timely objections and appeals to redress, appeals to sanity, appeals to lex terra[36] get no response. We are left at the entrance to the primordial cave fighting hand and fist for dominance. “The very essence of civil liberty certainly consists in the right of every individual to claim the protection of the laws, whenever he receives an injury. One of the first duties of governments are to afford that protection.” [37] Society descends into anarchy when the Protection of the Laws, the essence of civil liberty is denied.
If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
“Time is of the essence”
Dave@DGJeep.com
David G. Jeep
cc: Chief Justice John Glover Roberts, Jr. (1st class U.S. Mail)
President Barack Hussein Obama, “I've had it up to here”[38] (1st class U.S. Mail)
Richard G. Callahan, U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Missouri (by hand delivery)
Adam Liptak, New York Times Washington, D.C. (1st class U.S. Mail)
e-mailed to a select group of favorites
file
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS SOUTHERN DISTRICT
STATE OF MISSOURI, )
Respondent, )
v. ) S. D. No. 26269
DAVID G. JEEP, )
Appellant. )
IN THE CAMDEN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
TWENTY-SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, ASSOCIATE DIVISION
The Honorable Bruce Colyer, Judge
STATE OF MISSOURI, )
Plaintiff, )
v. ) Cause No. CR203-1336M
DAVID G. JEEP, )
Defendant. )
TRANSCRIPT ON APPEAL
ALEX LITTLE, called as a witness in behalf of the STATE, being duly sworn, testified as follows:
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. JEEP: Excerpt starting page 84
Q. The walk-and-turn and the balance test, the standards for applying that test, do they reference anything about footwear?
A. Yes. They say that if a person has on footwear that has like greater than four-inch heels, then you can allow them to take their footwear off, if they want to, to perform the test.
Q. Is it a four-inch heel?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Or a two-inch heel?
A. It's a--If I'm not mistaken, it's a four-inch heel.
Q. Do you have that in writing anywhere?
A. Not on me now, no.
MR. JEEP: Do you have that? I asked for this earlier, Judge. No one was able to present me with it or they told me to look for it, and I looked under the NHTSA, I called NHTSA, they wanted me to buy it from them--
THE COURT: Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. No.
MR. JEEP: Excuse me. They--The--
THE COURT: You asked the question, he's answered it.
MR. JEEP: Okay.
BY MR. JEEP:
Q. There's no place where this is standardized? Do you have in your--in writing anyplace?
A. I would assume I had it with the information that they gave me in the academy.
Q. Okay. And you think it's four-inch?
A. Yes, sir.
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS SOUTHERN DISTRICT
STATE OF MISSOURI, )
Respondent, )
v. ) S. D. No. 26269
DAVID G. JEEP, )
Appellant. )
IN THE CAMDEN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
TWENTY-SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, ASSOCIATE DIVISION
The Honorable Bruce Colyer, Judge
STATE OF MISSOURI, )
Plaintiff, )
v. ) Cause No. CR203-1336M
DAVID G. JEEP, )
Defendant. )
TRANSCRIPT ON APPEAL
TIM TAYLOR, called as a witness in behalf of the STATE, being duly sworn, testified as follows:
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. JEEP: Excerpt starting page 118
Q. I mean that's what you said. I blew for 15 seconds. How did you know I was blowing 15 seconds?
A. Approximately 15 seconds.
Q. Approximately 15 seconds. Okay.
A. Uh-huh.
Q. So I did have a solid tone for approximately 15 seconds?
A. No. Actually your take (phonetic spelling) cut out during the 15 seconds.
Q. The tape (phonetic spelling) cut out?
A. Your breath sample.
Q. So it wasn't 15 seconds; how long was it approximately?
A. You blew approximately for 15 seconds.
Q. Okay. So I blew for approximately 15 seconds at a solid tone?
A. No. There was--There was a break in--
Q. How long of a solid tone did I blow for approximately?
A. I really don't recall.
Q. Was there a break in the 15 seconds? Did I stop and start in the 15 seconds?
A. Yes.
Q. That's not what your--I mean you stated here in your supplement report here--have you read it right here, this last sentence, "Jeep started the test, watching his watch. After blowing for approximately 15 seconds"--
A. Uh-huh.
Q. So I blew 15 seconds, but it wasn't a blow; it was a--
A. I don't think I stated that it was a continuous blow for 15 seconds, no.
Q. Okay. So it was just a blow, I guess. I don't know--We don't know what it was. Start and stopped. Okay.
And you also said that I blew earlier on in his--in one of these instances, huffing and puffing for five seconds approximately each time?
