Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Return re-transmittal of Petition for Writ of Certiorari USCA8 11-2425 - This is another example of the clear malicious, corrupt, dishonest and incompetent conspiracy against rights, "Egotism is the anesthetic that dulls the pain of stupidity."[1] Return re-transmittal of Petition for Writ of Certiorari USCA8 11-2425

DAVID JEEP has requested that you receive a Track & Confirm update, as shown below.
Track & Confirm e-mail update information provided by the U.S. Postal Service.
Label Number: 0311 2550 0003 9960 8495
Service Type: Priority Mail Delivery Confirmation
Shipment Activity Location Date& Time
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Delivered WASHINGTON DC 20543 01/09/12 7:36am
Notice Left (No WASHINGTON DC 20543 01/08/12 12:24pm Authorized Recipient Available)
Arrival at Unit WASHINGTON DC 20022 01/08/12 10:20am
Where was it for 8 days???????
Depart USPS Sort SANTA CLARITA CA 91383 12/30/11 Facility
Processed through USPS SANTA CLARITA CA 91383 12/29/11 8:22pm Sort Facility
Depart USPS Sort HAZELWOOD MO 63042 12/28/11 Facility
Processed at USPS HAZELWOOD MO 63042 12/28/11 12:09am Origin Sort Facility
Acceptance SAINT LOUIS MO 63155 12/27/11 8:00am
Expected Delivery By:
December 29, 2011
Delivery Confirmation

William K. Suter, Clerk
c/o Gail Johnson
Supreme Court of the United States of America
Washington, D.C.   20543-0001

Re: Receipt of your Letter dated 12/14/11 and Return re-transmittal of Petition for Writ of Certiorari USCA8 11-2425

Dear Mr. Suter,
     I take exception to your extortion of my signature on page D1 of 6 as enclosed.  I had in contradiction to your assertion SIGNED and notarized the in forma pauperis on page D6 of 6.  I have now signed the un executed nonessential cover page with blanks not filled in at your insistence over my, here noted, objection. 
     This is another example of the clear malicious, corrupt, dishonest and incompetent conspiracy against rights, "Egotism is the anesthetic that dulls the pain of stupidity."[1]  Why should I have to sign an unexecuted form, no title?  Everything on the form under my control has been and is documented, “GRANTED,” by the
Lower Court
’s Orders and my prior communications. 
     I AGAIN make formal note, I am attempting to respond to the best of my indigent pro-se abilities and 28 U.S.C. § 2111, Harmless error[2] that does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.  I CAN ONLY DO, WHAT I CAN DO in my reduced, victimized position.
     I AGAIN make formal note of my indigent / pro se status which is “GRANTED” and confirmed for USCA8 11-2425 per the enclosed Mandate dated November 29, 2011 (B3), the JUDGMENT for the case below, Case #11-2425 United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, dated October 4, 2011 (B1&B2), the Memorandum and Order case#4:11-cv-931-cas dated June 8, 2011 from the United States District Court Eastern District of Missouri Eastern District (A1-A8). 
     You make note of two issues in your December 14, 2011 letter
1.      A singed not fully executed, no title, page D1 of 6 of the petition for in forma pauperis dated 12/20/11.
2.      “A copy of the corrected petition must be served on opposing counsel.
a.      I, as I have stated prior, per a notarized certificate of service dated 11/21/11, see item “J” in the appendix, done all that I can as an indigent pro se victim.
     I am again re-enclosing and re-transmitting the some or all of the following:
1.      An EMERGENCY WRIT OF CERTIORARI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Appeal USCA8 11-2425 (Approximately 70 pages with Appendix) Signed and notarized Monday, November 21, 2011.
2.      SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS page D6 of 6 Signed and notarized Monday, November 21, 2011.
3.      A certificate addressing service for this and prior cases page J1 of 1 Signed and notarized Monday, November 21, 2011.
4.      I am noting this letter as page M1 and M2 on the revised appendix
5.      A revised Appendix page “An EMERGENCY WRIT OF CERTIORARI - Page 20 of 21
     If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
“Time is of the essence”




David G. Jeep

enclosure

cc:  My Blog - Tuesday, December 20, 2011, 10:36:06 AM


[1] Francis William Leahy (August 27, 1908 – June 21, 1973) was an American football player, coach, college athletics administrator, and professional sports executive. He served as the head football coach at Boston College from 1939 to 1940 and at the University of Notre Dame from 1941 to 1943 and again from 1946 to 1953, compiling a career college football record of 107–13–9. His winning percentage of .864 is the second best in NCAA Division I football history, trailing only that fellow Notre Dame Fighting Irish coach, Knute Rockne, for whom Leahy played from 1928 to 1930.
[2] 28 USC § 2111. Harmless error, On the hearing of any appeal or writ of certiorari in any case, the court shall give judgment after an examination of the record without regard to errors or defects which do not affect the substantial rights of the parties.