Tuesday, August 5, 2014

We are now looking at whether you and the courts are in THE POSSESSION OF MORAL AGENCY?

President Barack Hussein Obama                    Ruth Bader Ginsburg
The White House                                             Supreme Court of the United States
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.                    One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20500-0001                             Washington, DC 20543-0001

Re: Petition for Writ of Certiorari 14-5551 David Jeep v. Government of United States - that "a four-year-old[1]" could understand
 Dear People,

 "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity."
Martin Luther King "Strength to Love" 1963[2]

As you may or may not know, I have written you both SEVERAL TIMES!!!  I was served a NOT "facially valid court order."[3]  Now both of you, The Supreme Court en banc, the Federal Court Eastern District of Missouri and 8th Circuit Court are all asserting "sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." [4]

In the Jane Crow era we have thus gone beyond whether men or woman are in THE POSSESSION OF greater MORAL AGENCY.[5]  We are now looking at whether you and the courts are in THE POSSESSION OF MORAL AGENCY?  Or are you and they too sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid"[6] "to establish justice" in the face of nearly 150 years of a criminally[7] fraudulent[8] self-serving Black Robed Royalist Judiciary's unconstitutional fiat legislation.[9]

It has been 146 years since the unconstitutional Black Robed Royalist Judiciary in Randall v. Brigham, 74 U.S. 536 (1868) reached back in time to a discredited[10] court, Star Chamber, to create "absolute immunity" to render "absolute power" for the institutionalization of Jim Crow, now Jane Crow, inequality over the expressed constitutional congressional "ex industria, power to enforce the Thirteenth (Fourteenth and Fifteenth) Amendment by appropriate legislation"[11] - MANDATES in the Civil rights Act of 1866,[12] Civil rights Act of 1871[13] and the Civil rights Act of 1875.[14] 

I have been impoverished by my 11.17 years[15] effort, I have been homeless for over 6.7[16] years, I have been through the Federal District and Circuit courts 9 times and to the Supreme Court of the United States 5 times.  I was arrested by FBI and spent 411 days in jail before the charges were dismissed for failure to prosecute.  While in jail, I submitted to TWO psychiatric exams - both confirming my SANITY and my COMPETENCY!!!!  I doubt the all powerful absolutely immune Judiciary could, en masse, say the same.

I stress, as always, "time is of the essence."  I was, I say again, incarcerated for 411 days[17] and have been homeless for 6.70 years in this 11.17 year effort. [18] 


"How[19] did strict scrutiny[20] for inalienable reckonable[21] rights[22] ever result[23] in anything less than STRICT LIABILITY?[24]"


We have gone PAST Thomas Jefferson's assertions of destruction:

"The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body - working like gravity by night and day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing it's noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated." --Thomas Jefferson[25]

to render ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION[26] of inalienable rights under color of law.


To hear the Supreme Court tell us, via their unrestricted absolutely immune, fraud based, power, We the People, all evidence to the contrary, "intended sub silentio"[27] to traded the "King[28] can do no WRONG" for the ABSOLUTELY IMMUNE actions of the "malicious or corrupt" judges (Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)),[29] the "malicious or dishonest" prosecutor Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976), [30] the "knowingly false testimony by police officers" (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)),[31] corrupt, malicious, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid[32] actions[33] of federal, state, local, and regional legislators (Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997) Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367, 372, 372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138)[34] and the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid[35] actions of "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who (spouses) were integral parts of the judicial process" (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)) [36] acting under color of law to render ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION[37] of inalienable rights under color of law.

In this 11.17 year effort, 411 days[38] incarcerated, 6.70 years homeless, and 5 trips to the Supreme Court of the United States I have left no proverbial or real life "stone unturned."  Leave this petition undefended and the CORRUPTION leaves only one means to establish Justice in a country supposedly based on reasonable "due process of law."