A. I don't know--
Q. Earlier testimony.
A. --know what you mean by huffing and puffing.
Q. Well, I mean you said I blew, starting and stopping approximately five--five seconds each time.
A. Approximately five seconds. About the longest
that you would blow was approximately five seconds, yes.
  |
Thursday, October 21, 2010
President Barack Hussein Obama
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest
Washington, DC 20500-0001
Re: The “Jane Crow” era, Jeep v. United States of America[39]
A letter to Robert O'Connor, U.S. Marshal Service dated October 21, 2010
Dear Barack,
Not sure how or if you want to deal with this. I am as you can see also in contact with your appointee Richard G. Callahan, U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Missouri.
Please give the enclosed your consideration along with my submission Jeep v. United States of America[40], a petition for a writ of certiorari. As you can see, from the enclosed letter, it is an on going issue.
If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
“Time is of the essence”
Dave@DGJeep.com
David G. Jeep
cc: file
enclosure
Thursday, October 21, 2010
Chief Justice John Glover Roberts, Jr.
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543-0001
Re: The “Jane Crow” era, Jeep v. United States of America[41]
A letter to Robert O'Connor, U.S. Marshal Service dated October 21, 2010
Dear Mr. Roberts,
Please give the enclosed your consideration along with my prior submission Jeep v. United States of America, a petition for a writ of certiorari. As you can see, from the enclosed letter, it is an on going issue.
If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
“Time is of the essence”
Dave@DGJeep.com
David G. Jeep
cc: file
enclosure
Thursday, October 21, 2010
Richard G. Callahan
U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Missouri United States Attorney
Thomas Eagleton U.S. Courthouse
111 S. 10th Street, 20th Floor
St. Louis, MO 63102-1125
Telephone: 314.539.2200
Fax: 314.539.2309
TDD: 314.539.7690
Re: The “Jane Crow” era, Jeep v. United States of America[42]
A letter to Robert O'Connor, U.S. Marshal Service dated October 21, 2010
Dear Mr. Callahan,
You are somewhat of a late invitee to this issue, for that I apologize. The Office you now head is not. I have had several contacts with your office. I note the approximate dates of prior communications 10-20-06, 08-11-08 and my arrest in March of 2009 (Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP). You should have paperwork on it all. As you can see, from the enclosed letter, it is an on going issue.
If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
“Time is of the essence”
Dave@DGJeep.com
David G. Jeep
cc: file
enclosure
Thursday, October 21, 2010
Adam Liptak
The New York Times
1627 I St NW, Ste 700
Washington, DC 20006-4007
(202) 862-0300
Re: The “Jane Crow” era, Jeep v. United States of America[43]
A letter to Robert O'Connor, U.S. Marshal Service dated October 21, 2010
Dear Mr. Liptak,
You are somewhat of a late invitee to this issue, for that I apologize. As you can see, from the enclosed letter, it is an on going issue.
If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
“Time is of the essence”
Dave@DGJeep.com
David G. Jeep
cc: file
enclosure
[1] A Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, Jeep v United States of America “Opposed to Immunity” currently on file in the Supreme Court clerk’s office, 8th District Court of appeals Appeal: 10-1947, U.S. Federal Court Eastern District of Missouri Case No. Case 4:10-CV-101-TCM -- State Court Case No.: 03FC-10670M, Missouri Court of Appeals eastern District ED84021, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Missouri Jeep v. Jones et al, 4:07-cv-01116-CEJ, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 07-2614, Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115 & State Court Case # CR203-1336M, Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District SD26269, U.S. District Court Western District of Missouri 07-0506-CV-W-SOW Jeep v Bennett, et al, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 08-1823 (http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/).
[2] “Congress shall make no law respecting… the right of the people… to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Based on The Text of Magna Carta § 61 (1215) “If we, our chief justice (judges), our officials, or any of our servants offend in any respect against any man, or transgress any of the articles of the peace or of this security… they shall come to us - or in our absence from the kingdom to the chief justice - to declare it and claim immediate redress… by seizing our castles, lands, possessions, or anything else saving only our own person and those of the queen and our children, until they have secured such redress as they have determined upon.”
[3] Amendment XIV § 1 “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”, Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.
