Tuesday, October 28, 2025 - 5:57:48 PM
Pat, I am OK. You are OK.
The TOO often overlooked last clause of the First Amendment[1]
The LAST clause of the First Amendment[2] is really THE most important but too often overlooked:
Congress shall make no law respecting… abridging the… right of the people… to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The TOO often overlooked last clause of the First Amendment[1]
The LAST clause of the First Amendment[2] is really THE most important but too
often overlooked:
Congress shall make no
law respecting… abridging the… right of the people… to petition the Government
for a redress of grievances.
You see, the FOUNDING Fathers
lived under a King’s immunity and seen too many civil wars. They sought a way to avoid governmental conflict
with the well-established[3] “due process of law” and local juries civilly[4] and criminally[5].
But alas the Founding Fathers never saw UNCONSTITUTIONAL judge-made-law coming, except for Thomas Jefferson:
"I know no safe
depository of the ultimate powers of the society, but the people
themselves (think “Voting,” “due process of law” & “juries”):
and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their controul with a
wholsome discretion, the remedy is, not to take it from them, but to inform
their discretion by education. this is the true corrective of abuses of
constitutional power." (Thomas Jefferson 9/28/1820, in
writing to Mr. JARVIS, from Monticello - bolding/underlining/parentheticals) added)
Unconstitutional, unrepresentative, undemocratic judge-made-law’s
ubiquitous[6] grant of “absolute immunity” has grown beyond
anything the Founder’s had feared about the King’s sovereign immunity.
The Founding Fathers had
given us The Constitution for the United States - Article I, II, and Schoolhouse
Rock’s[7] “I’m Just a Bill[8]” clearly define how to make law.
Show me where in the amended Constitution for the United States
“judge-made-law” is called for or authorized[9]?
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view
I have been impoverished for 22
years, I have been through the State Courts and the Federal District, Federal
Circuit and supreme[10] Court EIGHT TIMES (see DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States
(Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551,
14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856 https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets _
We fought a Civil War,
invested 600,000 lives to free the slaves and live up to the preamble to the
Declaration of Independence’s assertion:
“We hold these truths to
be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and
the pursuit of Happiness.”
The laws of England had freed the slaves prior to
our revolution. “If a man sets foot on English Soil then he is free.”
Lord Henley 1763 (Shanley v Harvey [1763] 2 Eden
126) in which the then Lord Chancellor, Lord Henley held in obiter remarks
that as soon as a person set foot on English soil, they become free and may
bring an action against their former master for ill-treatment.
In 1772, Somerset v Stewart, established that a slave who set foot on English
soil could not be forcibly removed from the country.
The first consequential
attempt at judge-made-law in the United States was summarily negated by
President Andrew Jackson in Chief Justice John Marshall’s Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. 515 (1832) - "John
Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it". .
The utter abhorrence of
Jackson’s “Trail of Tears” gave unconstitutional and immoral authority to Chief
Justice Roger Taney’s ruling 10 years later in Prigg v. Pennsylvania, 41 U.S. (16 Pet.) 539 (1842), affirming slaveholders'[11] right to reclaim escaped slaves across state
lines. And then in Ableman v. Booth, 62 U.S. 506 (1858) the Court
upheld the federal Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 and overturned a Wisconsin
Supreme Court decision that had declared it unconstitutional. The Supreme Court ruled that the Fugitive
Slave Act of 1850 was constitutional and that the federal government's laws,
including the Fugitive Slave Act, superseded state laws.
Now, the jaundice
history, that too many have been sold, asserts that Civil War was about “States
Rights” and not about slavery. The
Civil War was about judge-made-law and NOTHING else.
Chief Justice Roger
Taney’s judge-made-law first in Prigg (1842) and Ableman
(1859) that allowed the Southern States to invade the North States to recapture
fugitive slaves. And then Chief Justice
Roger Taney’s crème de la crème judge-made-law in Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856) saying that:
“They (Negroes) had for more than a century before been regarded as
beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white
race either in social or political relations, and so far inferior that they had
no rights which the white man was bound to respect, and that the negro might
justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and
sold, and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic whenever a
profit could be made by it.(Page
60 U. S. 407)”
When
Chief Justice Roger Taney’s crème de la crème judge-made-law said that
he USURPED the Northern States’ and the new territory’s “state’s rights” to be
free of slavery!
Judge-made-law
started the Civil War, Judge-made-law
cost this country 600,000 with the Civil War. Judge-made-law just after the Civil
War made themselves ROYAL and ABSOLUTELY IMMUNE from the law in Judge-made-law
has since the Civil War, FORCED the United States into 150 of ongoing racial
inequality over the timely objection ot Justice John Harlan in Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 552 (1896)
“For
the first nearly 100 years, the last clause of the First Amendment[12] held, that preceded Randall and
Bradley (1776-1868) there was neither need nor questions regarding Judicial
Immunity and then TWO despotic precedents within 5 years:
o Randall v. Brigham, 74 U. S. 536 (decided April 15, 1869)[13] in response to the criminal
liability in The Civil Rights Act of 1866[14] passed in to law April 9, 1866
and then..
o Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (decided April 8, 1872)
[15] in response to civil liability in
the Civil Rights Act of 1871[16] passed into law April 20, 1871 are the origins of
unconstitutional “immunity” in the American Justice
system.
