Saturday, July 22, 2023
Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543-0001
Re: DGJeep v. United States - abolition of the Supreme Court's UNREGULATED Jurisdiction for ON-GOING conspiracy to "defraud"[1] the United States and / or the criminal conspiracy to the deprivation of constitutional rights[2]
Dear People,
Abolition of the Supreme Court's UNREGULATED Jurisdiction[3] for ON-GOING conspiracy to defraud the United States[4] and / or the criminal conspiracy to the deprivation of constitutional rights.[5] The Country has many issues with the Supreme Court's[6] political decisions.[7] Mine (DGJeep v. United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856) and DOJ report # 265705-BPB) is but one.
It should be noted that the Supreme Court (a.k.a. "Black Robed Royalist or the United States "Star Chamber") claims "super-duper"[8] absolute immunity, as opposed to just Trump's regular absolute immunity. The Article III judiciary claims super-duper absolute immunity for anything and EVERYTHING they have ever done in office. Hopefully the new "Code of Ethics" will acknowledge a VII Amendment remedy for the deprivation of rights. [9]
I note Jack Smith is about to prosecute Donald Trump for the same i.e., fraud and deprivation of rights. I just hope he includes the fraud that got Trump elected in 2016 and then tainted his three political actors on the supreme court with his fraud, fraus omnia corrumpit - fraud corrupts all. [10]
Note - there is no statute of limitation[11] for ON-GOING instant "fraud"[12] and / or the instant criminal[13] deprivation of a constitutional right for the still living VICTIM. Additionally, my son, even after my death would have a case, not only for my case, but for the instant fraud against him and his right to a living FULLY viable father. He was victimized by the court's and, although I would never ask him to take sides, his mother's corruption.
UNREGULATED Jurisdiction was NEVER conceived of by the founding fathers. Look at Article III, Section 2, second paragraph, last phrase of the last sentence:
"the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make."
I would think the Founders thought a simple act of congress would REGULATE the court's jurisdiction[14] to avoid an undemocratic "Star Chamber," "Black Robed Royalist" appointed for life from taking undemocratic power.
A simple act of congress can note "Exceptions" and create "Regulations" to LIMIT and/or define the Supreme Court's jurisdiction and code of conduct. Judge made binding-precedent with stare decisis attached forever - should be abolished. Judge made decisions are merely suggestive and NOT binding on any civil or criminal "lawful judgment of his (their) peers"[15] i.e., jury decision.[16]
The founding fathers at the ratification of the constitution, had several more immediate precedents of judicial corruption e.g., the "Abolition of the Star Chamber" (1641), the "Bloody Assizes"[17] (1685) and much, much more. The King never PERSONALLY acted to corrupt the justice of Jury rights established by the Magna Carta (1215). The King merely sent his henchman, the Judges, to affect his power to corrupt the justice of the trial by jury. That is very much like today's political henchman on the Supreme Court, that today deny the Magna Carta, United States Constitutional criminal[18] and civil[19] "jury rights" to affect their corruption. The Founding Fathers knew MUCH better than to create a corruptible lifetime appointed oligarchy, with unregulated jurisdiction and virtually unimpeachable[20] political power.
But patiently the political henchman waited, and as Thomas Jefferson predicted:
"It has long been my opinion, and I have never shrunk from its expression,… that the germ of dissolution of our Federal Government is in the constitution of the Federal Judiciary–an irresponsible body (for impeachment is scarcely a scare-crow), working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction until all shall be usurped from the States and the government be consolidated into one. To this I am opposed." — Thomas Jefferson - Letter to Charles Hammond, 1821.
As we all know you, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., you are at the head of a criminal conspiracy dedicated to the deprivation of constitutional criminal and civil JURY rights. Long ago Chief Justice John Marshal, with a beautiful piece of legal FICTION (Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)), originally instigated the chicanery. Even though, Marshal rarely if ever used the usurped authority.
Now I have been prosecuting you and your ilk, with near constant petitions for 20+ years now (see DGJeep v. United States [Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856] and DOJ report # 265705-BPB). As I would hope you know by now, my case revolves around your assertion of super-duper absolute immunity:
"The issue is and has always been – a flagrantly, infamous, and fraudulent non-exigent, extra-judicial (coram non judice) gravamen:
· a fraud (fraus omnia corrumpit[21]) on the court by an officer of the court (FRCP 60(d)(3))[22]
· again, a fraudulent NOT "facially valid court order"[23] (Stump v. Sparkman,435 U.S. 356-57 (1978) PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003)) -
· that was reckonably[24] issued "in the "clear absence of all jurisdiction," (Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12, 112 S.Ct. 286, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991) (per curiam) PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003)) –
· "beyond debate" (Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011), Mullenix v. Luna 577 U. S. _(2015))
· "sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would have understood that what he is doing violates that right" (Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U. S. 635, 640 (1987), Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011)).[25]
THE GRAVITAS OF THE PERSONAL[26] ISSUE IS BEYOND QUESTION, IT TOOK AWAY PETITIONER'S SON, HOME, CAR AND EVERYTHING HE ONCE HELD DEAR IN THE WORLD. Thus the issue could never be construed as a vexatious[27] nor is the ongoing fight against flagrant injustice "continual Calumniations"[28] nor could a 15 year struggle against injustice be construed as an inconsequential "short ride."[29]
Now we all know that EVERY man alive, in the current Jane Crow Era, is unable to control themselves, drinks to excess and will ALWAYS revert to violence in intimate sexual relations. And thus, WE ALL KNOW that judges, in many cases will, self-deprecatingly and without regard to their own gender, circumvent the statute law, precedent, and constitutional law to erase a man theoretically and financially.
In 1960[30] one in twenty (5%) children grew up without a father in the home. In 2014, 54 years later, the rate of fatherlessness had increased seven-fold to eight in twenty (40%). Now we all know in a MODERN world there is no need for masculinity. Asexual reproduction is just around the corner. All men are rabid dogs and cannot be brought to heel without figurative and financial erasure. I WAS ERASED.
I, for AT LEAST ONE, in this overcrowded world had a GREAT man as my father. He was a chemical engineer. He was professionally prosperous, along with my mother, he fruitfully raised seven kids. He had the patience of a saint. He put us all through private school. Most people never noticed him except for the crowd of kids around him. He never played sports. But he coached and came to every game he could. He worked A LOT. He never spent money on himself, never indulged himself in hobbies, never had a new car until we all started to move out and then it was a Ford Escort Station Wagon. He worked for the same company for 37 years, he retired with a Rolex watch (witch I cherish more than virtually anything), as the Executive Vice President just as the refined food haters were coming too much into prominence. He was a clarion example of what I wanted to be as a person and as a parent. To this point I have failed his memory.
I have not been defeated! I am still at it, even though I carry no weapons. I have been at this for 20 years. I was impoverished, homeless for 11 plus years in my effort. My son was unfortunately forced to take drugs and was largely raised by others from the age of 9. I taught myself some law, I have been to the mountaintop of the Supreme Court EIGHT times (see DGJeep v. United States [Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856] and DOJ report # 265705-BPB). I have been unable to get a license to drive a car for 20+ years also.
I went to the FBI as the preeminent federal agency for the protection of Constitutional Civil Rights. They arrested me (March 2009), held me without bond, without trial, without cause for 411 days in Federal Custody. I was forced to ride on Con Air. I was forced to live with several unsavory characters from MS-13. I was in a prison riot. I completed TWO psychiatric exams. BOTH declared my sanity and competency. Before all charges were dismissed (April 2010)[31] for failure to prosecute.
I still wake up every morning with the patience, fortitude, and wisdom my father left me.
I
BELIEVE IN fatherhood.
I fight on for the rights of my son and all men.
If there is anything further, please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
David G. Jeep
cc: Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice, Sandra Day O'Connor (Retired), Associate Justice , Anthony M. Kennedy, (Retired) Associate Justice , David H. Souter (Retired), Associate Justice, Stephen G. Breyer, (Retired), Associate Justice, Lisa Nesbit c/o Scott S. Harris Supreme Court Clerk, Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski and Willie Geist - Morning Joe - MSNBC Network, Attorney General Merrick Garland, DOJ Civil Rights Division, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Dick Durbin, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
file
[1] 18 U.S.C. § 371—Conspiracy to Defraud the United States
[2] Please see DGJeep v. United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856) and DOJ report # 265705-BPB s the first example.
[3] Constitution of the United States, Clause 2 Supreme Court Jurisdiction
"In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make."
[4] 18 U.S.C. § 371—Conspiracy to Defraud the United States – Any assertion of royalist like absolute immunity i.e., perfection in today's REAL world is a fraud. Everybody, EVERY institution makes mistakes and to assert perfection is a FRAUD. Mistakes are going to happen and denying their existence does not improve outcomes.
[5] Title Criminal 18, U.S.C, § 241 & 242, and Title Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 & 1985 – I mean look at my case, CLEARLY, I was denied due process of law. But because it was approved by a newly christened family commissioner i.e., a judicial officer it was awarded "absolute immunity" and without a shibboleth constitutional civil rights have been ignored for 20 years.
[6] NOTE - There will be many, many books written about the corruption of Trump's Majority on the Supreme Court and its TAINT of FRAUD from the 2016 Russian Collusion. We the People will not always be so blinded by William Barr's, Mitch McConnel's and Kevin McCarthy's obsequiousness to the criminal FRAUD in the 2016 election Russian Collusion. "Fraus omnia corrumpit" ("fraud corrupts all)."
[7] Abortion, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, LGBQT Rights and "Free Speech" 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, and Student Loan Forgiveness, Biden v. Nebraska
[8] Super-duper absolute immunity has to be NOT ONLY be "beyond reasonable doubt" but "beyond all debate" (Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U. S. 731, 741 (2011), Mullenix v. Luna 577 U. S. _(2015))
[9] Title Criminal 18, U.S.C, § 241 & 242, and Title Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 & 1985
[10] "Fraus omnia corrumpit" ("fraud corrupts all)." A principle according to which the discovery of fraud invalidates all aspects of a judicial decision or arbitral award.... ...
