-->
President Barack Hussein Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20500-0001
Re: Where does an innocent SANE[1] person go for the protection of the Law?
Jeep v. Obama 4:12-cv-703-CEJ
Dear Mr. Obama,[2]
I preface by saying again We the People need to "Re-New the Love of Virtue – Justice, Reciprocity."[3]
I read/heard your recent comments[4] following the Aurora, Colorado shooting in a movie theater and I concur that it was "heinous crime to justice." No one feels the pain of the victims more than I. But in America TODAY there are "heinous crimes to justice" being perpetrated EVERYDAY by "The Most Corrupt Organization in the World"[5] our United States of America justice department.
When EVERY PERSON[6] or WHOEVER[7] deprives any person "of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" it is a "heinous crime to justice," as in both Columbine and Aurora Colorado but, especially so when it is done under color of law by those entrusted by We the People to protect us from the same!!! There is NO moral difference between a Judge[8] who renders or fraudulently contributes to a judgment "without due process of law" and a mass murder or a thief who kills or steals at gunpoint "without due process of law."
It is "without due process of law" that makes a "heinous crime to justice!!!!" I am just finishing up John Grisham's "The Confession" be assured that someday there will be an Aurora Colorado where the victims, both the instigator and the seemingly innocent deliberately indifferent[9] casualties can be and will be vindicated by the facts. They will not be able to be written off as delusional.
"Justice is the end of government. It is the end of civil society. It ever has been and ever will be pursued until it be obtained, or until liberty be lost in the pursuit."[10]
Where does a person go for Justice in America when the absolutely immune royalist guild of Judges have flagrantly overridden constitutional rights in the Jane Crow[11]/Plea Bargain[12] era… the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building,[13] a Safeway in Arizona, a military base in Waco Texas or a theater in Aurora, Colorado?[14] Are maybe flambé like the Tunisia suicide protester Mohammed Bouazizi?
You definitely can't get justice for criminally[15] "false and malicious Persecutions" [16] in our justice system, because of the "unlawful Conspiracy" [17] to obfuscate them "before out of Court?"[18]
Where does an innocent person go for the protection[19] of the Law?[20] You, the PRESIDENT, will not enforce the criminal[21] law!!!! The CORRUPT, malicious, dishonest and incompetent[22]Justice system will not even hear a 7th Amendment[23] civil[24] petition questioning the criminal[25] assertion of the corrupt and malicious royalist guild of Judges?[26]
I would VERY much like to be civilized person, committed to the Love of Virtue – Justice, Reciprocity"[27] but, I need the credible support of a committed civilization/government to support and defend my civil rights as established with the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th and 14th Amendments, Title 18 § 242. Criminal Deprivation of rights under color of law and Title 42 § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights.
"To assume that Congress, which had enacted a criminal sanction directed against state judicial officials, intended sub silentio to exempt those same officials from the civil counterpart approaches the incredible." (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 363 (1983)). I would assert it an incredible, fantastic or delusional scenario!!!!!
I sometimes feel like Dorothy in the Wizard of OZ:
Dorothy:
If you were really great and powerful, you'd keep your promises!
Wizard:
Do you presume to criticize the Great Oz? You ungrateful creatures!
Think yourselves lucky that I'm giving you an audience tomorrow, instead of twenty years from now! Oh! The Great Oz has spoken!
Oh! Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. The Great, Powerful
-- has spoken --
I know what is under the black robes of the royalist judiciary, there is no hiding. If the Guild of Judges were truly great and powerful, they would admit their human limitations, malice, corruption, dishonesty and incompetence[28] and keep their promises to We the People via their oaths of office "I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same"[29] and if sued in the respectful form of a petition,[30] never fail to comply with the judgment of a 7th Amendment[31] civil court.[32]
In closing, I made a similar question/request 3 years ago and was illegally imprisoned for 411 days[33] for utilizing my free speech!!! I was arrested March 11, 2009 on a charge of making threatening communications and held in custody without bond until April 26, 2010 (411 Days). (see Eastern District of Missouri US Court case #4:09cr0659-CDP , Doc #74 Exhibits A thru F) I was defending our constitution and civil rights, albeit strictly verbally at the time via my first amendment right to FREE Speech (United States of America, Appellee, v. Russell Kelner, Appellant, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. - 534 F.2d 1020).