[4] “The Booming Domestic Violence Industry” - Massachusetts News, 08/02/99, By John Maguire, Hitting below the belt Monday, 10/25/99 12:00 ET, By Cathy Young, Salon - Divorced men claim discrimination by state courts, 09/07/99, By Erica Noonan, Associated Press, Dads to Sue for Discrimination, 08/24/99, By Amy Sinatra, ABCNEWS.com, The Federal Scheme to Destroy Father-Child Relationships, by Jake Morphonios, 02/13/08
[5] See A Declaration of Independence…. War (http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2008/10/declaration-of-independence-war.html) dated Monday, October 6, 2008, of course you have seen it before
[6] Again, as excerpted from The Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776.
[7] This has been a long train of abuses and usurpations, under color of law since 11-03-03, nearly 7 years.
[8] Absolute Immunity = Absolute Power Absolute Corruption Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. (13 Wall) 335 (1871[8]) Judge’s immunity, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967) Judge’s absolute immunity, Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976) Prosecutor’s absolute immunity, Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978) Judge’s absolute power and Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) Police and witness absolute immunity PERJURY, Absolute Corruption.
[9] Amendment XIV § 1, ibid.
[11] “Suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused who has requested it violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution.” Pp.8 866-88. BRADY V. MARYLAND, 373 U. S. 83 (1963)
[12] Re-enact the events as described by Taylor’s police report. First see if you can find ANYONE that can sustain a blow for 20 seconds without stopping, as I was told I had to do. It is humanly impossible. And secondly tell me what kind of report you get from the DATAMASTER as programmed for the State of Missouri (5/17/03) after maintaining a steady tone for as long as humanly possible. Lets say 15 seconds (+/-) as I did. It will be an “invalid” result. The police report dated 5-18-03 is accurate and verifiable; his trial testimony is false. Anybody that is given the instructions, I was given as documented in Taylor’s police report WILL FAIL THE TEST and thus be marked as a REFUSAL, loose their license for two years and be dammed in any pending divorce and or criminal trial. The police in Osage Beach, The State of Missouri Department of Revenue, that has the authority and responsibility to reviews these suspensions, neither of them know what a refusal is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I told them that during the appeal. If the State of Missouri had even a clue as to what constituted a refusal this should be a Brady Violation also, BRADY V. MARYLAND, 373 U. S. 83 (1963)
[13] The Bill of Rights: Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine. Amendment IV – “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”, ratified 12/15/1791.
[14] Judge Bennett recused himself; I had filed a grievance with the Commission on Retirement, Removal and Discipline of Judges. Not that it did any good; the Commission has no authority to do anything to a sitting Judge. They are window dressing, used to wear a person down into submission.
[15] “This (absolute impunity) immunity applies even when the judge is accused of acting maliciously and corruptly” (Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 13 Wall. 335 (1871) @ page 349), (Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967) @ page 554) and (Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12 (1991))… Therefore a malicious and corrupt “judge of a criminal (any) court, invested with general criminal jurisdiction over offenses committed within a certain district, should hold a particular act to be a public offense, which is not by the law made an offense[15], and proceed to the arrest and trial of a party charged with such act, or should sentence a party convicted to a greater punishment than that authorized by the law[15] upon its proper construction, no personal liability[15] to civil action for such acts would attach to the judge” Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 13 Wall. 335 335 (1871) Page 80 U. S. 352 and “There is no safety for the citizen except in the protection of the (malicious and corrupt) judicial tribunals for rights which have been invaded by the officers of the government professing to act in its name. There remains to him but the alternative of resistance, which may amount to crime.” (Non-italic, parenthetical and lined through editing added for clarity)(United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196 (1882) , Page 106 U. S. 219) (Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents (1971) @ 403 US 394-395).
[16] Non-italic parenthetical text added for clarity as regards the Amendment V “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment.”
[17] The supposed victim, Sharon G. Jeep, testified on the stand under oath AFTER the Ex-Parte Order, AFTER the Divorce Decree that she had never had any issue with my drinking, I was never a drunk in her presence or my son’s. That I never hit her that I never threatened to hit her. That makes her original assertion 11/03/03 theft via fraud. It is all part of the extended court record. I enjoy a drink usually a beer every once and a while. I do not have a drinking or violence issues. I am usually a very easygoing guy, ask anybody, but the alleged victim. I was NOT DRUNK or even under the influence on the night in question in Osage Beach.
