Thursday, August 28, 2025

DEEPEST d

Tuesday, August 26, 2025 - 12:35:05 PM

Pat, I am OK. You are OK.

M.A.G.A. / Trump's deepest, of the "deep state's" enablers.

"From a MAGA perspective, the "deep state" refers to a purported clandestine network of career government officials and their allies in media and finance who secretly work to manipulate or control government policy. The core accusation is that this network undermines the agenda of elected leaders, particularly Donald Trump, and acts against the will of the people."

Does that sound like unelected, appointed for life government officials, who make and enforce their opinions? The deepest, of the "deep state" today is a want-to-be Supreme[1] Court making judge-made-law in any or all cases without the free consent of all parties or a specific trial criminal^{^[2]} or civil^{^[3]} jury verdict.

The Constitution for the United States defines how to make a law in Article I & II. Show me where in the amended Constitution for the United States (7,500-8,500 words) "judge-made-law" is provided for or authorized?^{^[4]}

We the People need a "supreme Court" among the many "inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.[5]" We the People in our Constitution limit EVERY Court's authority with free consent of all parties or a Jury trial verdict, criminal[6] and civil[7].

We the People need learned men, just like Plato suggested as "Philosopher Kings" in The Republic 375 BC. We the People need Judges that have studied "the law" and "judicial precedent. We the People need the possibility of an appealable directed verdict. A directed verdict is a ruling by a trial judge in a jury trial that instructs the jury to return a specific verdict because one party has failed to present sufficient evidence to support its case, or the evidence overwhelmingly supports only one conclusion.

I mean if Donald Trump shot someone on 5^th Avenue in M.A.G.A, land without probable cause, as witnessed by numerous sworn testimonies at trial. We need the appealable possibility of a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) in civil cases, or a judgment of acquittal in criminal cases.

But any assertion of "absolute immunity before the fact or after the fact is antithetical to the raison d'etre for a constitution. As Trump's "deepest, of the "deep state's" enablers" have attempted with stare decisis attached.

"Judge-made-law," like its recent example the "unitary executive theory," are mere illusions of A judge's fantasy. Precedent from a prior case, can be presented as an opinion to consider, but not as a BINDING AUTHORITY from stare decisis. That kind of corruption got us 100+ years of racial discrimination with the Declaration of Independence's assertion "all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness", XII, XIV, XV Amendments and their INCLUDED "Enforcement Acts"

Trump ever day projects the evil of the deep-state on others and benefits from his UN-Constitutional "deepest, of the "deep state's" enablers" handing him the election in 2024 with 23-939 Trump v. United States (07/01/2024) in the Supreme Court of the United States while disparaging the very thought of a "deep-state" with virtually every other breath…

Tuesday, August 26, 2025 - 12:35:05 PM

Article I, II, and "School-Yard-Rock" clearly define how to make law. Show me where in the amended Constitution for the United States "judge-made-law" is called for or authorized?

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view

The Issue with Trump, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html

American Exceptionalism – NOT SO MUCH

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html

Equal Rights in a Free Market Economy

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html

A Balanced Budget for America

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html

BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president of...

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html

The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt "dark money" Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

The constitutional small "d" unrepresentative corrupt "dark money" Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

The Judicial sophistry of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights under color of law... the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario.

The Emperor Has No Clothes.

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

The FACTS of MY case are without question

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html

DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

Tuesday, August 26, 2025 - 12:35:05 PM

[1] See the Constitution for the United States Article III Section 1, provides for a "supreme Court" among "such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. A "Supreme Court" over ALL is never posited in the Constitution for the United States,"

[2] See the Constitution for the United States Article III Section 4.3

[3] See the Constitution for the United States Amendment VII

[4] https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfmushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view

[5] See the Constitution for the United States Article III , Section 1.

[6] See the Constitution for the United States Article III Section 4.3

[7] See the Constitution for the United States Amendment VII

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #512

St. Louis, MO 63103-2548

Wednesday, August 27, 2025

WHERE IS THE FIRE?????

Tuesday, August 26, 2025 - 9:52:08 PM

Pat, I am OK. You are OK.

We Use To Have An Article III Justice System?

Our Article III Justice System is and has been failing the U.S. We imprison ourselves at 4 times the rate pf the rest of the civilized world. And yes we imprison our Blacks at four times the rate of non-Blacks. Yes we have more guns, but that does not account for even one of the three orders of magnitude. And NO the streets of the rest of the civilized world are not four times as threatening and/or criminal.

You know what it is, it is our failing justice system. Our Article III Justice System long ago decided that justice and civil rights were incompatible. We had to give absolute immunity for the deprivation of rights, first to the Judges[1]. And the judges then handed it out to the prosecutors and police, first under the table but then above the table[2]. Till today in the United States EVERYBODY has at least qualified Immunity for the deprivation of Constitutional Rights. Everybody that is but the innocent victim of the deprivation of rights.