[11] Until "fraud" is considered by the court it does not exist e.g., it cannot be proven or disproven. Be assured the "common sense" will always prevail. "You can fool all the people some of the time and some of the all the time. BUT you can not fool all the people all the time."
[12] "Fraus omnia corrumpit" ("fraud corrupts all)." A principle according to which the discovery of fraud invalidates all aspects of a judicial decision or arbitral award.... ...
[13] 18 U.S. Code § 241 – Criminal Conspiracy against rights "If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same"
[14] Jurisdiction the official power to make legal decisions and judgments, e.g., "federal courts had no jurisdiction over the issue", the extent of the power to make legal decisions and judgments.
[15] Magna Carta Article 39
[16] Now you are going to hear those make a case that without the binding judicial authority of precedent I will be able to frivolously sue, ANYBODY, for $1,000,000,000 for looking at me funny. I assert that common sense will prevail, and juries will VERY seldom be bothered to award punitive court costs as damages in frivolous cases.
[17] Bloody Assizes was the name given to the mass trials of Monmouth's rebels in 1685, presided over by Jeffreys and four other judges. Nearly all the 1,300 prisoners were undoubtedly guilty of treason, for which the sentence was death by hanging, disembowelling, and quartering.
[18] Article III Section 2 third paragraph "The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment; shall be by Jury"
[19] VII Amendment "In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law."
[20] As an individual who's rights are denied, sans the VII Amendment, my only remedy is impeachment? The political requirements (see Trump's TWO well PROVEN impeachments) for impeachment makes it untenable for any individual remedy for the deprivation of Constitutional Rights. DO NOT MAKE ME LAUGH. I was thrown in jail for 411 days for discussing otherwise (MOED Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP).
[21] Fraus omnia corrumpit - "fraud corrupts all." - a principle according to which the discovery of fraud invalidates all aspects of a judicial decision or arbitral award.
[22] Rule 60(d)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - "set aside a judgment for fraud on the court."
[23] The assertion of a misdemeanor traffic violation does not provide REASONABLE probable cause for an ex parte order of protection. Clearly based on the original SERVED handwritten petition dated 11-03-03, there was a complete absence of jurisdiction for the stated charge.
[24] If reason (reckonabilty) does not limit jurisdiction with probable cause, nothing can."reckonability" is a needful characteristic of any law worthy of the name." Antonin Scalia: The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules, 56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175, 1175-81 (1989)
[25] "To this day, I am haunted by the vivid memory of the confirming shrug from the Police Officer when I questioned it as served on November 3, 2003. I am further haunted by the memory of the same confirming shrug when Commissioner Jones first saw the absurdity of the court order on the bench November 20, 2003 as my attorney then highlighted as he repeated his prior objections." Lisa Nesbit c/o OFFICE OF THE CLERK Thursday, June 15, 2017, 10:23:36 AM
[26] While the petitioner asserts this is not necessarily an isolated Jane Crow issue, it is a uniquely flagrant "first impression" and PERSONAL for the petitioner. Per McCabe v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co., 235 U.S. 151 (1914) " The essence of the constitutional right to equal protection of the law is that it is a personal one, and does not depend upon the number of persons affected, and any individual who is denied by a common carrier, under authority of the state, a facility or convenience which is furnished to another under substantially the same circumstances may properly complain that his constitutional privilege has been invaded. Congressman Beatty of Ohio claimed that it was the duty of Congress to listen to the appeals of those who, "by reason of popular sentiment or secret organizations or prejudiced juries or bribed judges, [cannot] obtain the rights and privileges due an American citizen. . . .""
[27] Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1871), Page 80 U. S. 348 and 349
[28] Floyd and Barker. (1607) Easter Term, 5 James I - In the Court of Star Chamber. - First Published in the Reports, volume 12, page 23.
[29] Ida B. Well v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad - Tennessee Supreme Court, which reversed the lower court's ruling in 1887. It concluded, "We think it is evident that the purpose of the defendant in error was to harass with a view to this suit, and that her persistence was not in good faith to obtain a comfortable seat for the short ride."[Southwestern Reporter, Volume 4, May 16–August 1, 1887.
[30] The Fracking Boom, a Baby Boom, and the Retreat From Marriage" - Freakonomics – NPR - July 5, 2017, "Women just aren't that into the 'marriageable male' anymore, economists say" Washington Post - By Danielle Paquette - May 16, 2017, "Male Earnings, Marriageable Men, and Nonmarital Fertility: Evidence from the Fracking Boom" Melissa S. Kearney & Riley Wilson - May 2017,
[31] Charges are Dismissed without Prejudice for failure to comply with the Speedy Trial Act (Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP).
"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')
David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)
www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com
Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message
David G. Jeep
1531 Pine St Apt #403
St. Louis, MO 63103-2547
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets
No comments:
Post a Comment