First-Class Mail® Certified Mail™ Label Number: 7014-1820-0001-8020-8383
Expected Delivery Day: Thursday, November 13, 2014Delivered | WASHINGTON, DC 20543 | November 17, 2014 10:59 am |
Andrew Downs
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543-0001
Re: Petition for Rehearing - Petition for Writ of Certiorari 14-5551 David Jeep v. Government of United States - DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 25, 2014.
Dear Mr. Downs,
Do not insult my intelligence by even thinking that your decisions are based on sublime reasoning.[1] You are as history has proved time and again, unrestrained, self-centered, self-promoting political oligarchs. Do "We the People" need a constitutional amendment to restrain your corruption of "We the People's" inalienable constitutional rights?
"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity."
Martin Luther King "Strength to Love" 1963
Martin Luther King, Jr. knew that the "separate but equal" was always separate BUT NEVER EQUAL. King's pacific explanation was sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity. Today when you consider the Supreme Court's support of MARTIAL LAW in the WORLD WAR on DRUGS[2] and MARTIAL LAW in the Jane Crow[3] Era I cannot be limited by King's pacific tenor. "We the People's" inalienable constitutional rights need more protection than an independent, self-admittedly[4] "corrupt, malicious, dishonest, sincerely ignorant, conscientiously stupid and incompetent" judiciary can provide!!!! "We the People" constitutionally DEMAND a jury of our peers both criminal and civil!
To hear the Supreme Court tell us, via their unrestricted "absolutely immune" power, "We the People," all evidence to the contrary, traded the "King can do no WRONG" for the ABSOLUTELY IMMUNE actions of the "malicious or corrupt" judges(Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)),[5] the "malicious or dishonest" prosecutor Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976), [6] the "knowingly false testimony by police officers" (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)),[7] corrupt, malicious, dishonest, sincerely ignorant conscientiously stupid[8] and incompetent actions[9] of federal, state, local, and regional legislators (Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997) Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367, 372, 372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138)[10] and the corrupt, malicious, dishonest, sincerely ignorant conscientiously stupid[11] and incompetent actions of "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who (spouses) were integral parts of the judicial process" (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)) [12] acting under color of law to render ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION[13] of inalienable Constituional rights under color of law.
If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
enclosure
a. "A Petition for a Constitutional Amendment dated Monday, November 10, 2014
cc: Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Congressman Wm. Lacy Clay, Senator Claire McCaskill, Senator Roy Blunt and Donald B. Verrilli Jr. Solicitor General - My Blog - Monday, November 10, 2014, 5:10:46 PM
A Petition for a Constitutional
Amendment:
"Corruption, malice, dishonesty, sincere ignorance, conscientious stupidity and incompetence ARE NOT and never have been covered by ANY grant of immunity, under color of "We the People's" CONSTITUTIONAL law.
Furthermore the constitutional government of the United States of America is civilly strictly liable to the instant injured individual person whenever or wherever any government agent acts, under color of law, to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
This civil liability is and has always been enforceable by the VII Amendment's jury trial requirements."
Senator Claire McCaskill
5850 Delmar Blvd., Ste. A
St. Louis, MO 63112-2346
Phone: (314) 367-1364
Fax: (314) 361-8649
Re: Petition for an amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America - Petition for Rehearing - Petition for Writ of Certiorari 14-5551 David Jeep v. Government of United States - DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 25, 2014.
Dear Ms. McCaskill,
Please give the enclosed petition for an amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America your attention.
"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity."
Martin Luther King "Strength to Love" 1963
Martin Luther King, Jr. knew that the "separate but equal" was always separate BUT NEVER EQUAL. King's pacific explanation was sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity. Today when you consider the Supreme Court's support of MARTIAL LAW in the WORLD WAR on DRUGS[14] and MARTIAL LAW in the Jane Crow[15] Era I cannot be limited by King's pacific tenor.
If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
enclosure
a. Letter to the Supreme Court dated Monday, November 10, 2014
b. "A Petition for a Constitutional Amendment" dated Monday, November 10, 2014
[1] MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissenting in the Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883) creating sophisticated separate and UNEQUAL racial segregation and the ongoing Jim Crow discrimination over the "necessary and proper" "ex industria" "Act to protect all citizens in their civil and legal rights." 18 Stat. 335, enacted March 1, 1875
[2] The People of Ferguson Missouri have lived under the reign of MARTIAL LAW in the WORLD-WAR on Drugs for TOO LONG!!!!! They need no further proof!! But for the uninformed I offer "The Butterfly Effect of Bad Science." http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2014/11/the-butterfly-effect-of-bad-science-eg.html Not to mention "civil asset forfeiture, which allows the government, without ever securing a conviction or even filing a criminal charge, to seize property suspected of having ties to crime." http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/10/us/police-use-department-wish-list-when-deciding-which-assets-to-seize.html?emc=edit_th_20141110&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=57069838&_r=0
[3] Petition for Writ of Certiorari 14-5551 David Jeep v. Government of United States
[4] "This immunity applies even when the judge is accused of acting maliciously and corruptly, and it "is not for the protection or benefit of a malicious or corrupt judge, but for the benefit of the public, whose interest it is that the judges should be at liberty to exercise their functions with independence and without fear of consequences." (Scott v. Stansfield, L.R. 3 Ex. 220, 223 (1868), quoted in Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350.)" Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 554 (1967)
[5] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Judicial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY is based on a skewed reading, overlooking the noted exception that absolute ANYTHING creates, of Lord Coke, Floyd and Barker (1607) ruling from an acknowledged CORRUPT court, the Star Chamber.
[6] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976) Prosecutorial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
[7] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983) Police ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
[8] "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." Martin Luther King "Strength to Love" 1963
[9] The recent Government Shut Down comes to mind, but the Black Robed Royalist Article III Supreme Court had already handed our legislators absolute immunity for their legislative actions, Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997).
[10] Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997) Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367, 372, 372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138
[11] "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." Martin Luther King "Strength to Love" 1963
[12] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983) ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"
[13] "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it." Lord Acton in a letter he wrote to scholar and ecclesiastic Mandell Creighton, dated April 1887.
[14] The People of Ferguson Missouri have lived under the reign of MARTIAL LAW in the WORLD-WAR on Drugs for TOO LONG!!!!! They need no further proof!! But for the uninformed I offer "The Butterfly Effect of Bad Science." http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2014/11/the-butterfly-effect-of-bad-science-eg.html
[15] Petition for Writ of Certiorari 14-5551 David Jeep v. Government of United States
--
Thanks in advance,
To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process
"Agere sequitur esse"
"Time is of the essence"
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
My E-mail addresses are David.G.Jeep@GMail.com orDGJeep01@yahoo.com
(314) 514-5228
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
My E-mail addresses are David.G.Jeep@GMail.com orDGJeep01@yahoo.com
David G. Jeep
GENERAL DELIVERY
Saint Louis , MO 63155-9999
No comments:
Post a Comment