Friday, December 20, 2013

Refusal of CONSENT Judge Selection, Jeep v. Government of the United States, et al No. 4:13-cv-02490-TIA

Clerk of Court - James G. Woodward
St. Louis - Eastern Division
Thomas F. Eagleton Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Suite 3.300
St. Louis, MO 63102-1123

Re:      Refusal of CONSENT Judge Selection, Jeep v. Government of the United States, et al No. 4:13-cv-02490-TIA

Dear People,
I am making a pro se attempt[1] at an official refusal of consent based on “Rule 40 - 2.08. Assignments of Actions and Matters., (A) Assignment of Civil Actions.”

I hereby REFUSE to consent to “a magistrate judge.”

I am making an official request for an Article III “district judge.”

Again just to be clear, I do no concede to the assignment of a magistrate judge to the matter Jeep v. Government of the United States, et al No. 4:13-cv-02490.

If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.
“Time is of the essence”




David G. Jeep

cc:  My Blog - Friday, December 27, 2013, 1:11:34 PM





[1] acknowledging pro-se 28 U.S.C. § 2111. Harmless error;  that does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.
Post a Comment