Monday, October 27, 2025

TDoI

 

Monday, October 27, 2025 - 8:56:14 AM

 

A person with a ponytail AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Pat, I am OK.  You are OK.

 

The Department of Injustice!

 

To all the talking-head litigators[1] out there, the country does not need another slick ambulance chasing or even a voting-rights-chasing law firm.  Voting rights, while essential, are next to NOTHING against the entrenched despotism of an UNELECTED unrepresentative appointed for life oligarchy!

Thomas Jefferson in 1820 confirmed the proverbial cave-person’s issue, the Founding Father’s issue and our issue TODAY with the dictates of any UNELECTED unrepresentative appointed for life oligarchy:

"(Y)you seem to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so.  They have, with others, the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps.... Their power [is] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots…."

"I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society, but the people themselves (think “juries”): and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their controul with a wholsome discretion, the remedy is, not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power." (Thomas Jefferson 9/28/1820, in writing to Mr. JARVIS, from Monticello - bolding/underlining/parentheticals) added)[2]

If the legal profession truly wants to be RELEVANT take on the last clause of the First Amendment with the unfettered 7th Amendment:

"Congress shall make no law respecting: the right of the people....  to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." 

In today’s “Trumpian” world, we need 1st and 7th Amendment Judge-chasing, Police-chasing, President / executive-chasing lawyers.  We need local juries to decide the issues not detached ivory-tower, want-to-be, unconstitutional Supreme[3] judges.

The King’s protection of “sovereign immunity” is, was and had been “a BIG thing" in the revolutionary era.  The FOUNDERS wanted to preclude its use in the future of their new United States. 

Yet with the use of unrepresentative, undemocratic judge-made-law’s ubiquitous[4] grant of “absolute immunity” it has grown beyond anything the Founder’s had feared about the King’s sovereign immunity.

It took two men and boy to get Ida B. Wells off the train in 1884!  Ida B. Wells got a judgement of $500 (~$17,498 in 2024) of her local peers in 1884.  That was 71 years before Rosa Parks staged (1955), for the camera’s(?), refusal to give up her seat.  Parks was fined $10, plus $4 in court fees (equivalent to $164 in 2024).. 

Judge-made-law unconstitutionally shot them both down in 1887 and 1955!!  And since then, We the People have lived with the entrenched racial discrimination on “Jim Crow” leading into “Jane Crow” unconstitutionally over John Marshal Harland’s dissent in Plessy.

I fully support James Comey, Letitia James, John Bolton, Myself,[5] others to come, and Donald Trump in our pursuit of 1st and 7th Amendment Constitutional Justice.

James Comey, Letitia James, John Bolton, Myself,[6] and others to come - all have viable rights to defend against sovereignty of the King’s “absolute immunity. 

I support Donald Trump’s[7] right to 1st and 7th Amendment Constitutional Justice, because to do so, he has to relinquish his unconstitutional use of “absolute immunity” admit Jack Smith’s detailed prosecution into evidence and then disprove it with OVERWHELMING evidence to a civil jury’s “preponderance of the evidence” majority (9 of 12) and not a criminal jury’s “beyond a shadow of a doubt” (12 of 12).  

I predict Trump and his sycophantic lawyers will be revealed, as the corrupt and incompetent pretenders they ARE!   

I hope someday we make Judge-chasing, Police-chasing every bit as viable as any want-to-be ambulance chasing today!!!!

The Founding Fathers gave us the, too often overlooked, last clause of the FIRST Amendment and the 7th amendment to fight the imperialism of a would be “King” or ANY despotic oligarchy.

Judge-made-law has created ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY from the Constitution to enable the CORRUPT oligarchy’s imperialism with 200 years of racism, 150 years of unrestrained capitalism and 75 years of Jane Crow[8] at the expense of We the People’s greater good!!!

In a soon to be 10 billion person world, We the People need to learn to work together with socialism or die on the capitalist / imperialist sword of nuclear annihilation!!!

Men are disfavored by U.S. domestic relation law!!! [9]

The Constitution for the United States - Article I, II, and Schoolhouse-Rock’s[10] “I’m Just a Bill[11]” clearly define how to make law.  Show me where in the amended Constitution for the United States “judge-made-law” is called for or authorized[12]?

