Monday, August 4, 2014

Official SERVICE - Petition for Writ of Certiorari 14-5551 in the Supreme Court of the United States PDF File attached

Mailed First-Class Mail® Monday, August 04, 2014

Donald B. Verrilli Jr. Solicitor General
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001

 (202) 514-2217


 Re: Official SERVICE - Petition for Writ of Certiorari 14-5551 in the Supreme Court of the United States - A repeated constitutionally and lawfully un-abridge-able petition for Writ of Certiorari regarding the facially IN-valid court order[1] in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals cases 07-2614, 08-1823, 10-1947, 11-2425, 12-2435, 13-2200 and 14-1470 David Jeep v. Government of United States that "a four-year-old[2]" could understand

Dear Mr. Verrilli,

In that, I would hope YOU and your boss are well aware, this is my 5th Petition for Writ of Certiorari[3] to the Supreme Court of the United States to establish Justice in the face of "sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidly." [4]

I stress, as always, "time is of the essence."  I was incarcerated for 411 days[5] and have been homeless for 6.70 years in this 11.17 year effort. [6]  

"How[7] did strict scrutiny[8] for inalienable reckonable[9] rights[10] ever result[11] in anything less than STRICT LIABILITY?[12]"

We have gone PAST Thomas Jefferson's assertions of destruction to render ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION[13] of inalienable rights under color of law:

"The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body - working like gravity by night and day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing it's noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated." --Thomas Jefferson[14]

To hear the Supreme Court tell us, via their unrestricted absolutely immune power, We the People, all evidence to the contrary, "intended sub silentio"[15] to traded the "King[16] can do no WRONG" for the ABSOLUTELY IMMUNE actions of the "malicious or corrupt" judges (Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)),[17] the "malicious or dishonest" prosecutor Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976), [18] the "knowingly false testimony by police officers" (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)),[19] corrupt, malicious, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid[20] actions[21] of federal, state, local, and regional legislators (Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997) Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367, 372, 372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138)[22] and the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid[23] actions of "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who (spouses) were integral parts of the judicial process" (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)) [24] acting under color of law to render ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION[25] of inalienable rights under color of law.

In this 11.17 year effort, 411 days[26] incarcerated, 6.70 years homeless, and 5 trips[27] to the Supreme Court of the United States I have left no proverbial or real life "stone unturned."  Leave this petition undefended and the CORRUPTION leaves only one means to establish Justice in a country supposedly based on reasonable "due process of law."

If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing and enclosed is true and correct.  


Thank you in advance.
"Time is of the essence"

David G. Jeep

enclosure
a.     Supreme Court Order DOCKETED August 1, 2014
b.     "A humble pro se EMERGENCY PETITION for a WRIT OF CERTIORARI, 11.17 years of deprivation, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES" (58 pages) a recreated electronic copy in that the petitioner's Original Copy was electronically lost.