If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
cc: E-mailed to a select group of favorites
[1] I have TWO government funded psychological exams attesting to my competency.
[2] There are entirely TOOOOO many titles of nobility floating around!!!! Especially among those that refuse to do their jobs, "he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed" Article. II., Section. 2. of the Constitution for United States of America. "To assume that Congress, which had enacted a criminal sanction (,) directed against state judicial officials, [Footnote 2/26] intended sub silentio to exempt those same officials from the civil counterpart approaches the incredible. [Footnote 2/27]" Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 363 (1983) I would assert it an incredible fantastic or delusional scenario!!!!!
[3] A letter I sent you as referenced above dated on or about Thursday, July 12, 2012.
[5] See letter sent on or about Wednesday, June 30, 2010 addressed and Re: as follows:
President Barack Hussein Obama
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest
Washington, DC 20500-0001
Re: Dunning my President.
Immunity is not a requirement for independence
The Most Corrupt Organization in the World.
[8] Or "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process" (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983))
[9] I say deliberately indifferent because they have without love of requisite virtue allowed the CORRUPT, malicious, dishonest and incompetent Justice system to with absolute immunity create the issue.
[10] FEDERALIST No. 51, "The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments" For the Independent Journal. Wednesday, February 6, 1788. by James Madison
[11] The "Jane Crow" Era, the courts preference for a mother's/woman's rights over a father's/man's rights in Domestic Relation Law
The "Jane Crow" Era, "It doesn't take a cynic to point out that when a woman is getting a divorce, what she may truly fear is not violence, but losing the house or kids. Under an exparte order of protection, if she's willing to fib to the judge and say she is "in fear" of her children's father, she will get custody and money and probably the house."
A fait accompli, "A man against whom a frivolous exparte order of protection has been brought starts to lose any power in his divorce proceeding. They do start decompensating, and they do start to have emotional issues, and they do start developing post-traumatic stress disorders. They keep replaying in their minds the tape of what happened to them in court. It starts this whole vicious downward cycle. They've been embarrassed and shamed in front of their family and friends, unjustly, and they totally lose any sense of self-control and self-respect. They may indeed become verbally abusive. It's difficult for the court to see where that person was prior to the restraining order." "The Booming Domestic Violence Industry" - Massachusetts News, 08/02/99, By John Maguire, Hitting below the belt Monday, 10/25/99 12:00 ET, By Cathy Young, Salon - Divorced men claim discrimination by state courts, 09/07/99, By Erica Noonan, Associated Press, Dads to Sue for Discrimination, 08/24/99, By Amy Sinatra, ABCNEWS.com,The Federal Scheme to Destroy Father-Child Relationships, by Jake Morphonios, 02/13/08
[12] In the Jane Crow/plea bargain era, how does one fight the corrupt and malicious actions of a judge, the dishonesty and denial of exculpable evidence by prosecutors, the "knowingly false testimony by police officers" or "a frivolous exparte order of protection" in the Jane Crow family courts under color of law when the deal is controlled and slanted in favor of the largest malicious, corrupt, dishonest and incompetent police state in the modern world. Plea out now before trial to X years or we go for the maximum X plus 10 years, if not life in prison. That is not a negotiation; that is an offer you can't refuse.
[13] See letter dated 3/9/09 "Tell Me Again Why I Shouldn't Blow Up a "Murrah Federal Building"" footnoted as "A rhetorical QUESTION, not intended as a threat, but if anyone feels the need to arrest I say come on, I would love to make this into a freedom of speech issue also."
[14] In the Jane Crow plea bargain era, how does one fight the corrupt and malicious actions of a judge, the dishonesty and denial of exculpable evidence by prosecutors, the "knowingly false testimony by police officers" or "a frivolous exparte order of protection" (ibid.)
[15] Title 18 § 242. Criminal Action for the Deprivation of rights under color of law "To assume that Congress, which had enacted a criminal sanction directed against state judicial officials, [Footnote 2/26] intended sub silentio to exempt those same officials from the civil counterpart approaches the incredible. [Footnote 2/27]" Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 363 (1983). I would assert it an incredible, fantastic or delusional scenario!!!!!