Here we are in August 2025. Everybody use to know that, "Shouting Fire" in a crowded theater was wrong. There is nothing political about it. It is just common sense WRONG! Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr, went further and said "The most stringent protection of (political) free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic."[3]

Yet we have a mad-man, an anarchist in the White House. Our failing Article III Justice system will not even allow us to ask or statutorily afforded right, "Where is the (fire) emergency?" The mad anarchist is shouting "We have an emergency in our economy!" "We have an emergency in our immigration system!" "We have an emergency in our Blue City Streets, but not our Red City Streets!"

Statutorily we are supposed to be given the declared "emergency." Emergencies, as assumed in statute law, are by definition apolitical, obvious and somehow imminently threatening. You can not assert an economic emergency in a booming economy, "The envy of the world. You can not assert an emergency with an immigration system that provides, millions of low wage NON-VIOLENT workers essential to our booming economy. You cannot assert crime is an out of control emergency exclusively in Blue cities with crimes rates dramatically lower historically than many Red cities – just because you do not want to release the Epstein files unredacted, except for the victims, as promised during the election and since the inauguration.

"The American economy" The envy of the world The Economist - Special reports-Oct 19th 2024. "The American economy has left other rich countries in the dust. Expect that to continue, argue Simon Rabinovitch and Henry Curr"

The Wall Street Journal said "From the end of 2020 through mid-2024, the economy under Biden showed robust real GDP growth, with one comparison noting a 3.2% annual rate compared to Trump's 1.8% pre-pandemic rate.

Of course, there was a Pandemic. The Start of COVID Pandemic was March 2020. Biden took office Wednesday, January 20, 2021, almost 11 months after the start of the pandemic. Trump/COVID/Biden Inflation peaked at 9% on Thursday, June 30, 2022, 28 months after the start of the Pandemic and only 17 months after Biden took office. And then inflation was down 3% by the time Biden left office in January of this year.

I would like to think we had an Article III Justice System where "We the People" could hold our Article III Justice System accountable for our Constitutional Civil Rights[4] as designed.

But MORE IMPORTANTLY and right now, we have a mad anarchist in the White House Shouting Fire, Fire, Fire!! I am just asking where is the FIRE? Fires are like emergencies, APOLITICAL and obvious and imminently threatening.

WHERE IS THE FIRE?????

Tuesday, August 26, 2025 - 9:52:25 PM

Article I, II, and "School-Yard-Rock" clearly define how to make law. Show me where in the amended Constitution for the United States "judge-made-law" is called for or authorized?

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view

The Issue with Trump, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-issue-with-trump.html

American Exceptionalism – NOT SO MUCH

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2023/10/american-exceptionalism-not-so-much.html

Equal Rights in a Free Market Economy

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013/04/equal-rights-in-free-market-economy.html

A Balanced Budget for America

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2012/07/balanced-budget-for-america.html

BE AWARE, but do not be afraid, Trump is, at best and at worst, pathetically incompetent and INEFFECTIVE manager / leader!

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

Trump does not know the name of the country he was or is to be president of...

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/istgtdnk.html

The constitutional small "d" undemocratic corrupt "dark money" Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

Trump is a convicted and diagnosed psychotic criminal, chronic degenerate, maniacal liar and a "fucking moron!"

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/01/be-aware.html

The constitutional small "d" unrepresentative corrupt "dark money" Senate and Electoral College

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/dark-money-senate.html

The Emperor Has No Clothes.

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2024/01/if-that-is-not-absolute-corruption-of.html

The FACTS of MY case are without question

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-facts-of-my-case-are-without.html

DGJeep v. Supreme Court of the United States (Petitions for Writ of Certiorari 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=David+Jeep&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets

Tuesday, August 26, 2025 - 5:37:18 PM

[1] See Blyew, Cruikshank, Randall and Bradely

[2] Imbler, Briscoe, and recently Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024)

[3] Schenck v. United States, 249 U. S. 52 (1919)

[4] See DGJeep v supreme Court and Petition for Writ of Certioraris to the supreme Court of the United States and associated District and Circuit petitions… 07-11115, 11-8211, 13-7030, 13-5193, 14-5551, 14-10088, 15-8884 and 18-5856.

https://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2025/06/sc.html

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FVfm-ushzCCTS5BtH1R7MeOvnDvh_kqv/view

Thanks in advance...

"Agere sequitur esse" ('action follows being')

David G. Jeep, Federal Inmate #36072-044 (formerly)

www.DGJeep.com - Dave@DGJeep.com - David.G.Jeep@Gmail.com

Mobile (314) 514-5228 leave message

David G. Jeep

1531 Pine St Apt #512

St. Louis, MO 63103-2548

Tuesday, August 26, 2025

AC

Tuesday, August 26, 2025 - 3:15:23 PM

Pat, I am OK. You are OK.