There is no
Constitutional premise for immunity from the Constitution, or the laws derived
from it. In fact immunity from the
constitution is antithetical to the premise of a constitution’s raison
d'etre.
Judicial
Immunity has since spawned reconfirmation of immunity from liability for damages for his judicial acts, see”
o “These cases present issues involving the liability of
local police officers and judges under § 1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 17
Stat. 13, now 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Petitioners” Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 548 (1967)
· “Accordingly, this Court held in Tenney v.
Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367 (1951), that the immunity of legislators for
acts within the legislative role was not abolished. The immunity of judges for
acts within the judicial role is equally well established” Page 386 U. S.
554
o "state prosecuting attorney is absolutely immune
from a civil suit for damages under § 1983 for alleged deprivations of the
accused's constitutional rights" see Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976),
o gives immunity to police officers and their informants
"for giving perjured testimony at the defendant's criminal trial," Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983)
o Briscoe then goes further with “absolute immunity…
for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the
judicial process”[5]
for the “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws” see Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) @ Page 460 U. S. 335.
You
wonder why “We the People” imprison ourselves at 4 times the rate of the of the
MORE CIVILIZED World.
“We the People” of the United States
have no enforceable Constitutional rights.
THIS is in direct contradiction to the 1st and 7th
Amendments in the original amended 1791 version and the Enforcement Acts
authorized by the 13th, 14th and 15th
Amendments and passed into law post-Civil War.
This does not even
mention the immunity and the Presidential Election, the “Black Rober
Royalist“ handed Donald Trump with delay and the recent decision in 23-939 Trump, Donald J. v. United States “unitary theory” of the Presidency. decided July 1,
2024.”[17]
Judge-Made-Law only
gives the allusion of settling things.
Grey is the best the REAL world has to offer. “We need more GREY”
Thursday, November 6, 2025 - 8:49:10 AM
The
Constitution for the United States - Article I, II, and Schoolhouse Rock’s[18] “I’m Just a Bill[19]” clearly define how to make law. Show me where in the amended Constitution for
the United States “judge-made-law” is called for or authorized[20]?
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view
The Issue with Trump, HAS
NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html
American Exceptionalism – NOT SO MUCH
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html
A Balanced Budget for America
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html
BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst,
pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president
of...
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html
The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt “dark money”
Senate and Electoral College
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic
degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
The constitutional small "d"
unrepresentative corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
The Judicial sophistry of "absolute
immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of
We the People's unalienable rights under color of law... the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and
stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario.
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html
DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of
Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and
18-5856)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets
Thursday, November 6, 2025 - 8:49:10 AM
Congress shall make no law respecting… abridging the…
right of the people… to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
[2]
First Amendment - Congress shall make
no law respecting… abridging the… right of the people… to petition the
Government for a redress of grievances.
[3]
The Magna Carta’s (1215) due process i.e., Chapter 39, which stated that
"no freeman shall be taken or imprisoned... except by the lawful judgment
of his peers or by the law of the land".
[4]
Seventh Amendment
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy
shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and
no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the
United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
[5]
U.S. Constitution, Article II Section 3.2 “The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases
of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where
the said Crimes shall have been committed”
[6]
Judge’s criminal absolute immunity Randall v. Brigham, 74 U.S. 523 (1868).
Judge’s CIVIL absolute immunity Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1871),
Prosecutors’ CIVIL absolute immunity Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976),
Police’s and all person’s integral in the judicial process’s CIVIL absolute
immunity Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983),
and MOST recently King’s / Executive’s CIVIL
absolute immunity Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. ___ (2024) Docket
No.23-939
[9]
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view
[10]
"The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme
Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may
from time to time ordain and establish." Article III, Section. 1
U.S. Constitution. That is a to say a
supreme Court among the many inferior courts, NOT a Supreme Court over ALL.
[11]
The only reference to slavery in the original Constitution for the United
States was oblique restriction in Section 1, Article 9. “The Migration or Importation of such Persons
as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be
prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and
eight (1808), but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not
exceeding ten dollars for each Person.”
The slave faction in the south had for the 50 years
after 1808, been using the Caribbean to UNCONSTITUTIONALLY import acclimated
slaves into the United States.
Congress shall make no law respecting… abridging the…
right of the people… to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
[13]
RANDALL v. BRIGHAM is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United
States on April 15, 1869. The case was argued before the court
on April 6, 1869. President Andrew
Johnson’s Veto Overridden by the House and became law on April 9, 1866
[14]
Now codified into the current Federal CRIMINAL Statutory law as 18 U.S. Code § 241&242 – Action /
Conspiracy against rights
[15]
BRADLEY v. FISHER is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United
States on April 8, 1872. The case was argued before the court on February 26,
1872. In a 6-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower
court. Signed into law by President
Ulysses S. Grant on April 20, 1871
[16]
Now codified into the current Federal CIVIL Statutory law as 42 U.S. Code § 1983&1985 - Civil
action for deprivation (or conspiracy) of rights
[17]
DGJeep v supreme Court of the United States
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view
Thanks in advance...
"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')
David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)
www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com
Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message
David G. Jeep
1531 Pine St Apt #512
St. Louis, MO 63103-2548
No comments:
Post a Comment