[18] Amendment V “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment.” Seven years later and I still have not gotten a presentment of what I was charged with???
[20] Goeke, Jones, Bennett, Coyler for starters. This does not even include the 21st District, appellate, federal or Supreme Court Judges all have been negligent in their responsibilities to the Constitution and the ends of Justice.
[21] AMENDMENT XIV § 1, Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.
[22] The Constitution for the United States of America Article III § 2 and Amendment IV, ratified December 15, 1791.
[23] Judges have Absolute Immunity = Absolute Power ---- Absolute Corruption Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. (13 Wall) 335 (1871) Judge’s immunity, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967) Judge’s absolute immunity from Civil Rights Violations, Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978) Judge’s absolute power to make law from the bench, A Judge can quite literally order anything from the bench irrespective of the Constitution, Bill of Rights, Civil Rights, or lex terra. We are there ---- Absolute Corruption. The victims have NO JUSTICE or RECOURSE. Prosecutors have absolute Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976) Prosecutor’s have absolute immunity from Civil Rights violation in the prosecution or presentation of evidence at trial. They can knowingly prosecute a false charge, present false evidence ---- Absolute Corruption. The victims have NO JUSTICE or RECOURSE. Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) Police and witness have absolute immunity for PERJURY as regards our civil rights. The victim of perjury, false accusations is convicted. ---- Absolute Corruption. The victims have NO JUSTICE or RECOURSE.
[24] (209A) This quote refers to the statute the result of 1978 Abuse Prevention Act in Massachusetts. Could be MO.
[25] (in psychology) the failure of a defense mechanism.
[26] Sheara F. Friend, as quoted in “The Booming Domestic Violence Industry” - Massachusetts News, 08/02/99, By John Maguire. That describes my first year under an order of protection perfectly!!!!!!!!!!!
[27] I will turn myself in if that would help? I am staying at 711 Allen same as last time, no need to come in tactical gear this time. I leave every morning between 5:45 AM and 6:15 AM.
[35] FEDERALIST No. 51, The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments For the Independent Journal. Wednesday, February 6, 1788, James Madison
[36] The Law of the Land
[38] A Joe Biden quote in a recent e-mail from the Obama Campaign / administration
[39] A Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, Jeep v United States of America “Opposed to Immunity” currently on file in the Supreme Court clerk’s office, 8th District Court of appeals Appeal: 10-1947, U.S. Federal Court Eastern District of Missouri Case No. Case 4:10-CV-101-TCM -- State Court Case No.: 03FC-10670M, Missouri Court of Appeals eastern District ED84021, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Missouri Jeep v. Jones et al, 4:07-cv-01116-CEJ, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 07-2614, Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115 & State Court Case # CR203-1336M, Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District SD26269, U.S. District Court Western District of Missouri 07-0506-CV-W-SOW Jeep v Bennett, et al, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 08-1823 (http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/).
[40] Your acting Solicitor General should have a copy
[41] A Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, Jeep v United States of America “Opposed to Immunity” currently on file in the Supreme Court clerk’s office, 8th District Court of appeals Appeal: 10-1947, U.S. Federal Court Eastern District of Missouri Case No. Case 4:10-CV-101-TCM -- State Court Case No.: 03FC-10670M, Missouri Court of Appeals eastern District ED84021, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Missouri Jeep v. Jones et al, 4:07-cv-01116-CEJ, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 07-2614, Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115 & State Court Case # CR203-1336M, Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District SD26269, U.S. District Court Western District of Missouri 07-0506-CV-W-SOW Jeep v Bennett, et al, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 08-1823 (http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/).
[42] A Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, Jeep v United States of America “Opposed to Immunity” currently on file in the Supreme Court clerk’s office, 8th District Court of appeals Appeal: 10-1947, U.S. Federal Court Eastern District of Missouri Case No. Case 4:10-CV-101-TCM -- State Court Case No.: 03FC-10670M, Missouri Court of Appeals eastern District ED84021, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Missouri Jeep v. Jones et al, 4:07-cv-01116-CEJ, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 07-2614, Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115 & State Court Case # CR203-1336M, Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District SD26269, U.S. District Court Western District of Missouri 07-0506-CV-W-SOW Jeep v Bennett, et al, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 08-1823 (http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/).