A case can be made

There is a case to be made that the failure, the Constitutional corruption actually started with Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831), 30 U.S. (5 Pet.) 1 (1831) i.e., President Andrew Jackson’s Trail of Tears.

As a result the learned and the elite it was thought then and even today the Courts had to be given more authority than just precedent w/juries.

John Marshall was the fourth Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, serving from 1801 to 1835. John Marshall had proposed an authority Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) to jus aicere^{^[1]} but he did not have the foresight of Blackwell to limit it i.e., not jus dare^{^[2]}.. Marshall possibly had the moral authority and humility that could have been trusted with the power. In the 32 years of his post Marbury tenure he rarely if ever used it.

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Marshall’s (1801-1835) successor Chief Justice Roger B. Taney (1836-1864), with the good will Marshall had accumulated, used judge-made-law on a wholesale level to entrench slavery by creating judge-made-law empowering Fugitive Slaves Laws w/Prigg v. Pennsylvania, 41 U.S. 539 (1842) Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 and Strader v. Graham, 51 U.S. 82 (1851) the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, over and above the Free States Constitution territorial authority .

And then to START the Civil War with Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) to entrench slavery in the then Free States and the new territories by unconstitutional judge-made-law asserting “that they (negroes of the African race) had no rights which the white man was bound to respect".

We the People fought a Civil War and invested 600,000,000+ lives to eliminate slavery reiterate our Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”

and establish the XII, XIV, and XV Amendments each with a Section “Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.”

Why because the Free States had spent decades saying the judge-made-FICTION that had given the “Fugitive Slave Acts” constitutional authority across state lines would not be similarly in dispute as regards the forth coming Enforcement Acts to insure the “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws[1]” for the former slaves.

There is no Constitutional premise for immunity from the Constitution, or the laws derived from it. In fact immunity from the constitution is antithetical to the premise of a constitution’s raison d'etre, i.e. the law is King.

For the first nearly 100 years that preceded Randall and Bradley (1776-1868) there was neither need nor questions regarding Judicial Immunity and then TWO despotic precedents “judge-made-law” within 5 years.. Randall v. Brigham, 74 U. S. 536 (decided April 15, 1869)[3] in response to the criminal liability in The Civil Rights Act of 1866 passed in to law April 9, 1866 and then Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (decided April 8, 1872)[4] in response to civil liability in the Civil Rights Act of 1871 passed into law April 20, 1871 are the origins of unconstitutional “immunity” in the American Justice system. Not to mention racially motivated mass murder in Blyew[5], and racially motivated pogrom in Cruikshank[6] just post-Civil War..

As we started the post-Civil War, Ida B. Wells got a judgement for being forcibly removed from a train while holding a valid ticket. Two men and a boy had to drag her off. When the local circuit court granted her a $500 (~$17,498 in 2024) awarded on December 24, 1884,, that was Rosa Parks's lost her case in 1956. Of course it was over ruled by the un-Constitutional absolutely-immune judge-made-law when the Tennessee Supreme Court, which reversed the lower court's ruling in 1887. It concluded: "We think it is evident that the purpose of the defendant in error was to harass with a view to this suit, and that her persistence was not in good faith to obtain a comfortable seat for the short ride" (Chesapeake, O. & S. R. Co. v. Wells, 1887, p. 5.^)[

Judicial Immunity has since un-Constitutionally spawned reconfirmation of immunity from liability for damages for his judicial acts, see Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967), "state prosecuting attorney is absolutely immune from a civil suit for damages under § 1983 for alleged deprivations of the accused's constitutional rights" see Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976), Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) gives immunity to police officers and their informants "for giving perjured testimony at the defendant's criminal trial," and Briscoe then goes further with “absolute immunity… for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process”^[5] for the “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws” see Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) @ Page 460 U. S. 335.

And more recently the immunity and the Presidential Election, the black-robed-royalist from Article III handed Donald Trump the 2024 election with delay and their recent decision in 23-939 Trump, Donald J. v. United States “unitary theory” of the Presidency. decided July 1, 2024.

Judge-made-law is the ABOMINATION that got Trump elected and keeps Trump in office TODAY!!! Everybody wanted the three despotic Black Robed Royalist Trump got to appoint. But:

“The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots." (Thomas Jefferson 1820 - bolding/underlining added)

And if we allow judicial-supremacy to remain without constitutional authority “god only knows” how far these despots will go are the next.

The founding fathers never conceived of judicial supremacy!!!!!

The founding fathers gave us CONGRESSIONAL SUPREMACY with Article III Section 2.2 “the supreme Court… under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.” We do not need a Constitutional Amendment