Don’t kid yourself and say the Justice System is larger than just the supreme[13] Court.  Yes, the despotic oligarchy can and does use “the SYSTEM” to their advantage. 

If they want to bury, a hot issue, they can BURY it in infinite delay with their appeal process: and then just deny it. 

If they want to strategically manipulate an election, they can delay it for decision at or just prior to any election, they chose, as they did with Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. ___ (2024)[14] , Docket No.23-939  (Indicted August 1, 2023[15], Granted: February 28, 2024, Argued: April 25, 2024, Decided: July 1, 2024[16])

If they want to take FAST ACTION. slip it past public comment or consequence, they can render an unsubstantiated light-speed opinion on the Shadow Docket[17] and GET what they want in hurry!   

I hope someday we make Judge-chasing, Police-chasing every bit as viable as any want-to-be ambulance chasing today!!!!

 

"Fake News Donny"

 

 

Monday, October 27, 2025 - 8:56:14 AM

 

The Constitution for the United States - Article I, II, and  Schoolhouse Rock’s[18] “I’m Just a Bill[19]” clearly define how to make law.  Show me where in the amended Constitution for the United States “judge-made-law” is called for or authorized[20]?

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view

The Issue with Trump, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html

American Exceptionalism – NOT SO MUCH

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html

A Balanced Budget for America

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html

BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president of...

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html

The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

The constitutional small "d" unrepresentative corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

The Judicial sophistry of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law...  the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario. 

The Emperor Has No Clothes.

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

Monday, October 27, 2025 - 8:56:14 AM

 

"Fake News Donny"

 


[1] Popok Law Firm / Legal AF, Democracy Docket, Medias Touch

[2] Thomas Jefferson 28th September 1820, in writing to Mr. JARVIS, from Monticello

[3] Check the capitalization on the original Constitution.  Article III Section 1 states “The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.”  I.e., one supreme Court and inferior Courts.  Not a Supreme Court about all

[4] Judge’s criminal absolute immunity Randall v. Brigham, 74 U.S. 523 (1868). Judge’s CIVIL absolute immunity Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1871), Prosecutors’ CIVIL absolute immunity Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976), Police’s and all person’s integral in the judicial process’s CIVIL absolute immunity Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983), and MOST recently  King’s / Executive’s CIVIL absolute immunity Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. ___ (2024) Docket No.23-939

[5] DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

[6] DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

[8] Men are disfavored by U.S. domestic relation law!!!  DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

[9] Men are disfavored by U.S. domestic relation law!!!  DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

[13] Check the capitalization on the original Constitution.  Article III Section 1 states “The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.”  I.e., one supreme Court and inferior Courts.  Not a Supreme Court about all

[15] Jack Smith wanted to present his evidence ASAP.  But was delayed and then DENIED

[16] At he VERY latest a decision was expect by 5/31/25 as NORMAL, but even that was delayed 30 VERY critical days until 7/1/25

[17] “Why the shadow docket should concern us all” By Erwin Chemerinsky, on Aug 4, 2025

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view 


[1] Popok Law Firm / Legal AF, Democracy Docket, Medias Touch

[2] Thomas Jefferson 28th September 1820, in writing to Mr. JARVIS, from Monticello

[3] Check the capitalization on the original Constitution.  Article III Section 1 states "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish."  I.e., one supreme Court and inferior Courts.  Not a Supreme Court about all

[4] Judge's criminal absolute immunity Randall v. Brigham, 74 U.S. 523 (1868). Judge's CIVIL absolute immunity Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1871), Prosecutors' CIVIL absolute immunity Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976), Police's and all person's integral in the judicial process's CIVIL absolute immunity Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983), and MOST recently  King's / Executive's CIVIL absolute immunity Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. ___ (2024) Docket No.23-939

[5] DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

[6] DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

[8] Men are disfavored by U.S. domestic relation law!!!  DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

[9] Men are disfavored by U.S. domestic relation law!!!  DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

[13] Check the capitalization on the original Constitution.  Article III Section 1 states "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish."  I.e., one supreme Court and inferior Courts.  Not a Supreme Court about all

[15] "Why the shadow docket should concern us all" By Erwin Chemerinsky, on Aug 4, 2025
https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/08/why-the-shadow-docket-should-concern-us-all/


Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com  - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

 

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #512

St. Louis, MO 63103-2548

 
Posted by at
Labels: , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)