"The Earth and everything that's in it": DGJeep[1] v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

Friday, December 29, 2023

DGJeep[1] v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543-0001

Re: DGJeep[1] v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

Dear People,

I am suing the Supreme Court of the United States for $666,740,000.00[2] via the VII Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

I am STILL sane[3] even though my son, my friends, my family may have asserted otherwise during this 20+ year struggle. Just so we are all “sane” and on the same terra firma, I want you to know that neither fraud or the deprivation of constitutional rights can be limited by any financial / statute of limitation.

I have got a 20 yr., ever increasing, $666,740,000.00 +/- problem. If you have any questions as to the viability or specifics of my claims for the deprivation of constitutional rights [4] via fraud on the court by officers of the court,[5] please review the prior, timely, repeatedly, submitted Petitions for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856. You have them, they are out there in the “cloud.”

But your problem is bigger. The Supreme Court of the United States as the uncontested Judicial Authority of the Article III Justice department has created judge-made-law that supports and sustains, a fascist financially unfair justice system.[6] I fully admit, I could have avoided this entire problem if I had paid-off[7] the system and gotten my traffic ticket “FIXED” 20+ years ago. I refused! If you have cash, under Supreme Court precedent - as Donald J. Trump does - you can avoid traffic law, criminal law, civil law, tax law, matrimonial law and VII Amendment constitutional law in State and Federal Article III Courts.

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.”

― Winston S. Churchill

If there is anything further, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

enclosure

cc: Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice, Anthony M. Kennedy, (Retired) Associate Justice , David H. Souter (Retired), Associate Justice, Stephen G. Breyer, (Retired), Associate Justice, Lisa Nesbit c/o Scott S. Harris Supreme Court Clerk, Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski and Willie Geist - Morning Joe - MSNBC Network, Attorney General Merrick Garland, DOJ Civil Rights Division

www.DGJeep.com, file

[1] It should be noted that my middle-class family roots had the Jeep name centuries in advance of the Willys Motor Co creation of their General Purpose (GP) for the U.S. Army. My paternal grandfather was born 21 NOV 1888 • my father fought in WWII and drove / rode a GP.

[2] See the enclosed spread sheet originating Tuesday June 14, 2011 12:00 AM and calculated to THE second Thursday December 21 2023 08:21 AM. Note: as a comparable, Donald J. Trump has spent a comparable amount in sustaining his fascist financial interest in the deprivation of Constitutional Rights.

[3] I have Article III mandated certifications of my sanity.

[4] Title Criminal 18, U.S.C, § 242, and Title Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983

[5] Federal Rules of Civil Procedures Rule 56 (d) (2) Establishing Liability

[6] Just think where we would be if Ida B. Wells had been able to sustain her $500 judgement for damages, for getting FORCIBLY REMOVED from a train instead of the judge-made-law of "We think it is evident that the purpose of the defendant in error was to harass with a view to this suit, and that her persistence was not in good faith to obtain a comfortable seat for the short ride (Chesapeake, O. & S. R. Co. v. Wells, 1887, p. 5.)."

[7] I had a proposal form an attorney of $5,000 to handle it.