[16] Lord Coke Floyd and Barker (1607) "Judge or Justice of Peace: and the Law will not admit any proof against this vehement and violent presumption of Law, that a Justice sworn to do Justice will do injustice; but if he hath conspired before out of Court, this is extrajudicial; but due examination of Causes out of Court, and inquiring by Testimonies, Et similia, is not any Conspiracy, for this he ought to do; but subornation of Witnesses, and false and malicious Persecutions, out of Court, to such whom he knowes will be Indictors, to find any guilty, &c. amounts to an unlawful Conspiracy."
[19] "The very essence of civil liberty certainly consists in the right of every individual to claim the protection of the laws, whenever he receives an injury." Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 5 U. S. 163 (1803). (Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 397 (1971))
[20] The protection of the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th and 14th Amendments, Title 18 § 242. Criminal Action for the Deprivation of rights under color of law and Title 42 § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights
[21] Title 18 § 242. Criminal Action for the Deprivation of rights under color of law "To assume that Congress, which had enacted a criminal sanction directed against state judicial officials, [Footnote 2/26] intended sub silentio to exempt those same officials from the civil counterpart approaches the incredible. [Footnote 2/27]" Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 363 (1983). I would assert it an incredible, fantastic or delusional scenario!!!!!
[22] Incompetence is the most insidious and it is covered up by the gratuitous grants of dishoesty, malice andcorruption. As regards state Prosecutors, "States can discipline federal prosecutors, rarely do" 12/08/2010 USAToday by Brad Heath & Kevin McCoy ("Federal prosecutors series"). The "OPR is a black hole. Stuff goes in, nothing comes out," said Jim Lavine, the president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. "The public, the defense attorneys and the judiciary have lost respect for the government's ability to police themselves."
As regards law enforcement "Convicted defendants left uninformed of forensic flaws found by Justice Dept." By Spencer S. Hsu, The Washington Post published The Washington Post reported on cases that demonstrate problems of COMPETENCY in forensic analysis that have been known for nearly 40 years by the Justice Department.
[23] 7th Amendment, "In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law."
[25] "To assume that Congress, which had enacted a criminal sanction directed against state judicial officials, [Footnote 2/26] intended sub silentio to exempt those same officials from the civil counterpart approaches the incredible. [Footnote 2/27]" Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 363 (1983) I would assert it an incredible fantastic or delusional scenario!!!!!
[26] 8th Circuit Court of Appeals cases Jeep v Obama #12-2435, Jeep v Obama #11-2425, Jeep v United States of America 10-1947," Jeep v Bennett 08-1823, "Jeep v Jones 07-2614, and the most humble Petitions for a Wirt of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115 and 11-8211."
[27] A letter I sent you as referenced above dated on or about Thursday, July 12, 2012.
[28] Incompetence is the most insidious and it is covered up by the gratuitous grants of dishoesty, malice andcorruption. As regards state Prosecutors, "States can discipline federal prosecutors, rarely do" 12/08/2010 USAToday by Brad Heath & Kevin McCoy ("Federal prosecutors series"). The "OPR is a black hole. Stuff goes in, nothing comes out," said Jim Lavine, the president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. "The public, the defense attorneys and the judiciary have lost respect for the government's ability to police themselves."
As regards law enforcement "Convicted defendants left uninformed of forensic flaws found by Justice Dept." By Spencer S. Hsu, The Washington Post published The Washington Post reported on cases that demonstrate problems of COMPETENCY in forensic analysis that have been known for nearly 40 years by the Justice Department.
[29] Title 5 › Part III › Subpart B › Chapter 33 › Subchapter II › § 3331 - OATH OF OFFICE - United State Code of Law
[30] 1st Amendment: "Congress shall make no law… abridging the… the right of the people peaceably… to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
[31] 7th Amendment, "In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law."
[32] "The very essence of civil liberty certainly consists in the right of every individual to claim the protection of the laws whenever he receives an injury. One of the first duties of government is to afford that protection. In Great Britain, the King himself is sued in the respectful form of a petition, and he never fails to comply with the judgment of his court." Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 5 U. S. 163 (1803)
[33] Overall it has been 9.19 years, 3,356 calendar days, 53,690 waking hours, 3,221,380 waking minutes, 193,282,805 waking seconds, as of Monday July 23, 2012 03:30:08.20 PM, but who is counting???
--
Thanks in advance
To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process
"agere sequitor esse"
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
E-mail is preferred Dave@DGJeep.com, DGJeep@DGJeep.com
(314) 514-5228
David G. Jeep
c/o The Bridge
1610 Olive Street,
Saint Louis, MO 63103-2316