If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
 Thank you in advance.
"Time is of the essence" 
  David G. Jeep

cc:  My Blog - Tuesday, August 05, 2014, 1:30:27 PM



[1] Attorney Joe Miller (Denzel Washington REPEATED ASSERTION in "Philadelphia"): "Now, explain it to me like I'm a four-year-old"
[2] Martin Luther King "Strength to Love" 1963
[3] The assertion of a misdemeanor traffic violation does not provide probable cause for an ex parte restraining order.  Clearly based on the original SERVED handwritten petition dated 11-03-03 as provided with the petition, there was a complete absence of jurisdiction for the stated charge.  "Consequently, it (the judge's order) can be facially invalid only if it was issued in the "clear absence of all jurisdiction." Stump v. Sparkman,435 U.S. 349, 356-57, 98 S.Ct. 1099, 55 L.Ed.2d 331 (1978) (citation omitted)." Id." PENN v. U.S. 335 F.3d 790 (2003). 
[4] Martin Luther King "Strength to Love" 1963
[5] "Do the four of you, or do I, have more confidence in what feminism once valuably asserted – the fact that women are the equals of men in the possession of moral agency?"  George F. will's response to Senators Blumenthal, Feinstein, Baldwin and Casey, June 13, 2014.  Re: "Colleges mad with political correctness over campus rapes" By George F. Will, New York Post, June 7, 2014 – "Colleges become the victims of progressivism" By George F. Will, Washington Post, Published: June 6
[6] Martin Luther King "Strength to Love" 1963
[7] This is criminal not only because of the Criminal Deprivation of rights (18 U.S.C. § 241 & 242), but also the CLEAR FRAUD in the face of the mens rea and actus reus, of 150 years of self-servingly asseted "sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." 
[8] Fraus omnia corrumpit "Fraud corrupts all." A principle according to which the discovery of fraud invalidates all aspects of a judicial decision
[9] As examples of the self-serving Black Robed Royalist Judiciary's unconstitutional fiat legislation, that has corrupted We the People's unalienable rights under color of law, I submit, Randall v. Brigham, 74 U.S. 7 (1868) the origin of judicial criminal sophisticated "absolute immunity," Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335 (1872) origin of sophisticated Judicial civil "absolute immunity," Blyew v. United States, 80 U.S. 581 (1871) sophisticated "absolute immunity" for racially motivate mass murder, United States v. Reese, 92 U.S. 214 (1875) sophisticated deprivation of the 15th Amendment's Voting Rights protection with the subterfuges of poll taxes, literacy tests, and grandfather clauses, United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875) sophisticated "absolute immunity" for racially motivated massacre (Colfax Riot/pogrom), United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629 (1883) sophisticated "absolute immunity" for the state's sanctioned kidnapping, assault and murder without regard to the 14th Amendment's security, Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883) creating sophisticated racial segregation and the ongoing Jim Crow discrimination over the "necessary and proper" "Act to protect all citizens in their civil and legal rights." 18 Stat. 335, enacted March 1, 1875, Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896) separate and UNEQUAL, clarifying sophisticated segregation over the necessary and proper "Act to protect all citizens in their civil and legal rights." 18 Stat. 335, enacted March 1, 1875, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967) reaffirmed Judicial sophisticated "absolute immunity," Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 409 (1976) prosecutorial sophisticated "absolute immunity," Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978) sophisticated "absolute immunity" for forced sterilization, and Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) sophisticated "absolute immunity" for "knowingly false testimony by police officers," and "all persons that were integral in the Judicial Process."   If that is not ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's intent to establish justice, I cannot imagine what is.
[10] The star chamber was abolished for cause, abuse of said absolute immunity with the Act of Parliament "Abolition of the Star Chamber" (July 5, 1641)
[11] MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissenting. Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 32 (1883)
[12] Now Codified into US Code as Criminal 18 U.S.C. § 241 & 242
[13] Now Codified into US Code as Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985
[14] Now Codified into US Code as The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88–352, 78 Stat. 241, enacted July 2, 1964)
[15] Start Saturday May 17, 2003 01:00 AM as of Tuesday July 15 2014 12:58 PM
[16] Start Monday November 05, 2007 10:00 AM of Tuesday July 15 2014 12:58 PM
[17] U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP, Habeas Cases 4:09-CV-831 CAS, 4:09-MJ-1052 TIA, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit 09-2848  David Jeep  vs.  United States
[18] Start Saturday May 17, 2003 01:00 AM as of Tuesday July 15 2014 12:58 PM
[19] "We have long enough suffered under the base prostitution of law to party passions in one judge, and the imbecility of another. In the hands of one the law is nothing more than an ambiguous text, to be explained by his sophistry into any meaning which may subserve his personal malice." (The Letters of Thomas Jefferson: 1743-1826 SCHOOLS AND "LITTLE REPUBLICS" To John Tyler Monticello, May 26, 1810)