[43] A Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, Jeep v United States of America “Opposed to Immunity” currently on file in the Supreme Court clerk’s office, 8th District Court of appeals Appeal: 10-1947, U.S. Federal Court Eastern District of Missouri Case No. Case 4:10-CV-101-TCM -- State Court Case No.: 03FC-10670M, Missouri Court of Appeals eastern District ED84021, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Missouri Jeep v. Jones et al, 4:07-cv-01116-CEJ, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 07-2614, Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115 & State Court Case # CR203-1336M, Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District SD26269, U.S. District Court Western District of Missouri 07-0506-CV-W-SOW Jeep v Bennett, et al, 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 08-1823 (http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/).
From: David G. Jeep <dgjeep01@yahoo.com>
To: Robert O'Connor <Robert.OConnor@USDOJ.gov>
Cc: SAMUEL A. ALITO JR. <SALITO@SupremeCourt.gov>; Equal Justice America <info@equaljusticeamerica.org>; RUTH BADER GINSBURG <RBADERGINSBURG@SupremeCourt.gov>; Charles M Blow <chblow@nytimes.com>; Jess Bravin <jess.bravin@wsj.com>; STEPHEN G. BREYER <SBREYER@SupremeCourt.gov>; JUDGE BUSTERS <alberta1-judgebusters@hotmail.com>; U.S. Commission on Civil Rights COMPLAINT REFERRAL SERVICE <referrals@usccr.gov>; Gloria C. Cox <gcox@unt.edu>; "David Jeep Dave@dgjeep" <Dave@DGJeep.com>; SANDRA DAY O’CONNOR <SDAYOCONNOR@SupremeCourt.gov>; Micheal Dwyer <Michael_Dwyer@FD.org>; Michael Gans <Michael_Gans@ca8.uscourts.gov>; Paul Hammel <paul.hammel@owh.com>; Equal Justice Initiative <contact_us@eji.org>; David G. Jeep <DGJeep01@Yahoo.com>; David G. Jeep <DGJeep@DGJeep.com>; Gail Johnson <GJohnson@supremecourt.gov>; Neal Katyal <AskOSG@usdoj.gov>; ANTHONY M. KENNEDY <AKENNEDY@SupremeCourtUS.gov>; Brad Heath Kevin McCoy <justicedepartment@usatoday.com>; Nathan Koppel <nathan.koppel@wsj.com>; Tips Above the Law <tips@abovethelaw.com>; leagle.com <info@leagle.com>; Letters to the Editor <letters@post-dispatch.com>; Adam Liptak <Adam.Liptak@nytimes.com>; Peter McKnight <pmcknight@vancouversun.com>; New York Times Op-Ed <oped@nytimes.com>; Kieran Nicholson: <knicholson@denverpost.com>; "Robert O'Connor" <Robert.OConnor@USDOJ.gov>; Robert Patrick <rpatrick@post-dispatch.com>; Bill Rankin <brankin@ajc.com>; Condoleezza Rice <CRice@State.gov>; Paul Craig Roberts <PaulCraigRoberts@yahoo.com>; John G. Roberts Jr. <JRoberts@SupremeCourt.gov>; ANTONIN SCALIA <ASCALIA@SupremeCourtus.gov>; Equal Justice Society <info@equaljusticesociety.org>; DAVID H. SOUTER <DSOUTER@SupremeCourt.gov>; JOHN PAUL STEVENS <JSTEVENS@SupremeCourt.gov>; William K. Suter <WSuter@SupremeCourt.gov>; Editor The Daily Beast <editorial@thedailybeast.com>; CLARENCE THOMAS <CTHOMAS@SupremeCourt.gov>; Bill Torpy <btorpy@ajc.com>; Joe Ureneck <jureneck@comcast.net>; Equal Justice USA <info@ejusa.org>; Christopher Vasil <cvasil@supremecourt.gov>; Jonathan Weisman <jonathan.weisman@wsj.com>; George F. Will <georgewill@washpost.com>; Aaron Zitner <aaron.zitner@wsj.com>; Pam Agathen <Pam_Agathen@ca8.uscourts.gov>; Melanie Beard <melanie_beard@mow.uscourts.gov>; Shannon Y. Brogan <Shannon_Brogan@mow.uscourts.gov>; "Clerk's