Monday, December 12, 2011

Re: Return of Writ of Certiorari USCA8 11-2425




Label/Receipt Number: 0311 1660 0000 6194 6824
Expected Delivery Date: December 9, 2011
Class: Priority Mail®
Service(s): Delivery Confirmation™
Status: Delivered

Your item was delivered at 7:43 am on December 12, 2011 in WASHINGTON, DC 20543.

  Detailed Results:
 
 Delivered, December 12, 2011, 7:43 am, WASHINGTON, DC 20543
 Notice Left (No Authorized Recipient Available), December 11, 2011, 10:05 am, WASHINGTON, DC 20543
 Arrival at Unit, December 11, 2011, 9:53 am, WASHINGTON, DC 20022
 Depart USPS Sort Facility, December 08, 2011, HAZELWOOD, MO 63042
 Processed through USPS Sort Facility, December 07, 2011, 10:20 pm, HAZELWOOD, MO 63042
 Dispatched to Sort Facility, December 07, 2011, 5:47 pm, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63101
 Acceptance, December 07, 2011, 9:56 am, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63101

December 07, 2011 
William K. Suter, Clerk
c/o Gail Johnson
Supreme Court of the United States of America
Washington, D.C.   20543-0001

Re: Return of Writ of Certiorari USCA8 11-2425

Dear Mr. Suter,
     I realize you are ALMOST as much a victim of this malicious, corrupt, dishonest and incompetent system as Donna R. Andrieu,[1] an assistant district attorney in New Orleans and myself.  It is time for an American spring, much like the Arab Spring[2] that swept out the old ways last year in the Middle East.
     I AGAIN make formal note, I am attempting to respond to the best of my indigent pro-se abilities and 28 U.S.C. § 2111, Harmless error[3] that does not affect the affect the substantial rights of the parties.  I CAN ONLY DO, WHAT I CAN DO in my reduced, victimized position.
     I AGAIN make formal note of my indigent / pro se status which is “GRANTED” and confirmed for USCA8 11-2425 per the enclosed Mandate dated November 29, 2011, the JUDGMENT for the case below, Case #11-2425 United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, dated October 4, 2011, the Memorandum and Order case#4:11-cv-931-cas dated June 8, 2011 from the United States District Court Eastern District of Missouri Eastern District. 
     You make note of two issues in your November 29, 2011 letter
1.      “The lower court opinions must be appended for the U.S. court of appeals.”
a.      I have several times before enclosed these opinions from the U.S. court of appeals case #11-2425 such as I received and had with the original submission in October 5, 2011.  I noted them in the appendix in the November 21, 2011 submission as pages B1 and B2.  I now include the recently received Mandate dated November 29, 2011 and note it as B3.  They are Judgment dated October 4, 2011 (B1-B2) and now Mandate dated November 29, 2011 (B1) noted in the revised appendix as pages B1-B3. 
2.      “A copy of the corrected petition must be served on opposing counsel.
a.      I as I have stated prior per a notarized certificate of service dated 11/21/11, see item “J” in the appendix, done all that I can as an indigent pro se victim.
     I re-enclosing and re-transmitting the following:
1.      An EMERGENCY WRIT OF CERTIORARI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Appeal USCA8 11-2425 (Approximately 70 pages with Appendix) Signed and notarized Monday, November 21, 2011.
2.      SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS page D6 of 6 Signed and notarized Monday, November 21, 2011.
3.      A certificate addressing service for this and prior cases page J1 of 1 Signed and notarized Monday, November 21, 2011.
4.      A Mandate for case #11-2425 dated 11/29/11 and a revised page
5.      A revised Appendix Page 20 of 21
     If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
“Time is of the essence”




David G. Jeep

enclosure

cc:  My Blog - Wednesday, December 07, 2011, 1:25:21 PM


[1] “Justices Rebuke a New Orleans Prosecutor” New York Times, November 8, 2011, By ADAM LIPTAK
[2] The Arab Spring started with the Tunisia suicide protester Mohammed Bouazizi.  It would be Free Speech and I have the paperwork to prove I am competent.  “We the People” have inviolable and inalienable rights in this country.  People who reject or deny those natural rights as sovereign are the insane ones.
[3] 28 USC § 2111. Harmless error, On the hearing of any appeal or writ of certiorari in any case, the court shall give judgment after an examination of the record without regard to errors or defects which do not affect the substantial rights of the parties.

Appendix

  1. Copy of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ORDER OF DISMISSAL NO. 4:11-CV-931 CAS, SIGNED AND DATED 8TH day of June, 2011 CHARLES A. SHAW. (A1-A8 PAGES)
  2. Copy of UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 11-2425 JUDGMENT DATED October 04, 2011 Order Entered at the Direction of the Court: Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit /s/ Michael E. Gans with Mandate dated 11/29/11(B1-B3 pages) REVISION 12-07-11
  3. A copy of the Original petition for an order of protection that was made into and order by Judge Goeke, served on the petitioner by the police and heard by ordered heard by Commissioner Jones November 20, 2003.  On its face it is flagrantly fraudulent as it lists NO PROBABLE cause, page _19_ of _21_ of this petition.
  4. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Signed and notarized Wednesday, November 02, 2011(D-1-D6)
  5. Copy of Letter of transmittal (3 pages) and “A Cause of Action, Jurisdictional Statement and Pleading for the “Protection of the Laws”” In the Supreme Court of the United States of America Wednesday (8 Pages), dated February 23, 2011 (E1 of E11 Pages)
  6. Copy of Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court, Supreme Court of the United States dated September 15, 2011 Re: UN-acknowledged petition for the protection of the laws, dated Wednesday, February 23, 2011 as enclosed (F1 of F2 Pages)
  7. Copy of letter to William K. Suter, Clerk, c/o Gail Johnson, Supreme Court of the United States of America dated October 5, 2011 Re:I am in receipt of your letter dated September 22, 2011[1] with enclosure An EMERGENCY WRIT OF CERTIORARI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Appeal USCA8 11-2425, Case No. 4:11-cv-0931-CAS signed and dated October 5, 2011 (G1 of G15 Pages)
  8. Copy of letter to William K. Suter, Clerk, c/o Gail Johnson, Supreme Court of the United States of America dated October 20, 2011 Re:   I am in receipt of your letter dated October 13, 2011[2] (H1-H4 pages)with enclosures as listed above but not attached items 7, 5, 3, 4,and 2
  9. Copy of An EMERGENCY WRIT OF CERTIORARI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Appeal USCA8 11-2425, Case No. 4:11-cv-0931-CAS revised per the Clerks Letters signed and dated Monday, November 21, 2011.Monday, November 21, 2011 (I1-I21)
  10. A certificate addressing service for this and prior cases (J1 Pages)
  11. Copy of letter to William K. Suter, Clerk, c/o Gail Johnson, Supreme Court of the United States of America dated November 2, 2011, Re:  I have now received the enclosed petition. (K1-K2)
  12. A copy of response letter dated today December 7, 2011 REVISION 12-07-11






[1] Return of Jeep v. Obama et al stamped received Office of the Clerk, Supreme Court U.S. September 21, 2011
[2] Return of Jeep v. Obama et al stamped received Office of the Clerk, Supreme Court U.S. Oct-12-2011

Posted by at
Labels: , ,