cc:  My Blog - Monday, August 04, 2014, 10:54:38 AM



[1] The assertion of a misdemeanor traffic violation does not provide probable cause for an ex parte restraining order.  Clearly based on the original SERVED handwritten petition dated 11-03-03 as provided here, there was a complete absence of jurisdiction for the stated charge.  "Consequently, it (the judge's order) can be facially invalid only if it was issued in the "clear absence of all jurisdiction." Stump v. Sparkman,435 U.S. 349, 356-57, 98 S.Ct. 1099, 55 L.Ed.2d 331 (1978) (citation omitted)." Id." PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003). 
[2] Attorney Joe Miller (Denzel Washington REPEATED ASSERTION in "Philadelphia"): "Now, explain it to me like I'm a four-year-old"
[3] Docketed and denied Petitions for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-5193 & 13-7030 and NOW 14-5551
[4] "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." Martin Luther King "Strength to Love" 1963
[5] U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP, Habeas Cases 4:09-CV-831 CAS, 4:09-MJ-1052 TIA, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit 09-2848  David Jeep  vs.  United States
[6] Start Saturday May 17, 2003 01:00 AM as of Tuesday July 15 2014 12:58 PM
[7] "We have long enough suffered under the base prostitution of law to party passions in one judge, and the imbecility of another. In the hands of one the law is nothing more than an ambiguous text, to be explained by his sophistry into any meaning which may subserve his personal malice." (The Letters of Thomas Jefferson: 1743-1826 SCHOOLS AND "LITTLE REPUBLICS" To John Tyler Monticello, May 26, 1810)
[8] United States v. Carolene Products (1938), Korematsu v. United States (1944), and Adarand Constructors v. Peña, 515 U.S. 200 (1995)
[9] "reckonability" is a needful characteristic of any law worthy of the name."  Antonin Scalia: The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules,  56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175, 1175-81 (1989)
[10] Due Process of Law under the 5th and 14th amendments
[11] Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 410 (1971) In a civil issue "the "exclusionary rule" is simply irrelevant…, it is damages or nothing."
[12] "As our precedent makes clear, proving that a municipality itself actually caused a constitutional violation by failing to train the offending employee presents "difficult problems of proof," and we must adhere to a "stringent standard of fault," lest municipal liability under §1983 collapse into respondeat superior.12 Bryan County, 520 U. S., at 406, 410; see Canton, 489 U. S., at 391–392." Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson, Certiorari to the Supreme Court, No. 09–571. Argued October 6, 2010—Decided March 29, 2011
"The essence of the constitutional right to equal protection of the law is that it is a personal one, and does not depend upon the number of persons affected, and any individual who is denied by a common carrier, under authority of the state, a facility or convenience which is furnished to another under substantially the same circumstances may properly complain that his constitutional privilege has been invaded." McCabe v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co., 235 U.S. 151 (1914)
[13] "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it." Lord Acton in a letter he wrote to scholar and ecclesiastic Mandell Creighton, dated April 1887.
[14] As quoted into the Congressional Record Senate Vol. 152, Pt. 1 page 80-81, Mr. Santorum and Bergh, 15:331. 1821.
[15]  "To assume that Congress, which had enacted a criminal sanction directed against state judicial officials, [Footnote 2/26] intended sub silentio to exempt those same officials from the civil counterpart approaches the incredible. [Footnote 2/27]"  Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 363 (1983)  I would assert it a fantastic or delusional scenario!!!!!
[16] Judges e.g., "the Law will not suppose any unindifferent, when he is sworn to serve the King"
[17] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Judicial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY is based on a skewed reading, overlooking the noted exception that absolute ANYTHING creates, of Lord Coke, Floyd and Barker (1607) ruling from an acknowledged CORRUPT court, the Star Chamber.
[18] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976) Prosecutorial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
[20] "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." Martin Luther King "Strength to Love" 1963
[21] The recent Government Shut Down comes to mind, but the Black Robed Royalist Article III Supreme Court had already handed our legislators absolute immunity for their legislative actions, Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997).  --- See also David Gerard Jeep Appellant v. The Tea Party/GOP/Republicans, et al. Appellees U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis Case #: 13CV2089-DDN, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit No: 14-1344
[22] Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997) Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367, 372, 372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138
[23] Incompetence is the most insidious and it is covered up by the gratuitous grants of dishonesty, malice and corruption.  Martin Luther King said it better, "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity" (MLK Jr., Strength to Love, 1963). 
As regards state Prosecutors, "States can discipline federal prosecutors, rarely do" 12/08/2010 USAToday by Brad Heath & Kevin McCoy ("Federal prosecutors series").  The "OPR is a black hole. Stuff goes in, nothing comes out," said Jim Lavine, the president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. "The public, the defense attorneys and the judiciary have lost respect for the government's ability to police themselves."
As regards law enforcement "Convicted defendants left uninformed of forensic flaws found by Justice Dept." By Spencer S. Hsu, The Washington Post published: April 16, 2012, The Washington Post reported on cases that demonstrate problems of COMPETENCY in forensic analysis that have been known for nearly 40 years by the Justice Department.
[24] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983) ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"
[25] "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it." Lord Acton in a letter he wrote to scholar and ecclesiastic Mandell Creighton, dated April 1887.
[26] U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP, Habeas Cases 4:09-CV-831 CAS, 4:09-MJ-1052 TIA, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit 09-2848  David Jeep  vs.  United States
[27] Docketed and denied Petitions for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-5193 & 13-7030 and NOW 14-5551 
To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process
"Agere sequitur esse"
"Time is  of the essence"
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
My E-mail addresses are David.G.Jeep@GMail.com orDGJeep01@yahoo.com

(314) 514-5228

David G. Jeep
GENERAL DELIVERY
Saint Louis , MO 63155-9999