[20] United States v. Carolene Products (1938), Korematsu v. United States (1944), and Adarand Constructors v. Peña, 515 U.S. 200 (1995)
[21] "reckonability" is a needful characteristic of any law worthy of the name."  Antonin Scalia: The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules,  56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175, 1175-81 (1989)
[22] Due Process of Law under the 5th and 14th amendments
[23] Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 410 (1971) In a civil issue "the "exclusionary rule" is simply irrelevant…, it is damages or nothing."
[24] "As our precedent makes clear, proving that a municipality itself actually caused a constitutional violation by failing to train the offending employee presents "difficult problems of proof," and we must adhere to a "stringent standard of fault," lest municipal liability under §1983 collapse into respondeat superior.12 Bryan County, 520 U. S., at 406, 410; see Canton, 489 U. S., at 391–392." Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson, Certiorari to the Supreme Court, No. 09–571. Argued October 6, 2010—Decided March 29, 2011 - What happened to - "The essence of the constitutional right to equal protection of the law is that it is a personal one, and does not depend upon the number of persons affected, and any individual who is denied by a common carrier, under authority of the state, a facility or convenience which is furnished to another under substantially the same circumstances may properly complain that his constitutional privilege has been invaded." McCabe v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co., 235 U.S. 151 (1914)
[25] As quoted into the Congressional Record Senate Vol. 152, Pt. 1 page 80-81, Mr. Santorum and Bergh, 15:331. 1821.
[26] "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it." Lord Acton in a letter he wrote to scholar and ecclesiastic Mandell Creighton, dated April 1887.
[27]  "To assume that Congress, which had enacted a criminal sanction directed against state judicial officials, [Footnote 2/26] intended sub silentio to exempt those same officials from the civil counterpart approaches the incredible. [Footnote 2/27]"  Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 363 (1983)  I would assert it a fantastic or delusional scenario!!!!!
[28] Judges e.g., "the Law will not suppose any unindifferent, when he is sworn to serve the King"
[29] Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Judicial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY is based on a skewed reading, overlooking the noted exception that absolute ANYTHING creates, of Lord Coke, Floyd and Barker (1607) ruling from an acknowledged CORRUPT court, the Star Chamber.
[30] Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976) Prosecutorial ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY
[32] "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." Martin Luther King "Strength to Love" 1963
[33] The recent Government Shut Down comes to mind, but the Black Robed Royalist Article III Supreme Court had already handed our legislators absolute immunity for their legislative actions, Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997).  --- See also David Gerard Jeep Appellant v. The Tea Party/GOP/Republicans, et al. Appellees U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis Case #: 13CV2089-DDN, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit No: 14-1344
[34] Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997) Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367, 372, 372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138
[35] Incompetence is the most insidious and it is covered up by the gratuitous grants of dishonesty, malice and corruption.  Martin Luther King said it better, "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity" (MLK Jr., Strength to Love, 1963). 
As regards state Prosecutors, "States can discipline federal prosecutors, rarely do" 12/08/2010 USAToday by Brad Heath & Kevin McCoy ("Federal prosecutors series").  The "OPR is a black hole. Stuff goes in, nothing comes out," said Jim Lavine, the president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. "The public, the defense attorneys and the judiciary have lost respect for the government's ability to police themselves."
As regards law enforcement "Convicted defendants left uninformed of forensic flaws found by Justice Dept." By Spencer S. Hsu, The Washington Post published: April 16, 2012, The Washington Post reported on cases that demonstrate problems of COMPETENCY in forensic analysis that have been known for nearly 40 years by the Justice Department.
[36] Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983) ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"
[37] "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it." Lord Acton in a letter he wrote to scholar and ecclesiastic Mandell Creighton, dated April 1887.
[38] U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP, Habeas Cases 4:09-CV-831 CAS, 4:09-MJ-1052 TIA, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit 09-2848  David Jeep  vs.  United States
--
Thanks in advance,
To Kill a Mocking Bird, The Denial of Due Process
"Agere sequitur esse"
"Time is  of the essence"
David G. Jeep
http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/
My E-mail addresses are David.G.Jeep@GMail.com orDGJeep01@yahoo.com

(314) 514-5228

David G. Jeep
GENERAL DELIVERY
Saint Louis , MO 63155-9999