DGJeep v United States of America, NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW. "“Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity” MLKing"

USPS tracking 7018 0140 0000 8495 8680

POSTED July 27, 2022 at 5:18 pm - SAINT LOUIS, MO 6310

Delivered, Individual Picked Up at Postal Facility 08/02/2022 11:47am WASHINGTON DC 20543 Reply STOP to cancel

 

Download as PDF Roberts only

 

Download as PDF as mailed

 

John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States

One First Street N.E.

Washington, DC 20543-0001

 

Re: 1^st Amendment Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States - DGJeep v United States of America, NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.^[1]

 

Dear People,

The fraud^[2] on the court by a judicial officer of the court with a fraudulent^[3] NOT "facially valid court order"[4] that was reckonably^[5] issued "in the "clear absence of all jurisdiction,"[6] "beyond debate"[7] "sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would have understood that what he is doing violates that right"[8]^[9] - the fraud in the FACTS / documentation of the deprivation of my rights has never been questioned.

My liberty rights, my paternity rights, my property rights, were unconstitutionally deprived on November 3. 2003, 7:55pm CT[10].  Since that time petitioner has, for 19 years, with 411 days in jail and 8 trips[11] through the Federal District, Circuit and Supreme Court been pursuing First and Seventh Amendment constitutional redress[12] for the deprivation of constitutional rights.

The only issue before this court is the First and Seventh Amendment CIVILIZED redress[13] of a deprivation[14] of rights.

How can rights, privileges and immunities secured by the constitution and immunity for the [non-exigent] deprivation of rights, privileges and immunities secured by the constitution, both be constitutional?

Petitioner states his support of the potential need for Ex Parte Orders of Protection[15] as statutorily and constitutionally authorized.  But when constitutional Due Process of the Statute is not followed it becomes an issue for First and Seventh Amendment Redress[16]. 

If there is anything further, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

 

 

David G. Jeep

 

enclosure: Filing Fee of $300 included – US Postal Money Order

 

cc: Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, Stephen G. Breyer, Associate Justice, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson, 104th Associate Justice, Sandra Day O'Connor (Retired), Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, (Retired) Associate Justice David H. Souter (Retired), Associate Justice, Stephen G. Breyer, (Retired), Associate Justice

      www.DGJeep.com – file

---

[1] I apologize, but I see no need to bind, in color, a one page document..

[2] Fraus omnia corrumpit - "fraud corrupts all." – a long standing principle according to which the discovery of fraud invalidates all aspects of a judicial decision or arbitral award.

[3] The assertion of a misdemeanor traffic violation does not provide REASONABLE probable cause for an ex parte order of protection.  Clearly based on the original SERVED handwritten petition dated 11-03-03, there was a complete absence of jurisdiction for the stated charge.  

[4] Stump v. Sparkman,435 U.S. 356-57 (1978) PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003)

[5] If reason (reckonabilty) does not limit jurisdiction with probable cause, nothing can."reckonability" is a needful characteristic of any law worthy of the name."  Antonin Scalia: The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules,  56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175, 1175-81 (1989)

[6]  Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12, 112 S.Ct. 286, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991) (per curiam) PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003)

[7] Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011), Mullenix v. Luna 577 U. S. _(2015)

[8] Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U. S. 635, 640 (1987), Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011)

[9] "To this day, I am haunted by the vivid memory of the confirming shrug from the Police Officer when I questioned it as served on November 3, 2003.  I am further haunted by the memory of the same confirming shrug when Commissioner Jones first saw the absurdity of the court order on the bench November 20, 2003 as my attorney then highlighted as he repeated his prior objections."

[10] And Criminal 18 U.S.C. § 241 &; 242 and Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985

^[11] Petitions for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856

[12] And Criminal 18 U.S.C. § 241 &; 242 and Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985

[13] Currently valued at $100,000,000.00

[14] And Criminal 18 U.S.C. § 241 &; 242 and Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985

[15] And the same for traffic laws

[16] And Criminal 18 U.S.C. § 241 &; 242 and Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985

 

And YES... "Jane Crow" discrimination is REAL = Jane Crow Discrimination = Fathers are disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America!

 

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

 

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #403

St. Louis, MO 63103-2547