Immunity is an “unlawful Conspiracy”
The FLAW in American Justice
Wednesday, June 29, 2011, 9:39:44 AM
Immunity is “before out of Court”[1] an “unlawful Conspiracy”[2] “extrajudicial”[3] self-serving ministerial rule, at the highest levels of the United States of America’s Executive (prosecutorial) and Justice (judicial) Departments, to deprive We the People the protection of the constitutionally secured Due Process of Law. Immunity “before out of Court,” [4] as handed out in the American Justice System, in purpose and in effect unlawfully covers-up false and malicious Persecutions, out of Court, to such whom he/she knowes will be Indictors, to find any guilty. [5]
for condoning the denial of a Constitutionally secured and congressionally un-abridge-able right to justice and
"fraud upon the court."
Impeach the Supreme Court FIVE for verifiable NOT "good Behaviour,[7]" denying the establishment of justice and abridging a Constitutionally secured and congressionally un-abridge-able right, with their deprivation of substantive justice between the government and the people, CONNICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ET AL. v. THOMPSON (3/29/11) and "fraud upon the court" with Ashcroft v. al-Kidd No. 10–98!!!
The Right of Petition is the right to substantive justice between the government and the people. We do not have any individually enforceable rights in this country, "Everybody, BUT the innocent victim, has "ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY"" for the deprivation of “any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America”[8] e.g., To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process, The Exclusionary Rule, Grounds for Impeachment, Jeep v Obama, Jeep v United States of America 10-1947, Jeep v Jones “The most humble Petition for a Wirt of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115.”
DGJeep "The Earth and everything that's in it" (www.dgjeep.blogspot.com)
Wednesday, June 29, 2011, 9:39:44 AM, 0000 Blank Issue Paper REV 01.doc
[1] Lord Coke Floyd and Barker (1607) Third logical argument end of the paragraph “but if he hath conspired before out of Court, this is extrajudicial; but due examination of Causes out of Court, and inquiring by Testimonies, Et similia, is not any Conspiracy, for this he ought to do; but subornation of Witnesses, and false and malicious Persecutions, out of Court, to such whom he knowes will be Indictors, to find any guilty, &c. amounts to an unlawful Conspiracy.” (emphasis and underlining added)
[6] Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, and Chief Justice John G. Roberts
[7] Article III Section 1 the Constitution for the United States of America
No comments:
Post a Comment