Tuesday,
August 26, 2025 - 3:15:23 PM
Pat, I am OK. You are OK.
A case can be made
There is a case to be made that the failure, the Constitutional
corruption actually started with Cherokee Nation v.
Georgia (1831), 30 U.S. (5 Pet.) 1 (1831) i.e., President Andrew Jackson’s Trail of Tears.
As a result the learned and the elite it was thought then and even
today the Courts had to be given more authority than just precedent w/juries.
John Marshall was the fourth Chief Justice of the United States
Supreme Court, serving from 1801 to 1835.
John Marshall had proposed an authority Marbury v. Madison,
5 U.S. 137 (1803) to jus aicere[1]
but he did not have the foresight of Blackwell to limit it i.e., not jus dare[2].. Marshall possibly had the moral authority and
humility that could have been trusted with the power. In the 32 years of his post Marbury tenure he
rarely if ever used it.
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Marshall’s (1801-1835)
successor Chief Justice Roger B. Taney (1836-1864), with the good
will Marshall had accumulated, used judge-made-law on a wholesale level to
entrench slavery by creating judge-made-law empowering Fugitive Slaves Laws w/Prigg v. Pennsylvania, 41 U.S. 539 (1842) Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 and Strader v. Graham, 51 U.S. 82 (1851) the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, over
and above the Free States Constitution territorial authority .
And then to START the Civil War with Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)
to entrench slavery in the then Free States and the new territories by
unconstitutional judge-made-law asserting “that they (negroes of the African race)
had no rights which the white man was bound to respect".
We the People fought a Civil War and invested 600,000,000+ lives
to eliminate slavery reiterate our Declaration of Independence:
“We hold
these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are
endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights,
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the
consent of the governed”
and establish the XII, XIV, and XV Amendments each with a
Section “Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.”
Why because the Free States had spent decades saying the
judge-made-FICTION that had given the “Fugitive Slave Acts” constitutional
authority across state lines would not be similarly in dispute as regards the
forth coming Enforcement Acts to insure the “rights, privileges, or immunities secured
by the Constitution and laws[1]” for the
former slaves.
There is no Constitutional premise for immunity
from the Constitution, or the laws derived from it. In fact immunity from the constitution is antithetical
to the premise of a constitution’s raison d'etre, i.e. the law is King.
For the first nearly 100 years that preceded
Randall and Bradley (1776-1868) there was neither need nor questions regarding Judicial
Immunity and then TWO despotic precedents “judge-made-law” within 5 years.. Randall v. Brigham,
74 U. S. 536 (decided April 15, 1869)[3]
in response to the criminal liability in The
Civil Rights Act of 1866 passed in to law April 9, 1866 and then Bradley v. Fisher, 80
U.S. 335 (decided April 8, 1872)[4]
in response to civil liability in the Civil Rights
Act of 1871 passed into law April 20, 1871
are the origins of unconstitutional “immunity”
in the American Justice system. Not to mention racially
motivated mass murder in Blyew[5], and racially
motivated pogrom in Cruikshank[6] just post-Civil War..
As we started the post-Civil War, Ida B. Wells
got a judgement for being forcibly removed from a train while holding a valid
ticket. Two men and a boy had to drag
her off. When the local circuit court granted
her a $500 (~$17,498 in 2024) awarded on December 24, 1884,, that was Rosa Parks's lost her case in 1956. Of course it was over ruled by the
un-Constitutional absolutely-immune judge-made-law when the Tennessee Supreme Court,
which reversed the lower court's ruling in 1887. It concluded: "We think
it is evident that the purpose of the defendant in error was to harass with a
view to this suit, and that her persistence was not in good faith to obtain a
comfortable seat for the short ride" (Chesapeake,
O. & S. R. Co. v. Wells, 1887, p. 5. )[
Judicial Immunity has since un-Constitutionally
spawned reconfirmation of immunity from liability for damages for his judicial
acts, see Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967), "state prosecuting attorney
is absolutely immune from a civil suit for damages under § 1983 for alleged deprivations
of the accused's constitutional rights" see Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409
(1976), Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) gives immunity to police officers
and their informants "for giving perjured testimony at the defendant's criminal
trial," and Briscoe then goes further with “absolute immunity… for all
persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial
process”[5] for the “deprivation
of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws”
see Briscoe v. LaHue,
460 U.S. 325 (1983) @ Page 460 U. S. 335.
And more recently the immunity and the Presidential Election,
the black-robed-royalist from Article III handed Donald Trump the
2024 election with delay and their recent decision in 23-939 Trump, Donald J. v.
United States “unitary theory” of the Presidency. decided July 1, 2024.
Judge-made-law is the ABOMINATION that got Trump elected and
keeps Trump in office TODAY!!! Everybody wanted the three
despotic Black Robed Royalist Trump got to appoint. But:
“The Constitution
has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with
the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots." (Thomas
Jefferson 1820 - bolding/underlining added)
And if we allow judicial-supremacy to remain without
constitutional authority “god only knows” how far these despots
will go are the next.
The founding
fathers never conceived of judicial supremacy!!!!!
The
founding fathers gave us CONGRESSIONAL SUPREMACY wit Article III Section 2.2 “the
supreme Court… under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.” We do not need a Constitutional Amendment
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view
The
Issue with Trump, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html
American Exceptionalism – NOT SO
MUCH
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html
A Balanced Budget for America
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html
BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at
best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
Trump does not know the name of the country he
was or is to be president of...
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html
The constitutional small "d" undemocratic
corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic
criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html
The constitutional small "d"
unrepresentative corrupt “dark money” Senate and Electoral College
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html
The Judicial sophistry of
"absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE
CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law... the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity
in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario.
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html
https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html
DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States
(Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551,
14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets
Tuesday,
August 26, 2025 - 3:15:23 PM
[1]
The Enforcement Acts were three federal laws passed by the U.S. Congress
in 1870 and 1871 during the Reconstruction era to protect the civil rights of
African Americans and enforce the 13th, 14th & 15th
Amendment.
[1]
"It is emphatically the province of the judicial department to say what the
law is"—Chief Justice John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison
[2]
not to give the law.
[3]
RANDALL v. BRIGHAM is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 15,
1869. The case was argued before the court on April 6, 1869. President john Veto Overridden by the House and
became law on April 9, 1866
[4]
BRADLEY v. FISHER is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United
States on April 8, 1872. The case was argued before the court on February 26, 1872.
In a 6-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. Signed into law by President Ulysses S. Grant
on April 20, 1871
[5]
Blyew v. United States, 80 U.S. 581 (1871)
[6]
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876)
No comments:
Post a Comment