Friday, December 27, 2013

Refusal of CONSENT Judge Selection, Jeep v. Government of the United States, et al No. 4:13-cv-02490-CAS

Clerk of Court - James G. Woodward
St. Louis - Eastern Division
Thomas F. Eagleton Courthouse
111 South 10th Street, Suite 3.300
St. Louis, MO 63102-1123

Re:      Refusal of CONSENT Judge Selection, Jeep v. Government of the United States, et al No. 4:13-cv-02490-CAS

Dear People,

I am in receipt of your order dated 12-20-13 post marked 12-23-13.  I am making a pro se attempt[1] at an official refusal of consent based on the selected judge being a PRIOR and current listed respondent to the petition.  Please see page 2 of 20 Lines 20 and 21 of the filed complaint dated 12-12-13.

Again just to be clear, I do no concede to the assignment of a listed respondent to the petition to the matter Jeep v. Government of the United States, et al No. 4:13-cv-02490.

If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.


“Time is of the essence”




David G. Jeep

cc:  My Blog - Friday, December 27, 2013, 1:16:24 PM





[1] acknowledging pro-se 28 U.S.C. § 2111. Harmless error;  that does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.