Office" <USCA7_Clerk@ca7.uscourts.gov>; Cathy Dolan <cathy_dolan@ca8.uscourts.gov>; William Bill Fauks <Bill_Fauks@moed.uscourts.gov>; Michael E. Gans <Michael_Gans@mow.uscourts.gov>; Eric H. Holder Jr. <AskDOJ@usdoj.gov>; David Kravets <david_kravets@wired.com>; Yvette Lisenby <Yvette_Lisenby@ca8.uscourts.gov>; KEVIN McDERMOTT <kmcdermott@post-dispatch.com>; Kelly McIlvain <Kelly_McIlvain@mow.uscourts.gov>; Newsweek <Letters@newsweek.com>; Patricia L. Brune <dchelp@mow.uscourts.gov>; Jackie Price <Jackie_Price@mow.uscourts.gov>; Amy Smith <Amy_Smith@ca8.uscourts.gov>; Bill Terry <bill_terry@mow.uscourts.gov>; Jim Woodward <jim_woodward@moed.uscourts.gov>; Scott O. Wright <Scott_Wright@MOW.USCOURTS.gov>; Douglas R. Beach <DBeach@stlouisco.com>; Richard C. Bresnahan <RBresnahan@stlouisco.com>; Michael D. Burton <MBurton@stlouisco.com>; Patrick Clifford <PClifford@stlouisco.com>; Robert S. Cohen <RCohen@stlouisco.com>; Tom W. DePriest <TDePriest@stlouisco.com>; Colleen Dolan <CDolan@stlouisco.com>; Judy Preddy Draper <JDraper@stlouisco.com>; John R. Essner <JEssner@stlouisco.com>; Joseph A. Goeke <JGoeke@stlouisco.com>; Steven H. Goldman <SGoldman@stlouisco.com>; James R. Hartenbach <JHartenbach@stlouisco.com>; Dale W. Hood <DHood@stlouisco.com>; Michael T. Jamison <MJamison@stlouisco.com>; Phillip E. Jones <PJones@stlouisco.com>; John F. Kintz <JKintz@stlouisco.com>; Gary Krautmann <GKrautmann@stlouisco.com>; Brenda Stith Loftin <BLoftin@stlouisco.com>; Maura B. McShane <MMcShane@stlouisco.com>; Raymond M. Meyer <Raymond.Meyer@USDOJ.gov>; Gloria Clark Reno <GReno@stlouisco.com>; John A. Ross <JRoss@stlouisco.com>; Mary Bruntrager Schroeder <MSchroeder@stlouisco.com>; Mark D. Seigel <MSeigel@stlouisco.com>; Thea A. Sherry <TSherry@stlouisco.com>; Ellen Levy Siwak <ESiwak@stlouisco.com>; Dennis N. Smith <DSmith@stlouisco.com>; David Lee Vincent <DVincent@stlouisco.com>; Barbara W. Wallace <BWallace@stlouisco.com>; Carolyn C. Whittington <CWhittington@stlouisco.com>
Sent: Thu, October 21, 2010 1:20:52 PM
Subject: I maybe going back to jail
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: David G. Jeep <dgjeep01@yahoo.com>
To: Tami Abdollah <tami.abdollah@latimes.com>; Adam Smith Foundation <info@adamsmithfoundation.com>; Equal Justice America <info@equaljusticeamerica.org>; Eidtor American Chronical <editor@amchron.com>; Amnesty International USA <aimember@aiusa.org>; Christopher Beam <jcbeam@gmail.com>; The Daily Beast <editorial@thedailybeast.com>; Pete Bland <pbland@columbiatribune.com>; Ari B. Bloomekatz <ari.bloomekatz@latimes.com>; Charles M Blow <chblow@nytimes.com>; Jess Bravin <jess.bravin@wsj.com>; JUDGE BUSTERS <alberta1-judgebusters@hotmail.com>; Carl Campanile <carl.campanile@nypost.com>; Staff Caught.net <staff@caught.net>; Camilla Cavendish <camilla.cavendish@thetimes.co.uk>; CBS Evening News <evening@cbsnews.com>; Steve Chapman <schapman@tribune.com>; Chicago Tribune <Letters@tribune.com>; CHRISTINE CHRISTINE BYERS <cbyers@post-dispatch.com>; Federal City <Federalcity@washpost.com>; Jeff Coen <jcoen@tribune.com>; U.S. Commission on Civil Rights COMPLAINT REFERRAL SERVICE <referrals@usccr.gov>; Gloria C. Cox <gcox@unt.edu>; "David Jeep Dave@dgjeep" <Dave@DGJeep.com>; Mary DeLach-Leonard <MDelachLeonard@STLBeacon.org>; Peace Economy News <PEP@Peaceeconomyproject.org>; Editor TomPaine.com <editor@tompaine.com>; editor@californiachronicle.com; The Editors <theeditors@bbc.co.uk>; Kevin Fasick <kevin.fasick@nypost.com>; Mike Christian at 314-280-5222 FBI Report <stlouis@ic.fbi.gov>; Caroline Fredrickson ACLU <action@aclu.org>; Chris Fusco <cfusco@suntimes.com>; Paul Hammel <paul.hammel@owh.com>; Irene Haskins <ihaskins@columbiatribune.com>; 48 Hours <48hours@cbsnews.com>; FeedBack Human Rights First <feedback@humanrightsfirst.org>; Equal Justice Initiative <contact_us@eji.org>; James Janega <jjanega@tribune.com>; David G. Jeep <DGJeep01@Yahoo.com>; David G. Jeep <DGJeep@DGJeep.com>; KansasCityStar <letters@kcstar.com>; Brad Heath Kevin McCoy <justicedepartment@usatoday.com>; KMOV-TV <pressrelease@kmov.com>; Jeremy Kohler <jkohler@post-dispatch.com>; Nathan Koppel <nathan.koppel@wsj.com>; David Kravets <david_kravets@wired.com>; Tips Above the Law <tips@abovethelaw.com>; leagle.com <info@leagle.com>; Letters to the Editor <letters@post-dispatch.com>; Letters to the Editor <letters@washpost.com>; Adam Liptak <Adam.Liptak@nytimes.com>; Los Angeles Times <letters@latimes.com>; Slate Magazine <newsletters@letters.slate.com>; Genral Manager <generalmanager@stltoday.com>; Bill McClellan <bmcclellan@post-dispatch.com>; KEVIN McDERMOTT <kmcdermott@post-dispatch.com>; Peter McKnight <pmcknight@vancouversun.com>; Laura Meckler <laura.meckler@wsj.com>; mediaite <tips@mediaite.com>; Raymond M. Meyer <Raymond.Meyer@USDOJ.gov>; Amnesty International USA Midwest Office <aiusamw@aiusa.org>; Southeast Missourian <bmiller@semissourian.com>; MSNBC on the Internet <letters@msnbc.com>; My Turn Editor Newsweek <myturn@newsweek.com>; New York Times Op-Ed <oped@nytimes.com>; Sky News <news@sky.com>; News Tribune Jefferson City <news@newstribune.com>; McClatchy Newspapers News TIP <web@mcclatchydc.com>; Newsweek <Letters@newsweek.com>; Kieran Nicholson: <knicholson@denverpost.com>; "Patrick M. O'Connell" <poconnell@post-dispatch.com>; "Robert O'Connor" <Robert.OConnor@USDOJ.gov>; Robert Patrick <rpatrick@post-dispatch.com>; Daniel Politi Politi <todayspapers@slate.com>; Bill Rankin <brankin@ajc.com>; Paul Craig Roberts <PaulCraigRoberts@yahoo.com>; Anthony D. Romero ACLU <executive_director@aclu.org>; David Savage <david.savage@latimes.com>; Equal Justice Society <info@equaljusticesociety.org>; St. Louis Business Journal <stlouis@bizjournals.com>; St. Louis Justice and Shares <info@JPS-STL.org>; STEPHEN STEPHEN DEERE <sdeere@post-dispatch.com>; Sunday Morning CBS <sundays@cbsnews.com>; Andrea Tantaros <andrea@andreatantaros.com>; The Joplin Globe Publishing Company <news@joplinglobe.com>; Letters to the Editor The New York Times <letters@nytimes.com>; TheSpringfieldNews-Leader <webeditor@news-leader.com>; Bill Torpy <btorpy@ajc.com>; Joe Ureneck <jureneck@comcast.net>; Equal Justice USA <info@ejusa.org>; Mike Wallace <60m@cbsnews.com>; Jonathan Weisman <jonathan.weisman@wsj.com>; George F. Will <georgewill@washpost.com>; Bob Woodward <woodwardb@washpost.com>; Aaron Zitner <aaron.zitner@wsj.com>
Sent: Thu, October 21, 2010 1:24:33 PM
Subject: I maybe going back to jail
Thanks in advance,
"We live in a Lawless Society...
Time is of the essence".
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
Dave@DGJeep.com
DGJeep@DGJeep.com
