Monday, November 21, 2022

DGJeep[1] v. United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856) FOLLOW UP



                    Delivered, Individual Picked Up at Postal Facility
                    WASHINGTON, DC 20543 
                    November 29, 2022, 11:31 am




Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.

Supreme Court of the United States

One First Street N.E.

Washington, DC 20543-0001

 

Re:     DGJeep[1] v. United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856) FOLLOW UP

 

Dear People,

 

I sent you a letter dated September 15, 2022.  I referenced a CRIMINAL RICO conspiracy against rights.  I included a $300 US Postal Money Order, for fees for my 1st & 7th Amendment Constitutionally GUARANTEED rights.  It has been 60+ days.  I have heard NOTHING.

Now IF, I lived in a CIVILIZED country, as our founders had envisioned, with 1st & 7th Amendment rights; anyone could get a civilized "due process" "right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."  But the Article III anarchist prefer to unconditionally[2] deny 1st & 7th Amendment constitutional civilized "due process rights" and sustain, if not promote, the violent disruptiveness of 2nd Amendment - Trumpian – "January 6th" rights over peaceful-civilized "due process rights." 

As repeatedly stated, "I am a card-carrying pacifist."[3]  I have never owned or felt the need of a gun.  13+ years ago - when I wrote on this issue, they held me in jail for 411 days and then released me - "all charges were dismissed for failure to prosecute" [4] – hoping I would go away.  12+ years later I am still appealing, see Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856.  I am still in the "nightmare" pursuing civilized justice.

This will be the 20th Christmas of my documented second-class paternity.  My son was 8 when this started, he will be 28 shortly.  My second-class paternity was instigated by a then newly created Family Commissioner.  I was told it was a newly created position and it was within the first 30(?) days on the job.

Now I could almost happily make a case that "We the People" need a Supreme Court that is immune from any RICO liability for rights.  But the conspiratorial Article III anarchist's criminal establishment of "absolute immunity from subsequent damages liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"[5] fatally overcomes any if not all attempts at the constitutional establishment of civilized justice. 

Just imagine if Ida B. Wells (born July 16, 1862) could have gotten access to justice in 1884 i.e., gotten her 7th Amendment Rights.[6]  We could have avoided the 100-years of racial unrest.  I would not be here right now.  Fathers could get fair treatment today.

I would bet that we would be closer to the 5% of fatherless homes from 1960 than the 40% of fatherless homes in 2014.[7]  Fathers ARE disfavored by domestic relations law in the United States of America!

If there is anything further, please let me know.

Thank you in advance.

David G. Jeep

 

cc: Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice, Sandra Day O'Connor (Retired), Associate Justice , Anthony M. Kennedy, (Retired) Associate Justice , David H. Souter (Retired), Associate Justice, Stephen G. Breyer, (Retired), Associate Justice, Lisa Nesbit c/o Scott S. Harris Supreme Court Clerk, Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski and Willie Geist - Morning Joe - MSNBC Network, Attorney General Merrick Garland, DOJ Civil Rights Division

      www.DGJeep.com, file

 

NOTE: Despite post-war revisionist's corrupt assertions there was nothing about empowering "state's rights" in any of the United States' post-Civil War amendments, criminal or civil statutes.  Arguably the Civil War was fought to eliminate States' rights.  "States' rights" were GREATLY reduced if not eliminated by United States, the WINNERS of the Civil War, nationalizing the United States' constitutional civil, voting, and criminal "due process" RIGHTS!



[1] It should be noted that my middle class family roots had the Jeep name centuries in advance of the Willys Motor Co creation of their General Purpose (GP) for the U.S. Army.  My Father fought in WWII and drove / rode a GP.

[2] Supreme Court precedent creates uncivilized ANARCHY by saying "the common law provided absolute immunity from subsequent damages liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process. It is equally clear that § 1983 does not authorize a damages claim against private witnesses, on the one hand, or against judges or prosecutors in the performance of their respective duties, on the other." Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 335 (1983)

[5] ibid

[6] "We think it is evident that the purpose of the defendant in error was to harass with a view to this suit, and that her persistence was not in good faith to obtain a comfortable seat for the short ride." Chesapeake, O. & S. R. Co. v. Wells, 1887, p. 5.

[7] "The Economics of Non-Marital Childbearing and The "Marriage Premium for Children"," Melissa Kearney and Phillip Levine (2017), Male Earnings, Marriageable Men, and Nonmarital Fertility: Evidence from the Fracking Boom (2017) JULY 5, 2017, EPISODE 294, FREAKONOMICS, The Fracking Boom, a Baby Boom, and the Retreat From Marriage," Are Children "Normal"?" (2013), "Births to Unmarried Women," Child Trends ( 2016), "An Economic Analysis of Fertility," Gary Becker (1960),







Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

 

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #403

St. Louis, MO 63103-2547



No comments: